Skip to main content
Log in

An adaptive neuro fuzzy methodology for the diagnosis of prenatal hypoplastic left heart syndrome from ultrasound images

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Congenital heart defect (CHD) is one of the most serious congenital deformities in a fetus. About 31% to 55% of CHDs are the primary cause that leads to life-threatening problem among neonates, hence sonographers emphasize the importance of prenatal CHD screening. Among 18 types of CHDs, the asymmetric appearance of the heart seems to be a challenging part. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is a critical and rare CHD, with an underdeveloped left heart chamber of the fetus. This prenatal CHD can be diagnosed between 17 to 21 weeks of gestation period. Though ultrasound provides a good diagnostic result, prenatal diagnosis is still a challenging area due to its speckle noise and irregular appearance of the heart chambers. In this context, the basic step is to appropriately select the pre-processing algorithm, one such algorithm is the Fuzzy based maximum likelihood estimation technique (FMLET). Right ventricle left ventricle ratio (RVLVR) and cardiac thoracic ratio (CTR) are the two important features required for manual diagnosis of the ultrasound images. Hence, morphological operations such as open, close, thinning and thickening helps to extract the diagnostically important features inherent in the images. Finally, the computer aided decision support (CADS) system is designed with pre-processing module, morphological module and adaptive neuro fuzzy (ANFC) classifier module. ANFC is investigated as the good classifiers to help the experts in terms of self-learning with higher diagnostic rate. The proposed CADS proven with 91% of diagnostic accuracy and the standardized area under the ROC curve obtained was 0.9137.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Pouch AM, Aly AH, Lasso A, Nguyen AV, Scanlan AB (2017) Image Segmentation and Modeling of the Pediatric Tricuspid Valve in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. Funct Imaging Model Heart 10263:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59448-4_10 Epub 2017 May 23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee JS (1986) Speckle suppression and analysis for synthetic aperture radar images. Opt Eng 25(5):255636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fruitman DS (2000) Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: prognosis and management options. Paediatr Child Health 5(4):219–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/5.4.219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellsham-Revell H (2021) Noninvasive Imaging in Interventional Cardiology: Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.637838, volume 8

  5. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(12):1890e1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gobergs R, Salputra E, Lubaua I (2016) Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a review. Acta Medica Lituanica 23(2):86–98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Carvalho JS, Mavrides E, Shinebourne EA, Campbell S, Thilaganathan B (2002) Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects. Heart 88(4):387e391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammed NB, Chinnaiya A (2011) Evolution of foetal echocardiography as a screening tool for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. J Pak Med Assoc 61(9):904–909

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frost VS, Stiles JA, Shanmugan KS, Holtzman JC (1982) A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2:157e166

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coupé P, Hellier P, Kervrann C, Barillot C (2009) Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Image Process 18(10):2221e2229

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Sridevi S, Nirmala S (2016) Fuzzy inference rule-based image despeckling using adaptive maximum likelihood estimation. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31(1):433e441

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ciurte A, Rueda S, Bresson X, Nedevschi S, Papageorghiou AT, Noble JA, Bach Cuadra M (2012) Ultrasound image segmentation of the fetal abdomen: a semi-supervised patch-based approach, in: Proceedings of Challenge US: Biometric Measurements from Fetal Ultrasound Images, ISBI, pp. 13e15

  13. Nirmala S, Sridevi S (2016) Markov random field segmentation based sonographic identification of prenatal ventricular septal defect. Procedi Comput Sci 79:344–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aysal TC, Barner KE (2007) Rayleigh-maximum-likelihood filtering for speckle reduction of ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26(5):712e727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadek S, Al-Hamadi A (2015) Entropic image segmentation: a fuzzy approach based on Tsallis entropy. Int J Comput Vis Signal Process 5(1):1e7

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Soille, Morphological image analysis: principles and applications, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

  17. Michielsen K, De Raedt H (2001) Integral-geometry morphological image analysis. Phys Rep 347:461–538

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Banon, GJF, Barrera, J, de Mendonça Braga-Neto, U (2007) Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, mathematical morphology and its applications to signal and image processing, proceedings of the 8th international symposium on mathematical, October 10–13

  19. Abdulshahed AM, Longstaff AP, Fletcher S (2015) The application of ANFIS prediction models for thermal error compensation on CNC machine tools. Appl Soft Comput 27:158e168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.012

  20. Loizou CP, Pattichis CS, Pantziaris M, Tyllis T, Nicolaides A (2006) Quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging in the carotid artery based on normalization and speckle reduction filtering. Med Biol Eng Comput 44(5):414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Marsico M, Nappi M, Riccio D (2015) Entropy-based automatic segmentation and extraction of tumors from brain MRI images, in: International conference on computer analysis of images and patterns, Springer, Cham, pp. 195e206

  22. Macedo AJ, Ferreira M, Borges A, Sampaio A, Ferraz F, Sampayo F, Fetal echocardiography. (1993) The results of a 3-year study. Acta Medica Port 6(Suppl 1):I9-13

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sridevi S, Nirmala S (2015) ANFIS based decision support system for prenatal detection of truncus arteriosus congenital heart defect, Appl Soft Comput J, ASOC-3182

  24. Bonnet D (2021) Impacts of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases on outcomes. Transl Pediatr 10(8):2241–2249. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-267

  25. Huiling W, Bingzheng W, Lai F, Liu P, Lyu G, He S, Dai J Application of artificial intelligence in anatomical structure recognition of standard section of fetal heart, computational and mathematical methods in medicine. Hindawi 2023:5650378. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5650378

  26. Luo Y, Zhenkun L, Lu L, Longzhong L, Qinghua H (2023) Deep fusion of human-machine knowledge with attention mechanism for breast cancer diagnosis. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104784

  27. Huang Q, Yang J, Feng X (2020) Automated trading point forecasting based on bicluster mining and fuzzy inference. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang Q, Wang D, Lu Z, Zhuo S, Li J, Liu L, Chang C (2023) A novel image-to-knowledge inference approach for automatically diagnosing tumors. Expert Systems with Applications 229:120450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120450

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Geetha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kavitha, D., Geetha, S. & Geetha, R. An adaptive neuro fuzzy methodology for the diagnosis of prenatal hypoplastic left heart syndrome from ultrasound images. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 30755–30772 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16682-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16682-2

Keywords

Navigation