Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic pseudonyms trust-based model to protect attack scenario for internet of vehicle ad-hoc networks

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Intelligent transport systems (ITS) have evolved with the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) and the growth of advanced wireless technology associated with billions of smart devices connected to Internet. The rapidly evolving use of the Internet of Things (IoT) has led to significant growth in VANETs have transformed the traditional VANET topology into an Internet of vehicles (IoV),an improving road safety and automatic traffic monitoring to reduce issues related to traffic congestion. However, the security risk is expanding due to VANET communications’ dependence on resources such as computing as well as a lack of standards due to rapidly evolving technologies. Existing methods have proposed very limited protections in using a single pseudonym or invalidating the trust scheme that anonymous attackers can easily compromise. During vehicular communication, messages in VANET might be associated with reliability since the transaction of messages in vehicular communication needs to be comprehensive enough and secure enough to withstand the security threats by achieving trustworthiness transmission of the dynamic pseudonyms trust model (DPTM). Conversely, the severe challenge is to protect information exchange between vehicles because some malicious nodes might perform as Man-in-the-Middle (MiTM) network attackers due to dishonest vehicles in VANET. The increasing trustworthiness between nodes can thus lead to an increase in VANET’s trustworthy sharing of knowledge, privacy, security, accuracy, and authenticity. In this paper, we proposed a dynamic trust-based model in the term of dynamic pseudonyms changing scheme that first identify the honest vehicles as nodes to broadcast messages to normal vehicles on the road and secondly change their pseudonyms in only some specific zone to identify the dishonest nodes for protection assurance in the State of MiTM and Sybil attacks. Furthermore, it has addressed the use of pseudonym schemes for privacy and security requirements. All VANET nodes have built the trust given initially by the various RSUs and servers, trusted communication in the network. The experiment was performed based on various network scenarios to assess the accuracy and efficacy of the dynamic trust-based model. We have extensively evaluated performance measures of the F-Score, Recall, and Precision indices to demonstrate that the proposed model has outperformed the MARINE and PPARTM models already reported. The experimental results have verified the proposed lightweight model for certifying the recognized trust level of 40% of MiTM attackers with an F-Score of 95% compared to the MARINE model’s highest recognized detection of 90%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Algorithm 3
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data used is available in the Manuscript.

References

  1. Agrawal A, Garg A, Chaudhiri N, Gupta S, Pandey D, Roy T (2013) Security on vehicular ad hoc networks (vanet): a review paper. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 3(1):231–235

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad F, Adnane A, Kurugollu F, Hussain R (2019) A comparative analysis of trust models for safety applications in IoT-enabled vehicular networks. In: 2019 Wireless Days (WD), pp 1–8

  3. Ahmad F, Kurugollu F, Adnane A, Hussain R, Hussain F (2020) MARINE: Man-in-the-middle attack resistant trust model inconnected vehicles. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 7(4):3310–3322

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed S, Rehman MU, AtifIshtiaq SK, Ali A, Begum S (2018) VANSec: attack-resistant VANET security algorithm in terms of trust computation error and normalized routing overhead. J Sens 2018:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6576841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed, N, Deng Z, Memon I, Hassan F, Mohammadani KH, Iqbal R (2022) "A survey on location privacy attacks and prevention deployed with IoT in vehicular networks." Wirel Commun Mob Comput

  6. Al Junaid MAH, Syed AA, Warip MNM, Azir KNFK, Romli NH (2018) Classification of security attacks in VANET: A review of requirements and perspectives. MATEC Web Conf 150:6038

    Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Kahtani MS (2012) Survey on security attacks in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs). In: Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS), 2012 6th International Conference, pp 1–9

  8. Al-Turjman F, Lemayian JP (2020) Intelligence, security, and vehicular sensor networks in internet of things (IoT)-enabled smart-cities: an overview. Comput Electr Eng 87:106776

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arain QA et al (2017) Privacy protection with dynamic pseudonym-based multiple mix-zones over road networks. China Commun 14(4):89–100

    Google Scholar 

  10. Asghar M, Doss RRM, Pan L (2018) A scalable and efficient PKI based authentication protocol for VANETs. In: 2018 28th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC), pp 1–3

  11. Buttyán L, Holczer T, Weimerskirch A, Whyte W (2009) Slow: A practical pseudonym changing scheme for location privacy in vanets. In: 2009 IEEE Vehicular Network Conf (VNC), pp 1–8

  12. Cavalcanti ER, de Souza JAR, Spohn MA, Gomes RC d M, da Costa AFBF (2018) VANETs’ research over the past decade: overview, credibility, and trends. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 48(2):31–39

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen C, Zhang J, Cohen R, Ho PH (2010) A trust-based message propagation and evaluation framework in vanets. In Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Information Technology Convergence and Services. 2010. https://personal.ntu.edu.sg/zhangj/paper/ifiptm10-chen.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen C, Zhang J, Cohen R, Ho PH (2010) A trust modeling framework for message propagation and evaluation in VANETs. 2010 2nd International Conference on Information Technology Convergence and Services. IEEE, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITCS.2010.5581298

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen J-M, Li T-T, Panneerselvam J (2018) DPTMEC: a trust management based on evidence combination on attack-resistant and collaborative internet of vehicles. IEEE Access 7:148913–148922

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chukwuocha C, Thulasiraman P, Thulasiram RK (2021) Trust and scalable blockchain-based message exchanging scheme on VANET. Peer-to-Peer Network Appl:1–18

  17. De Fuentes JM, González-Tablas AI, Ribagorda A (2011) Overview of security issues in vehicular ad-hoc networks. In: Handbook of research on mobility and computing: Evolving technologies and ubiquitous impacts. IGI Global:894–911

  18. Deshpande A (2021) Review of Effective Trust Management Systems in VANET Environments. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing 14(1):1771–1780

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dotzer F, Fischer L, Magiera P (2005) Vars: A vehicle ad-hoc network reputation system. In: Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks, pp 454–456

  20. Eltahir Amal A, Saeed Rashid A, Mukherjee Amitava, Hasan Mohammad Kamrul (2016) Evaluation and analysis of an enhanced hybrid wireless mesh protocol for vehicular ad hoc network. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2016(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-016-0666-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Emara K, Woerndl W, Schlichter J (2016) Context-based pseudonym changing scheme for vehicular adhoc networks. arXiv Prepr. arXiv1607.07656

  22. Fabian P, Rachedi A, Guéguen C (2020) Programmable objective function for data transportation in the internet of vehicles. Trans Emerg Telecommun Technol 31(5):e3882

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fan N, Wu CQ (2018) On trust models for communication security in vehicular ad-hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw

  24. Förster D, Kargl F, Löhr H (2016) PUCA: a pseudonym scheme with strong privacy guarantees for vehicular ad-hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw 37:122–132

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gerlach M (2007) Trust for vehicular applications. In: Eighth International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems (ISADS’07), pp 295–304

  26. Guerrero-Ibáñez JA, Flores-Cortés C, Zeadally S (2013) Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs): Architecture, protocols and applications. In: Chilamkurti N, Zeadally S, Chaouchi H (eds) Next-generation Wireless Technologies. Springer, London, pp 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5164-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Gurung S, Lin D, Squicciarini AC, Bertino A (2013) Information-oriented trustworthiness evaluation in vehicular ad-hoc networks. Proc. 7th Int. Conf.Network Syst. Secur. (NSS), pp 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38631-2_8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Halabi T, Zulkernine M (2019) Trust-based cooperative game model for secure collaboration in the internet of vehicles. In: ICC 2019–2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp 1–6

  29. Hartenstein Hannes, Laberteaux LP (2008) A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 46(6):164–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2008.4539481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hasan MK, Ahmed MM, Musa SS, Islam S, Abdullah SN, Hossain E, Nafi NS, Vo N (2021) An improved dynamic thermal current rating model for PMU-based wide area measurement framework for reliability analysis utilizing sensor cloud system. IEEE Access 18(9):14446–14458

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hasrouny H, Samhat AE, Bassil C, Laouiti A (2019) Trust model for secure group leader-based communications in VANET. Wireless Networks 25:4639–4661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1756-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahmed H, Abdel-Hamid A, El-Nasr MA (2011) A dynamic key distribution protocol for PKI-based VANETs. In 2011 IFIP Wireless Days (WD). IEEE, pp 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/WD.2011.6098221

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Iqbal R, Butt TA, Afzaal M, Salah K (2019) Trust management in social internet of vehicles: factors, challenges, blockchain, and fog solutions. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 15(1):1550147719825820

    Google Scholar 

  34. Islam S, Hashim AH, Habaebi MH, Hasan MK (2017) Design and implementation of a multihoming-based scheme to support mobility management in NEMO. Wirel Pers Commun 95(2):457–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3903-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Islam S, Khalifa OO, Hashim AH, Hasan MK, Razzaque MA, Pandey B (2020) Design and evaluation of a multihoming-based mobility management scheme to support inter technology handoff in PNEMO. Wirel Pers Commun 114(2):1133–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07412-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Javed AR, Rehman SU, Khan MU, Alazab M, Reddy T (2021) CANintelliIDS: detecting in-vehicle intrusion attacks on a controller area network using CNN and attention-based GRU. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng 8(2):1456–1466. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2021.3059881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jayasinghe, U, Otebolaku A, Um T-W, Lee GM (2017) Data centric trust evaluation and prediction framework for IoT. In: 2017 ITU kaleidoscope: challenges for a data-driven society (ITU K), IEEE, pp 1–7

  38. Junejo, MH, et al (2020) A privacy-preserving attack-resistant trust model for internet of vehicles ad hoc networks. Sci Program 2020

  39. Junejo MH, Ab Rahman AAH, Shaikh RA, Yusof KM, Kumar D, Memon I (2021) Lightweight trust model with machine learning scheme for secure privacy in VANET. Procedia Comput Sci 194:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.10.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kerrache CA, Calafate CT, Cano J-C, Lagraa N, Manzoni P (2016) Trust management for vehicular networks: an adversary-oriented overview. IEEE Access 4:9293–9307

    Google Scholar 

  41. Khan U, Agrawal S, Silakari S (2015) Detection of malicious nodes (dmn) in vehicular ad-hoc networks. Procedia Comput Sci 46:965–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Krajzewicz D, Hertkorn G, Rössel C, Wagner P (2002) SUMO (Simulation of Urban MObility)-an open-source traffic simulation. In Proceedings of the 4th middle East Symposium on Simulation and Modelling (MESM20002). pp 183–187. https://elib.dlr.de/6661/

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kumari S, Karuppiah M, Li X, Wu F, Das AK, Odelu V (2016) An enhanced and secure trust-extended authentication mechanism for vehicular ad-hoc networks. Secur Commun Netw 9(17):4255–4271

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li W, Song H (2016) ART: an attack-resistant trust management scheme for securing vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 17(4):960–969. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2494017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Li H, Pei L, Liao D, Sun G, Du X (2019) Blockchain meets VANET: an architecture for identity and location privacy protection in VANET. Peer-to-Peer Network Appl 12(5):1178–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-019-00786-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Li H, Pei L, Liao D, Sun G, Xu D (2019) Blockchain meets VANET: an architecture for identity and location privacy protection in VANET. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 12(5):1178–1193

    Google Scholar 

  47. Li W, Song W, Lu Q, Yue C (2020) Reliable congestion control mechanism for safety applications in urban VANETs. Ad Hoc Netw 98:102033

    Google Scholar 

  48. Liao D, Sun G, Zhang M, Chang V, Li H (2017) Towards location and trajectory privacy preservation in 5G vehicular social network. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC), pp 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSE-EUC.2017.197

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Liao D, Li H, Sun G, Zhang M, Chang V (2018) Location and trajectory privacy preservation in 5G-Enabled vehicle social network services. J Netw Comput Appl 110:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu Z, Ma J, Jiang Z, Zhu H, Miao Y (2016) LSOT: a lightweight self-organized trust model in VANETs. Mob Inf Syst: 2016

  51. Liu Y, Liu F, Gao Y, Zhao L (2018) Implementation and analysis of tightly coupled global navigation satellite system precise point positioning/inertial navigation system (GNSS PPP/INS) with insufficient satellites for land vehicle navigation. Sens 18(12):4305

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lo N-W, Tsai H-C (2009) A reputation system for traffic safety event on vehicular ad hoc networks. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2009(1):125348. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/125348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lu R, Lin X, Luan TH, Liang X, Shen X (2011) Pseudonym changing at social spots: an effective strategy for location privacy in vanets. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 61(1):86–96

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lu Z, Liu W, Wang Q, Qu G, Liu Z (2018) A privacy-preserving trust model based on blockchain for vanets. IEEE Access 6:45655–45664

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mansour MB, Salama C, Mohamed HK, Hammad SA (2018) VANET security and privacy-an overview. Int J Netw Secur Its Appl:10

  56. Mármol FG, Pérez GM (2012) TRIP, a trust and reputation infrastructure-based proposal for vehicular ad hoc networks. J Netw Comput Appl 35(3):934–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2011.03.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Memon I (2015) A secure and efficient communication scheme with authenticated key establishment protocol for road networks. Wirel Pers Commun 85(3):1167–1191

