Skip to main content
Log in

RSA based improved YOLOv3 network for segmentation and detection of weed species

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weeds are among the major risks impacting agricultural production and quality, it is still difficult to create reliable weed identification and detection systems because of the unstructured field circumstances and substantial biological heterogeneity of weeds. The proposed work develops a weed detection model for achieving higher crop yield. Crop and weed images are taken as an input for the proposed method. The collection of data consists of raw-data that cannot produce high accuracy. So, a certain pre-processing technique is used in the proposed method for achieving high accuracy. Adaptive median filter, adaptive gamma correction and high boost filtering techniques are used as pre-processing techniques for noise removal, contrast enhancement and edge sharpening. Then the pre-processed image is segmented and detected according to the features and properties of the pixels in the image. Improved YOLOv3-technique is used in the proposed approach for segmentation and detection of weed species. RSA-optimization is used to select the hyperparameters of YOLOv3-optimally. The proposed method is tested with several metrics which attain better performance like 96% accuracy, 96% precision, 95% recall, 4% error and 95% specificity value. Thus the designed model detects weed-species in an effective manner and it is useful for achieving higher crop production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Algorithm 1.
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. You J, Liu W, Lee J (2020) A DNN-based semantic segmentation for detecting weed and crop. Comput Electron Agric 178:105750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajasekhara Babu L, Thangamani M, Surendiran R, Ganthimathi M, Gomathi B, Satheesh S (2023) Construction and Integration of Knowledge Grid in Agricultural Information Management Services. Int J Eng Trends Technol 71(4):359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sampathkumar S, Rajeswari R (2022) An Automated Crop and Plant Disease Identification Scheme Using Cognitive Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm. IETE J Res 68(5):3786–3797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gai J, Tang L, Steward BL (2020) Automated crop plant detection based on the fusion of color and depth images for robotic weed control. J Field Robot 37(1):35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasan AM, Sohel F, Diepeveen D, Laga H, Jones MG (2021) A survey of deep learning techniques for weed detection from images. Comput Electron Agric 184:106067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabzi S, Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y, Arribas JI (2020) An automatic visible-range video weed detection, segmentation and classification prototype in potato field. Heliyon 6(5):e03685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jin X, Che J, Chen Y (2021) Weed identification using deep learning and image processing in vegetable plantation. IEEE Access 9:10940–10950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Espejo-Garcia B, Mylonas N, Athanasakos L, Fountas S, Vasilakoglou I (2020) Towards weeds identification assistance through transfer learning. Comput Electron Agric 171:105306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karthick S (2017) Semi Supervised Hierarchy Forest Clustering and KNN Based Metric Learning Technique for Machine Learning System. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems 9:2679–2690

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang A, Xu Y, Wei X, Cui B (2020) Semantic segmentation of crop and weed using an encoder-decoder network and image enhancement method under uncontrolled outdoor illumination. IEEE Access 8:81724–81734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fawakherji M, Youssef A, Bloisi D, Pretto A, Nardi D (2019) Crop and Weeds Classification for Precision Agriculture Using Context-Independent Pixel-Wise Segmentation. In Proceedings of 2019 Third IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC), Naples, Italy, pp. 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRC.2019.00029

  12. Kiruthika K, Priyanka V (2015) Co-segmentation of similar foreground images using graphcut. Int J Appl Eng Res 10(20):19536–19541

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vaidhehi M, Malathy C (2022) An unique model for weed and paddy detection using regional convolutional neural networks. Acta Agric Scand Sect Soil Plant Sci 72(1):463–75

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yan X, Deng X, Jin J (2020) Classification of weed species in the paddy field with DCNN-Learned features. In Proceedings of 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC) pp. 336–340. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITOEC49072.2020.9141894

  15. Zhang S, Huang W, Wang Z (2021) Combing modified Grabcut, K-means clustering and sparse representation classification for weed recognition in wheat field. Neurocomputing 452:665–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Che’Ya NN, Dunwoody E, Gupta M, (2021) Assessment of weed classification using Hyperspectral reflectance and optimal multispectral UAV imagery. Agronomy 11(7):1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dadashzadeh M, Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y, Mesri-Gundoshmian T, Sabzi S, Hernández-Hernández JL, Hernández-Hernández M, Arribas JI (2020) Weed classification for site-specific weed management using an automated stereo computer-vision machine-learning system in rice fields. Plants 9(5):559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Subeesh A, Bhole S, Singh K, Chandel NS, Rajwade YA, Rao KVR, Jat D (2022) Deep convolutional neural network models for weed detection in polyhouse grown bell peppers. Artif Intell Agric 6:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ponraj DN, Jenifer ME, Poongodi P, Manoharan JS (2011) A survey on the preprocessing techniques of mammogram for the detection of breast cancer. J Emerg Trends Comput Inf Sci 2(12):656–664

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sahnoun M, Kallel F, Dammak M, Kammoun O, Mhiri C, Ben Mahfoudh K, Ben Hamida A (2020) Spinal cord MRI contrast enhancement using adaptive gamma correction for patient with multiple sclerosis. SIViP 14:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patil SB, Patil BP (2020) Automatic Detection of microaneurysms in retinal fundus images using modified high boost filtering, line detectors and OC-SVM. In Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on Industry 4.0 Technology (I4Tech), IEEE, Pune, India, pp. 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/I4Tech48345.2020.9102677

  22. Lu Z, Lu J, Ge Q, Zhan T (2019) Multi-object detection method based on YOLO and ResNet hybrid networks. In: 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM); Jul 827–832; IEEE, Toyonaka, Japan

  23. Abualigah L, Abd Elaziz M, Sumari P, Geem ZW, Gandomi AH (2022) Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA): A nature-inspired meta-heuristic optimizer. Expert Syst Appl 191:116158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dataset 1: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ravirajsinh45/crop-and-weed-detection-data-with-bounding-boxes. Accessed 3 Jan 2023

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The corresponding author claims the major contribution of the paper including formulation, analysis and editing. The co-authors provide guidance to verify the analysis result and manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Muthukumaran.

Ethics declarations

Declarations

This article is a completely original work of its authors; it has not been published before and will not be sent to other publications until the journal’s editorial board decides not to accept it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madanan, M., Muthukumaran, N., Tiwari, S. et al. RSA based improved YOLOv3 network for segmentation and detection of weed species. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 34913–34942 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16739-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16739-2

Keywords

Navigation