Abstract
For the angle estimation demand of real-world electromagnetic vector sensor (EMVS) array radar, in this paper we propose a two-dimensional direction of arrival (2D-DOA) estimation method with spatially separated “long” crossed-dipoles array based on three-way compressive sensing. First, the low-dimension random matrix is utilized to compressively sample the received data in tensor style. Second, the compressed factor matrices are achieved through parallel factor decomposition. Third, the cosines’ estimations are derived from the support locations of sparse vectors recovered with orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm. Finally, 2D-DOA estimation is calculated according to the relationship between cosines. Compared with the traditional ESPRIT method, the proposed method can estimate parameters with higher accuracy under the condition of low signal-to-noise ratio and a few number of snapshots, which is conducive to improve the robustness of angle estimation with real-world EMVS array radar.








Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bertrand, A., & Moonen, M. (2012). Low-complexity distributed total least squares estimation in ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 60(8), 4321–4333.
Bro, R., Sidiropoulos, N. D., & Giannakis, G. B. (1999). A fast least squares algorithm for separating trilinear mixtures. In Proceedings of international workshop independent component analysis and blind signal separation (pp. 289–294).
Capon, J. (1969). High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 57(8), 1408–1418.
Carroll, J. D., Pruzansky, S., & Kruskal, J. B. (1980). Candelinc: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters. Psychometrika, 45(1), 3–24.
Han, K., & Nehorai, A. (2014). Nested vector-sensor array processing via tensor modeling. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62(10), 2542–2553.
Khan, S., & Wong, K. T. (2019). Electrically long dipoles in a crossed pair for closed-form estimation of an incident source’s polarization. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 67(8), 5569–5581.
Khan, S., & Wong, K. T. (2020). A six-component vector sensor comprising electrically long dipoles and large loops—to simultaneously estimate incident sources’ directions-of-arrival and polarizations. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 68(8), 6355–6363.
Khan, S., Wong, K. T., Song, Y., & Tam, W. (2018). Large circular loops in the estimation of an incident emitter’s direction-of-arrival or polarization. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 66(6), 3046–3055.
Kolda, T. G., & Bader, B. W. (2009). Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Review, 51(3), 455–500.
Li, B., Bai, W., Zhang, Q., Zheng, G., Bai, J., & Fu, X. (2018). High accuracy and unambiguous 2D-DOA estimation with a uniform planar array of “long” electric-dipoles. IEEE Access, 6(1), 40559–40568.
Li, B., Chen, H., Liu, W., Zhang, Z., & Zhou, B. (2021). Joint multi-dimensional parameters estimation with large-size electromagnetic vector sensor array based on sparse reconstruction in limited snapshots. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 43(4), 868–874.
Li, J., & Compton, R. T. (1991). Angle and polarization estimation using ESPRIT with a polarization sensitive array. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 39(9), 1376–1383.
Liu, B., Li, B., Feng, Y., Zheng, G., & Yin, Z. (2019). Vector-cross-product-based 2D-DOA and polarization estimation with “long” electric-dipole quint. IEEE Access, 7, 27075–27085.
Nehorai, A., & Paldi, E. (1994). Vector-sensor array processing for electromagnetic source localization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 42(2), 376–398.
Pati, Y. C., Rezaiifar, R., & Krishnaprasad, P. S. (1993). Orthogonal matching pursuit: Recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In Proceedings of 27th Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers (1), (pp. 40–44).
Rao, W., Li, D., & Zhang, J. Q. (2018). A tensor-based approach to L-shaped arrays processing with enhanced degrees of freedom. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 25(2), 1–5.
Roemer, F., Ibrahim, M., Alieiev, R., Landmann, M., Thomae, R. S., & Galdo, G. D. (2014). Polarimetric compressive sensing based DOA estimation. In 18th international ITG workshop on smart antennas (WSA) (pp. 1–8).
Schmidt, R. (1986). Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 34(3), 276–280.
Song, Y., Hu, G., Zheng, G., & Li, B. (2020). ESPRIT-based DOA estimation with spatially spread long dipoles and/or large loops. Circuits Systems and Signal Processing, 39(3), 5568–5587.
Trees, H. L. V. (2002). Optimum array processing, Part IV: Detection estimation and modulation theory. Wiley.
Wen, F., Shi, J., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Joint 2D-DOD, 2D-DOA, and polarization angles estimation for bistatic EMVS-MIMO radar via PARAFAC analysis. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(2), 1626–1638.
Wong, K. T., Song, Y., Fulton, C. J., Khan, S., & Tam, W. Y. (2017). Electrically “long” dipoles in a collocated/orthogonal triad–for direction finding and polarization estimation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 65(11), 6057–6067.
Wu, N., Qu, Z., Si, W., et al. (2018). Joint estimation of DOA and polarization based on phase difference analysis of electromagnetic vector sensor array. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 29, 597–620.
Xie, Q., Pan, X., Chen, J., & Xiao, S. (2021). Joint angle and polarization parameter estimation for the new designed bistatic multiple-input multiple-output radar with long dipoles and large loops. Acta Physica Sinica, 70(4), 044302.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62001510.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 A. Derivation for signal modeling based on matrix style
The common received data can be expressed as in matrix style (Li et al., 2018)
Transposing both sides of (39), we can obtain
According to (5) and (6) in Definition 3, (40) can be transformed into the following tensor form
1.2 B. Derivation for CRB
The CRB is only related to the array form, not to the type of estimation algorithm. Therefore, we will still use the traditional matrix method to derive the CRB. Denote \({{\varvec{\uptheta}}} = [\theta_{1} ,\theta_{2} , \ldots ,\theta_{K} ]\) and \({\varvec{\phi}} = [\phi_{1} ,\phi_{2} , \ldots ,\phi_{K} ]\). Then the Fisher information matrix can be given by
Since we assume that the source is a random unknown signal, according to Trees (2002), the subarray in Fisher information matrix can be expressed as
where \({\text{Tr}}( \cdot )\) denotes the trace of a matrix, R denotes covariance matrix of the received data (in matrix form)
where \({\mathbf{d}}_{k} { = }{\mathbf{q}}_{x} (u_{k} ) \otimes {\mathbf{q}}_{y} (v_{k} ) \otimes {\mathbf{b}}_{k}\) denotes the joint steer vector, \({\mathbf{I}}_{2MN}\) denotes an \(2MN \times 2MN\) identity matrix, \(\sigma_{{s_{k} }}^{2}\) and \(\sigma_{n}^{2}\) represent the power of the signal and noise, respectively. The first-order partial derivatives of the covariance matrix \({\mathbf{R}}\) with respect to \(\theta_{k}\) and \(\phi_{k}\) are given by
The detailed derivation process of \(\frac{{\partial {\mathbf{d}}_{k} }}{{\partial \theta_{k} }}\) and \(\frac{{\partial {\mathbf{d}}_{k} }}{{\partial \phi_{k} }}\) are given as follows
Substituting (45)–(47) and (60) into (43), we can calculate the Fisher information matrix \({\mathbf{J}}\). Then the CRB of the two parameters can be given by
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, B., Zeng, L., Liu, W. et al. 2D-DOA estimation with spatially separated “long” crossed-dipoles array based on three-way compressive sensing. Multidim Syst Sign Process 33, 1087–1104 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-022-00832-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-022-00832-0