    Google Scholar 

  58. Memon I (2018) Distance and clustering-based energy-efficient pseudonyms changing strategy over road network. Int J Commun Syst 31(11):e3704

    Google Scholar 

  59. Memon I, Arain QA (2017) Dynamic path privacy protection framework for continuous query service over road networks. World Wide Web 20(4):639–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-016-0403-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Memon I, Mirza HT (2018) MADPTM: mix zones and dynamic pseudonym trust management system for location privacy. Int J Commun Syst 31(17):e3795. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Memon I et al (2018) Pseudonym changing strategy with multiple mix zones for trajectory privacy protection in road networks. Int J Commun Syst 31(1):e3437. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Memon I, Memon H, Arain QA (2021) Pseudonym changing strategy with mix zones based authentication protocol for location privacy in road networks. Wirel Pers Commun 116(4):3309–3329

    Google Scholar 

  63. Memon I, Hasan MK, Shaikh RA, Nebhen J, Bakar KAA, Hossain E, Tunio MH (2021) Energy-efficient fuzzy management system for internet of things connected vehicular ad hoc networks. Electron 10(9):1068

    Google Scholar 

  64. Minhas UF, Zhang J, Tran T, Cohen R (2011) A multifaceted approach to modeling agent trust for effective communication in the application of mobile ad hoc vehicular networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man, Cybern Part C (Applications Rev) 41(3):407–420

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mishra B, Panigrahy SK, Tripathy TC, Jena D, Jena SK (2011) A secure and efficient message authentication protocol for VANETs with privacy preservation. In: 2011 World Congress Inf Commun Technol, pp 880–885

  66. Mokhtar B, Azab M (2015) Survey on security issues in vehicular ad hoc networks. Alexandria Eng J 54(4):1115–1126

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mondal A, Mitra S (2016) TDMAC: A timestamp defined message authentication code for secure data dissemination in VANET. In: Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS), 2016 IEEE Int Conf, pp 1–6

  68. Muniyandi RC, Qamar F, Jasim AN (2020) Genetic optimized location aided routing protocol for VANET based on rectangular estimation of position. Appl Sci 10(17):5759. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Nafi NS, Hasan MK, Abdallah AH (2012) Traffic flow model for vehicular network. In: In2012 international conference on computer and communication engineering (ICCCE), vol 3. IEEE, pp 738–743

    Google Scholar 

  70. Nurelmadina N, Hasan MK, Memon I, Saeed RA, Zainol Ariffin KA, Ali ES, Mokhtar RA, Islam S, Hossain E, Hassan M (2021) A systematic review on cognitive radio in low power wide area network for industrial IoT applications. Sustain 13(1):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Pan Y, Li J (2013) Cooperative pseudonym change scheme based on the number of neighbors in VANETs. J Netw Comput Appl 36(6):1599–1609

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  72. Parno B, Perrig A (2005) Challenges in securing vehicular networks. In: Workshop on hot topics in networks (HotNets-IV), pp 1–6. http://conferences.sigcomm.org/hotnets/2005/papers/parno.pdf

  73. Patwardhan A, Joshi A, Finin T, Yesha Y (2006) A data intensive reputation management scheme for vehicular ad hoc networks. In: 2006 3rd Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems-Workshops, IEEE, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MOBIQW.2006.361754

  74. Petit J, Schaub F, Feiri M, Kargl F (2014) Pseudonym schemes in vehicular networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 17(1):228–255

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rai IA, Shaikh RA, Hassan SR (2020) A hybrid dual-mode trust management scheme for vehicular networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 16(7):1550147720939372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147720939372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ravi Chandrasekar, Anmol Tigga G, Reddy Thippa, Hakak Saqib, Alazab Mamoun (2022) Driver identification using optimized deep learning model in smart transportation. ACM Trans Internet Technol 22(4):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3412353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ravie CM et al (2021) An improved harmony search algorithm for proactive routing protocol in VANET. J Adv Transp (2021)

  78. Raya M, Papadimitratos P, Gligor VD, Hubaux J-P (2008) “On data-centric trust establishment in ephemeral ad hoc networks. In: INFOCOM 2008. The 27th conference on computer communications, IEEE, pp 1238–1246

  79. Salem AH, Abdel-Hamid A, El-Nasr MA (2016) The case for dynamic key distribution for PKI-based VANETS. arXiv Prepr. arXiv1605.04696

  80. Samara G, Al-Raba’nah Y (2017) Security issues in vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET): a survey. arXiv Prepr. arXiv1712.04263

  81. Sedjelmaci H, Senouci SM (2015) An accurate and efficient collaborative intrusion detection framework to secure vehicular networks. Comput Electr Eng 43:33–47

    Google Scholar 

  82. Sengar JS (2015) SURVEY: reputation and trust management in VANETs. Int J Grid Distrib Comput 8(4):301–306. https://www.earticle.net/Article/A253964

    Google Scholar 

  83. Shaikh RA, Alzahrani AS (2013) Trust management method for vehicular ad hoc networks. In: Singh K, Awasthi AK (eds) Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness in Heterogeneous Networks. QShine 2013. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 115. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37949-9_70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  84. Shaikh RA, Alzahrani AS (2014) Intrusion-aware trust model for vehicular ad hoc networks. Secur Commun Networks 7(11):1652–1669

    Google Scholar 

  85. Sharma S, Sparsh, Kaul A (2021) VANETs cloud: architecture, applications, challenges, and issues. Arch Computation Method Eng 28:2081–2102

    Google Scholar 

  86. Sheikh MS, Liang J (2019) A comprehensive survey on VANET security services in traffic management system. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2019:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2423915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Shrivastava S (2019) V2V vehicle safety communication. In: Connected Vehicles, Springer, pp 117–155

  88. Soleymani SA et al (2021) A security and privacy scheme based on node and message authentication and trust in fog-enabled VANET. Vehicular Commun 29:100335

    Google Scholar 

  89. Sumra IA, Akhtar AN (2020) Applications of internet of vehicle (IoV): a survey. LGURJCSIT 4(2):59–70

    Google Scholar 

  90. Sun Y, Zhang B, Zhao B, Su X, Su J (2015) Mix-zones optimal deployment for protecting location privacy in VANET. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 8(6):1108–1121

    Google Scholar 

  91. Sun A, Rui, YH, Zhu L (2021) Communication by credence: trust communication in vehicular ad hoc networks. Mob Netw Appl 2021:1–13

  92. Tajeddine A, Kayssi A, Chehab A (2010) A privacy-preserving trust model for VANETs. In: 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. IEEE, pp 832–837. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIT.2010.157

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  93. Tangade SS, Manvi SS (2013) A survey on attacks, security and trust management solutions in VANETs. In: 2013 Fourth international conference on computing, communications and networking technologies (ICCCNT), IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2013.6726668

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  94. Sommer, C, Eckhoff S, Brummer A, Buse DS, Hagenauer F, Joerer S, Segata M (2019) Veins: The open source vehicular network simulation framework. Recent Advances in Network Simulation: The OMNeT++ Environment and its Ecosystem 215–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12842-5_6

  95. Wang S, Yao N (2019) A RSU-aided distributed trust framework for pseudonym-enabled privacy preservation in VANETs. Wirel Netw 25(3):1099–1115

    Google Scholar 

  96. Wang J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Gu X (2016) RPRep: a robust and privacy-preserving reputation management scheme for pseudonym-enabled VANETs. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 12(3):6138251

    Google Scholar 

  97. Wang C, Shen J, Lai J-F, Liu J (2020) B-TSCA: Blockchain assisted trustworthiness scalable computation for V2I authentication in VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 9(3):1386–1396. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2020.2978866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Yan X et al (2021) A kind of event trust model for VANET based on statistical method. Wirel Pers Commun 118(1):489–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-08027-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Yang N (2013) A similarity based trust and reputation management framework for vanets. Int J Futur Gener Commun Netw 6(2):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  100. Zhang J (2011) A survey on trust management for vanets, in Advanced information networking and applications (AINA). IEEE Int Conf 2011:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  101. Zhao H, Sun D, Yue H, Zhao M, Cheng S (2018) Dynamic trust model for vehicular cyber-physical systems. IJ Netw Secur 20(1):157–167

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Computer Science, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan

    Imran Memon, Riaz Ahmed Shaikh & Hidayatullah Shaikh

Authors
  1. Imran Memon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Riaz Ahmed Shaikh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hidayatullah Shaikh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imran Memon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

“The authors declare no conflict of interest.”

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Memon, I., Shaikh, R.A. & Shaikh, H. Dynamic pseudonyms trust-based model to protect attack scenario for internet of vehicle ad-hoc networks. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 13395–13426 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16110-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16110-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation