Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Machine learning models in structural engineering research and a secured framework for structural health monitoring

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health inspection of public structures is intended to detect incipient damage at an initial stage in order to improve maintenance. Artificial intelligence alludes to the part of computer science that comprises various techniques for fulfilling the requirements of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). Deep Learning (DL), and Machine Learning (ML) are often utilized. Deep Learning is an instance of Machine Learning built on deep neural networks that have demonstrated remarkable achievement in numerous applications over the years. This article deals with recent literature reviews on the advent of machine learning models in the performance monitoring of civil structures. Recently, machine learning has gained considerable attention and is being built up as another class of astute techniques for the health inspection of civil structures. The main concern of this examination is to epitomize the strategies built over the last decade for the practice of ML techniques in civil engineering. In addition, types of sensors, number of sensors, sampling frequency, types of structure, structure material, data collection time, and types of excitation in the domain are also explored. Initially, a brief summary of the ML is given, and the implications of the ML in structural/civil engineering are depicted. Afterward, applications of ML methods in the domain are presented and the potential of these approaches to overcome the deficiencies of conventional methods is addressed. The observations after researching the literature, along with research opportunities and future directions in the use of ML, are then discussed. Eventually, a novel, secured framework for Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) using the Ethereum Blockchain is proposed established on the studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdeljaber O, Avci O, Kiranyaz S, Gabbouj M, Inman DJ (2017) Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks. J Sound Vib 388:154–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdeljaber O, Avci O, Kiranyaz MS, Boashash B, Sodano H, Inman DJ (2018) 1-D CNNs for structural damage detection: verification on a structural health monitoring benchmark data. Neurocomput 275:1308–1317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abu-Mahfouz I, Banerjee A (2017) Crack detection and identification using vibration signals and fuzzy clustering. Proced Comput Sci 114:266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.09.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alamdari MM, Rakotoarivelo T, Khoa NLD (2017) A spectral-based clustering for structural health monitoring of the Sydney harbour bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process 87(May 2016):384–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Altunişik, AC (2018) Determination of natural frequencies of arch dams based on reservoir levels using ambient and forced vibration tests. Civil Eng Res J, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.19080/cerj.2018.03.555623

  6. Alves V, Cury A, Roitman N, Magluta C, Cremona C (2015) Structural modification assessment using supervised learning methods applied to vibration data. Eng Struct 99:439–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anaissi A, Lee Y, Naji M (2018) Regularized tensor learning with adaptive one-class support vector machines. In: Cheng L et al. (eds): ICONIP 2018, LNCS 11303, (vol 90, issue 823). Springer International Publishing, pp 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmemag.90.823_758

  8. Anaissi A, Khoa NLD, Rakotoarivelo T, Alamdari MM, Wang Y (2018) Adaptive online one-class support vector machines with applications in structural health monitoring. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 9(6):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230708

  9. Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Kiranyaz S, Hussein M, Inman DJ (2018) Wireless and real-time structural damage detection: a novel decentralized method for wireless sensor networks. J Sound Vib 424:158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Kiranyaz S, Hussein M, Gabbouj M, Inman DJ (2021) A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: from traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications. Mech Syst Signal Process 147:107077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aygün B, Cagri Gungor V (2011) Wireless sensor networks for structure health monitoring: recent advances and future research directions. Sens Rev 31(3):261–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/02602281111140038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balingit, M, Ruble, K, Mufson, S, Sellers, FS (2020) Michigan dam disaster an example of what could happen in many other communities. Wash Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/michigan-dam-disaster-infrastructure/2020/05/22/26bc380a-9c34-11ea-ac72-3841fcc9b35f_story.html

  13. Bao Y, Chen Z, Wei S, Xu Y, Tang Z, Li H (2019) The state of the art of data science and engineering in structural health monitoring. Engineering 5(2):234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beckman GH, Polyzois D, Cha YJ (2018) Deep learning-based automatic volumetric damage quantification using depth camera. Autom Constr 99(November 2018):114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Behnia A, Ranjbar N, Chai HK, Masaeli M (2016) Failure prediction and reliability analysis of ferrocement composite structures by incorporating machine learning into acoustic emission monitoring technique. Constr Build Mater 122:823–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Behnia A, Chai HK, GhasemiGol M, Sepehrinezhad A, Mousa AA (2018) Advanced damage detection technique by integration of unsupervised clustering into acoustic emission. Eng Fract Mech 210(July):212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buyukozturk O, Long J, Mohammadi Ghazi R, Cha Y-J, Chen J et al (2014) Structural Health Monitoring: A Quest towards the Use of Combined Approaches. In: EWSHM - 7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, IFFSTTAR, Inria, Université de Nantes, Nantes

  18. Cao, T, Lim, EP, Zhou, ZH, Ho, TB, Cheung, D, Motoda, H (2015) On damage identification in civil structures using tensor analysis Nguyen. Lect Notes Comput Sci (Incl Subseries Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinf), 9077(May), 0–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18038-0

  19. Chalouhi EK, Gonzalez I, Gentile C, Karoumi R (2017) Damage detection in railway bridges using machine learning: application to a historic structure. Proced Eng 199:1931–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Champneys MD, Green A, Morales J, Silva M, Mascarenas D (2021) On the vulnerability of data-driven structural health monitoring models to adversarial attack. Struct Health Monit 20(4):1476–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720920233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang CM, Lin TK, Chang CW (2018) Applications of neural network models for structural health monitoring based on derived modal properties. Meas J Int Meas Confederation 129(March):457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, B, Zang, C (2009) Unsupervised structure damage classification based on the data clustering and artificial immune pattern recognition. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 5666 LNCS, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03246-2_21

  23. Chen Z, Zhou X, Wang X, Dong L, Qian Y (2017) Deployment of a smart structural health monitoring system for Long-span arch bridges: a review and a case study. Sensors 17(9):2151. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Choy AW (2018) Structural Health Monitoring with Deep Learning. In: Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of The International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2018. Newswood Limited, IAENG, Hong Kong, pp 557–560

  25. Coletta G, Miraglia G, Pecorelli M, Ceravolo R, Cross E, Surace C, Worden K (2018) Use of the cointegration strategies to remove environmental effects from data acquired on historical buildings. Eng Struct 183(October 2018):1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cury A, Cremona C, Dumoulin J (2012) Long-term monitoring of a PSC box girder bridge: operational modal analysis, data normalization and structural modification assessment. Mech Syst Signal Process 33:13–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. de Oliveira MA, Araujo NVS, Inman DJ, Filho JV (2018) Kappa-PSO-FAN based method for damage identification on composite structural health monitoring. Expert Syst Appl 95:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.022

  28. de Oliveira MA, Monteiro AV, Filho JV (2018) A new structural health monitoring strategy based on PZT sensors and convolutional neural network. Sens (Switzerland) 18(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092955

  29. Demarie GV, Sabia D (2018) A machine learning approach for the automatic long-term structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 18(3):819–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718779193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ding Z, Li J, Hao H, Lu ZR (2019) Structural damage identification with uncertain modelling error and measurement noise by clustering based tree seeds algorithm. Eng Struct 185(January):301–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dorafshan S, Thomas RJ, Maguire M (2018) Comparison of deep convolutional neural networks and edge detectors for image-based crack detection in concrete. Constr Build Mater 186:1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dung CV, Anh LD (2018) Autonomous concrete crack detection using deep fully convolutional neural network. Autom Constr 99(July 2018):52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dzunic Z, Chen JG, Mobahi H, Büyüköztürk O, Fisher JW (2017) A Bayesian state-space approach for damage detection and classification. Mech Syst Signal Process 96:239–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fawzy DE, Arslan G (2015) Development of building damage functions for big earthquakes in Turkey. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:2290–2297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Finotti RP, Barbosa S, De F, Cury AA, Gentile C (2017) A novel natural frequency-based technique to detect structural changes using computational intelligence. Proced Eng 199:3314–3319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fisher WD, Camp TK, Krzhizhanovskaya VV (2016) Crack detection in earth dam and levee passive seismic data using support vector machines. Proced Comput Sci 80:577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fisher WD, Camp TK, Krzhizhanovskaya VV (2017) Anomaly detection in earth dam and levee passive seismic data using support vector machines and automatic feature selection. J Comput Sci 20:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2016.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gao Y, Mosalam KM (2018) Deep transfer learning for image-based structural damage recognition. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 33(9):748–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ghrib, M, Rébillat, M, Vermot des Roches, G, Mechbal, N (2018) Automatic damage type classification and severity quantification using signal based and nonlinear model based damage sensitive features. J Process Control https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.08.002

  40. Gordan M, Razak HA, Ismail Z, Ghaedi K (2017) Recent developments in damage identification of structures using data mining. Latin Am J Solids Struct 14(13):2373–2401. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78254378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Guan W, Dong LL, Zhou JM, Han Y, Zhou J (2018) Data-driven methods for operational modal parameters identification: a comparison and application. Meas J Int Meas Confederation 132:238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Guo J, Xie X, Bie R, Sun L (2014) Structural health monitoring by using a sparse coding-based deep learning algorithm with wireless sensor networks. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18(8):1977–1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0800-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hariri-Ardebili MA, Pourkamali-Anaraki F (2018) Support vector machine based reliability analysis of concrete dams. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 104(September 2017):276–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hoang N-D (2018) Image processing-based recognition of wall defects using machine learning approaches and steerable filters. Comput Intell Neurosci 2018:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7913952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Huang H, Wei L, Tong Q, Zhang DM (2018) Deep learning based image recognition for crack and leakage defects of metro shield tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 77(March):166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ince NF, Kao CS, Kaveh M, Tewfik A, Labuz JF (2009) Averaged acoustic emission events for accurate damage localization. ICASSP, IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process Proceed 9:2201–2204. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2009.4960055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jac Fredo AR, Abilash RS, Femi R, Mythili A, Kumar CS (2018) Classification of damages in composite images using Zernike moments and support vector machines. Compos Part B 168:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jung S, Seong W, Lee K (2018) Damage detection on an aluminum plate from the cross-correlation of diffuse field using the support vector machine. Ocean Eng 161(April):88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kang D, Cha YJ (2018) Autonomous UAVs for structural health monitoring using deep learning and an ultrasonic Beacon system with geo-tagging. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 33(10):885–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kang F, Li J, Zhao S, Wang Y (2018) Structural health monitoring of concrete dams using long-term air temperature for thermal effect simulation. Eng Struct 180(March 2018):642–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Khan A, Ko D-K, Lim SC, Kim HS (2019) Structural vibration-based classification and prediction of delamination in smart composite laminates using deep learning neural network. Compos Part B Eng 161:586–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.118

  52. Khoa NLD, Zhang B, Wang Y, Chen F, Mustapha S (2014) Robust dimensionality reduction and damage detection approaches in structural health monitoring. Struct Heal Monit 13(4):406–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921714532989

  53. Khoa, NLD, Makki Alamdari, M, Rakotoarivelo, T, Anaissi, A, Wang, Y (2018) Structural health monitoring using machine learning techniques and domain knowledge based features. Springer International Publishing https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90403-0_20

  54. Kim D, Philen M (2011) Damage classification using Adaboost machine learning for structural health monitoring. Sens Smart Struct Technol Civil, Mech Aerospace Syst 2011(7981):79812A. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.882016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kim, J, Shim, K, Cao, L, Lee, JG, Lin, X, Moon, YS (2017) Adaptive one-class support vector machine for damage detection in structural health monitoring. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 10234 LNAI, 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57454-7

  56. Kromanis R, Kripakaran P (2014) Predicting thermal response of bridges using regression models derived from measurement histories. Comput Struct 136:64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Langone R, Reynders E, Mehrkanoon S, Suykens JAK (2017) Automated structural health monitoring based on adaptive kernel spectral clustering. Mech Syst Signal Process 90:64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Laory I, Trinh TN, Smith IFC, Brownjohn JMW (2014) Methodologies for predicting natural frequency variation of a suspension bridge. Eng Struct 80:211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li Z, Guo J, Liang W, Xie X, Zhang G (2014) Structural health monitoring based on RealAdaBoost algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Springer Int Publ Switzerland 2014:236–245

    Google Scholar 

  60. Li S, Laima S, Li H (2018) Data-driven modeling of vortex-induced vibration of a long-span suspension bridge using decision tree learning and support vector regression. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 172(February 2017):196–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Liang Y, Wu D, Liu G, Li Y, Gao C, Ma ZJ, Wu W (2016) Big data-enabled multiscale serviceability analysis for aging bridges☆. Digit Commun Netw 2(3):97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2016.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lim, ZW, Tan, CKY, Seah, WKG, Tan, GH (2009) Detection of failures in civil structures using artificial neural networks. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 5769 LNCS(PART 2), 976–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04277-5_98

  63. Lim HJ, Sohn H, Kim Y (2018) Data-driven fatigue crack quantification and prognosis using nonlinear ultrasonic modulation. Mech Syst Signal Process 109:185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lin JC-W, Wu JM-T, Fournier-Viger P, Djenouri Y, Chen C-H, Zhang Y (2019) A sanitization approach to secure shared data in an IoT environment. IEEE Access 7:25359–25368. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lin JC-W, Srivastava G, Zhang Y, Djenouri Y, Aloqaily M (2021) Privacy-preserving multiobjective sanitization model in 6G IoT environments. IEEE Internet Things J 8(7):5340–5349. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.3032896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Liu H, Zhang Y (2018) Image-driven structural steel damage condition assessment method using deep learning algorithm. Meas J Int Meas Confederation 133:168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Liu S, Du C, Mou J, Martua L, Zhang J, Lewis FL (2013) Diagnosis of structural cracks using wavelet transform and neural networks. NDT E Int 54:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Liu W, Wu X, Zhang L, Wang Y, Teng J (2018) Sensitivity analysis of structural health risk in operational tunnels. Autom Constr 94(July):135–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lorenzo, GF, Mercerat, D, D’Avila, MPS, Bertrand, E, Deschamps, A (2015) Operational modal analysis of a high rise RC building and modelling. 6th international operational modal analysis conference, IOMAC 2015, September

  70. Mechbal N, Uribe JS, Rébillat M (2015) A probabilistic multi-class classifier for structural health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 60:106–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Melville J, Alguri KS, Deemer C, Harley JB (2018) Structural damage detection using deep learning of ultrasonic guided waves. AIP Conf Proc 1949:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031651

  72. Nazarko, P, Ziemiański, L (2010) Towards application of soft computing in structural health monitoring. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 6114 LNAI(PART 2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13232-2_8

  73. News A (2020) Bridge collapses in Italy, newest crumbling infrastructure. AP News https://apnews.com/article/f969bdea4f95d189584d63d4dd6c6bfe

  74. News A (2020) Brooklyn building collapses after being cited by inspectors. AP News https://apnews.com/article/b9d45eba9e6add2a57829b430536b874

  75. Nick W, Asamene K, Bullock G, Esterline A, Sundaresan M (2015) A study of machine learning techniques for detecting and classifying structural damage. Int J Machine Learn Comput 5(4):313–318. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMLC.2015.V5.526

  76. Oiwa R, Ito T, Kawahara T (2017) Timber Health Monitoring using piezoelectric sensor and machine learning. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA), Annecy, France, pp 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIVEMSA.2017.7995313

  77. Pathirage CSN, Li J, Li L, Hao H, Liu W, Ni P (2018) Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning. Eng Struct 172(January):13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Paul S, Jafari R (2018) Recent advances in intelligent-based structural health monitoring of civil structures. Adv Sci Technol Eng Syst 3(5):339–353. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj030540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Paulraj MP, Yaacob S, Abdul Majid MS, Kazim MNFM, Krishnan P (2013) Structural steel plate damage detection using non destructive testing, frame energy based statistical features and artificial neural networks. Proced Eng 53:376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Prada MA, Toivola J, Kullaa J, Hollmén J (2012) Three-way analysis of structural health monitoring data. Neurocomputing 80:119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2011.07.030

  81. Prasanna P et al (2014) Automated Crack Detection on Concrete Bridges. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2014.2354314

  82. Prasanna P, Dana KJ, Gucunski N, Basily BB, La HM, Lim RS, Parvardeh H (2016) Automated crack detection on concrete bridges. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 13(2):591–599. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2014.2354314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Quaranta, G, Lopez, E, Abisset-Chavanne, E, Duval, JL, Huerta, A, Chinesta, F (2018) Structural health monitoring by combining machine learning and dimensionality reduction techniques. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos Para Cálculo y Diseño En Ingeniería Structural https://doi.org/10.23967/j.rimni.2018.12.001

  84. Rafiei MH, Adeli H (2018) A novel unsupervised deep learning model for global and local health condition assessment of structures. Eng Struct 156(July 2017):598–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Raj JS (2021) Security Enhanced Blockchain based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Health Monitoring System. J ISMAC 2(2):121–131. https://doi.org/10.36548/jismac.2021.2.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Ranković V, Grujović N, Divac D, Milivojević N (2014) Development of support vector regression identification model for prediction of dam structural behaviour. Struct Saf 48:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Rogers TJ, Worden K, Fuentes R, Dervilis N, Tygesen UT, Cross EJ (2019) A Bayesian non-parametric clustering approach for semi-supervised structural health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 119:100–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Roia, D, Gara, F, Speranza, E, Gioiella, L, Dezi, L (2015) Operational modal analysis on a r.c. building for the evaluation of the dynamic changes due to retrofitting. 2015 IEEE workshop on environmental, energy, and structural monitoring systems (EESMS) proceedings, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/EESMS.2015.7175863

  89. Rosales, MJ, Liyanapathirana, R (2017) Data driven innovations in structural health monitoring. J Phys Conf Ser, 842(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/842/1/012012

  90. Salehi H, Burgueño R (2018) Emerging artificial intelligence methods in structural engineering. Eng Struct 171(May):170–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Salehi H, Chakrabartty S, Biswas S, Burgueño R (2018) Localized damage identification in plate-like structures using self-powered sensor data: a pattern recognition strategy. Meas J Int Meas Confederation 135:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Santos A, Figueiredo E, Silva MFM, Sales CS, Costa JCWA (2016) Machine learning algorithms for damage detection: kernel-based approaches. J Sound Vib 363:584–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Sen D, Aghazadeh A, Mousavi A, Nagarajaiah S, Baraniuk R (2018) Sparsity-based approaches for damage detection in plates. Mech Syst Signal Process 117:333–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Sevim B, Altunisik AC, Bayraktar A (2013) Structural identification of concrete arch dams by ambient vibration tests. Adv Concrete Construct 1(3):227–237. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc2013.1.3.227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Shan L, Hui Z, Hong R (2012) Fusion assessment methods for bridge health state based on two step neural networks ensemble. Commun Comput Inf Sci 307(CCIS(PART 1)):97–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34038-3_14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Shen J, Robertson N (2021) BBAS: towards large scale effective ensemble adversarial attacks against deep neural network learning. Inf Sci 569:469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.11.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Silva M, Santos A, Figueiredo E, Santos R, Sales C, Costa JCWA (2016) A novel unsupervised approach based on a genetic algorithm for structural damage detection in bridges. Eng Appl Artif Intell 52:168–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2016.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Silva M, Santos A, Santos R, Figueiredo E, Sales C, Costa JCWA (2017) Agglomerative concentric hypersphere clustering applied to structural damage detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 92:196–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Simonov, E (2020) Uzbekistan dam collapse was a disaster waiting to happen. Thethirdpole.Net. https://www.thethirdpole.net/2020/06/23/uzbekistan-dam-collapse/

  100. Smarsly K, Lehner, K, Hartmann, D (2007) Structural health monitoring based on artificial intelligence techniques. ASCE: Computing in Engineering, 111–118

  101. Smarsly K, Dragos K, Jens W (2016) Machine learning techniques for structural health monitoring. 8th European Workshop On Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2016). www.ndt.net/app.EWSHM2016

  102. Srinivasu PN, Bhoi AK, Nayak SR, Bhutta MR, Woźniak M (2021) Blockchain technology for secured healthcare data communication among the non-terminal nodes in IoT Architecture in 5G Network. Electronics 10(12):1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10121437

  103. Sun L, Shang Z, Xia Y, Bhowmick S, Nagarajaiah S (2020) Review of bridge structural health monitoring aided by big data and artificial intelligence: from condition assessment to damage detection. J Struct Eng 146(5):04020073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Taffese WZ, Sistonen E (2017) Machine learning for durability and service-life assessment of reinforced concrete structures: recent advances and future directions. Autom Constr 77:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Talaei S, Beitollahi A, Moshirabadi S, Fallahian M (2018) Vibration-based structural damage detection using twin Gaussian process (TGP). Structures 16:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Tan ZX, Thambiratnam DP, Chan THT, Abdul Razak H (2017) Detecting damage in steel beams using modal strain energy based damage index and artificial neural network. Eng Fail Anal 79(January):253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.04.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Tang Y, Lin Y, Huang X, Yao M, Huang Z, Zou X (2020) Grand challenges of machine-vision Technology in Civil Structural Health Monitoring. Artificial intelligence Evolution, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.37256/aie.112020250

  108. Tanida, R, Oiwa, R, Ito, T, Kawahara, T (2018) Wooden framed house structural health monitoring by system identification and damage detection under dynamic motion with artificial intelligence sensor using a model of house including braces. CIVEMSA 2018–2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications, Proceedings, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIVEMSA.2018.8439967

  109. Tibaduiza DA, Mujica LE, Rodellar J (2011) Structural health monitoring based on principal component analysis: damage detection, localization and classification. Adv Dyn Control, Monit Appl Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada 3(1):8–17

    Google Scholar 

  110. Tibaduiza DZ, Mujica LE, Rodellar J (2013) Damage classification in structural health monitoring using principal component analysis and self-organizing maps. Struct Control Heal Monit 20(10):1303–1316. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1540

  111. Tibaduiza Burgos D, Vitola J, Anaya M, Pozo F (2016) Structural Damage detection and classification based on Machine learning algorithms. In: 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2016), July 5-8, 2016 in Bilbao, Spain. e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing, vol 21(8). https://www.ndt.net/?id=20071

  112. Tibaduiza D, Torres-Arredondo MÁ, Vitola J, Anaya M, Pozo F (2018) A damage classification approach for structural health monitoring using machine learning. Complexity 2018:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5081283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Toivola, J, Prada, MA, Hollmén, J (2010) Novelty detection in projected spaces for structural health monitoring. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 6065 LNCS, 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13062-5_20

  114. Vallathan G, John A, Thirumalai C, Mohan S, Srivastava G, Lin JC-W (2021) Suspicious activity detection using deep learning in secure assisted living IoT environments. J Supercomput 77(4):3242–3260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03387-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Worden K, Cross EJ (2018) On switching response surface models, with applications to the structural health monitoring of bridges. Mech Syst Signal Process 98:139–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Xie, J (2010) Improved Least Square Support Vector Machine for Structural Damage Detection. ICCET 2010–2010 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, Proceedings, 6, V6–237-V6–240. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCET.2010.5486286

  117. Yang Y, Nagarajaiah S (2014) Structural damage identification via a combination of blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification. Mech Syst Signal Process 45(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Yinfeng D, Yingmin L, Ming L, Mingkui X (2008) Nonlinear structural response prediction based on support vector machines. J Sound Vib 311(3–5):886–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.09.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Yousefianmoghadam S, Behmanesh I, Stavridis A, Moaveni B, Nozari A, Sacco A (2018) System identification and modeling of a dynamically tested and gradually damaged 10-story reinforced concrete building. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47(1):25–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Yu, L, Zhu, JH, Chen, LJ (2010) Parametric study on PCA-based algorithm for structural health monitoring. 2010 prognostics and system health management conference, PHM ‘10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2010.5413428

  121. Zamani Hosseinabadi H, Amirfattahi R, Nazari B, Mirdamadi HR, Atashipour SA (2014) GUW-based structural damage detection using WPT statistical features and multiclass SVM. Appl Acoust 86:59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Zhang, J, Zhou, S (n.d.) Structure Health Monitoring in Extreme Events From Machine Learning Perspective. http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2014/Sophia.Zhou,Jingxuan Zhang,Structural Health Monitoring in Extreme Events from Machine Learning Perspective.pdf

  123. Zhang J, Sato T, Iai S, Hutchinson T (2008) A pattern recognition technique for structural identification using observed vibration signals: linear case studies. Eng Struct 30(5):1439–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Zhang X, Gao X, Lu W, He L, Li J (2021) Beyond vision: a multimodal recurrent attention convolutional neural network for unified image aesthetic prediction tasks. IEEE Trans Multimedia 23:611–623. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2020.2985526

  125. Zhou Q, Zhou H, Zhou Q, Yang F, Luo L, Li T (2015) Structural damage detection based on posteriori probability support vector machine and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Appl Soft Comput J 36:368–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Zhou C, Chase JG, Rodgers GW (2019) Degradation evaluation of lateral story stiffness using HLA-based deep learning networks. Adv Eng Inform 39(January):259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Zio E, Di Maio F (2012) Fatigue crack growth estimation by relevance vector machine. Expert Syst Appl 39(12):10681–10692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.199

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project is not supported by any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIR- Central Electronics Engineering Research Institute, Pilani, Rajasthan, 333031, India

    Prashant Kumar

  2. Academy of Scientific and Innovating Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India

    Prashant Kumar & Solomon Raju Kota

  3. CSIR - National Aerospace Laboratories, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560017, India

    Solomon Raju Kota

Authors
  1. Prashant Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Solomon Raju Kota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashant Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, P., Kota, S.R. Machine learning models in structural engineering research and a secured framework for structural health monitoring. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 7721–7759 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15853-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15853-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation