Abstract
Natural proteins quickly fold into a complicated three-dimensional structure. Evolutionary algorithms have been used to predict the native structure with the lowest energy conformation of the primary sequence of a given protein. Successful structure prediction requires a free energy function sufficiently close to the true potential for the native state, as well as a method for exploring the conformational space. Protein structure prediction is a challenging problem because current potential functions have limited accuracy and the conformational space is vast. In this work, we show an innovative approach to the protein folding (PF) problem based on an hybrid Immune Algorithm (IMMALG) and a quasi-Newton method starting from a population of promising protein conformations created by the global optimizer DIRECT. The new method has been tested on Met-Enkephelin peptide, which is a paradigmatic example of multiple–minima problem, 1POLY, 1ROP and the three helix protein 1BDC. DIRECT produces an initial population of promising candidate solutions within a potentially optimal rectangle for the funnel landscape of the PF problem. Hence, IMMALG starts from a population of promising protein conformations created by the global optimizer DIRECT. The experimental results show that such a multistage approach is a competitive and effective search method in the conformational search space of real proteins, in terms of solution quality and computational cost comparing the results of the current state-of-art algorithms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldi P, Pollastri G (2003) The principled design of large-scale recursive neural network architectures-DAG-RNNs and the protein structure prediction problem. Journal of Machine Learning Research 4:575–603
Bartholomew-Biggs MC, Parkhurst SC, Wilson SP (2002) Using DIRECT to solve an aircraft routing problem. Computational Optimization and Applications and International Journal 21(3):311–323
Bindewald E, Hesser J, Männer R (1998) Implementing genetic algorithms with sterical constrains for protein structure prediction. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN V), pp. 959–967, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Bowie JU, Eisemberg D (1994) An evolutionary approach to folding small alpha-helical proteins that uses sequence information and an empirical guiding fitness function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 4436–4440
Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M (1983) CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 4:187–217
Burnet FM (1959) The Clonal Selection Theory of Acquired Immunity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Byrd RH, Nocedal J, Schnabel RB (1994) Representation of quasi Newton matrices and their use in limited memory methods. Mathematical Programming 63(4):129–156
Carter RG, Gablonsky JM, Patrick A, Kelley CT (2001) Algorithms for noisy problems in gas transmission pipeline optimization. Optimization and Engineering 2:139–157
Cutello V, Nicosia G, Pavone M (2004) Exploring the capability of Immune Algorithms: A characterization of hypermutation operators. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems (ICARIS’04), vol. 3239, pp.␣263–276, Catania, Italy
Dennis JE, Schnabel RB (1983) Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Dunbrack RL Jr, Cohen FE (1997) Bayesian statistical analysis of protein sidechain rotamer preferences. Protein Science 6:1661–1681
Eisenberg D, Marcotte E, Xenarios I, Yeates TO (2000) Protein function in the post-genomic era. Nature 405(6788):823–826
Finkel DE (2003) DIRECT Optimization Algorithm User Guide. Technical Report, CRSC N.C. State University (ftp://ftp.ncsu.edu/pub/ncsu/crsc/pdf/crsc-tr03-11.pdf)
Foloppe N, MacKerell AD Jr (2000) All-atom empirical force field for nucleic acids: I. Parameter optimization based on small molecule and condensed phase macromolecular target data. Journal of Computational Chemistry 21:86–104
Gablonsky JM, Kelley CT (2001) A locally-biased form of the DIRECT Algorithm. Journal of Global Optimization 21:27–37
Hansmann UH, Okamoto Y (1997) Numerical comparisons of three recently proposed algorithms in the protein folding problem. Journal of Computational Chemistry 18: 920–933
Hong Zhu, Bogy DavidB. (2002). DIRECT Algorithm and its application to slider Air-Bearing surface optimization. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 38(5): 2168–2170
Huang CC, Couch GS, Pettersen EF, Ferrin TE (1996) Chimera: An extensible molecular modeling application constructed using standard components. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 1, 724
Huang SE, Samudrala R, Ponder JW (1999) Ab initio folding prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions. Journal of Molecular Biology 290: 267–281
Jones DR, Perttunen CD, Stuckman BE (1993). Lipschitzian optimization without the lipschitz constant. Journal of Optimization Theory and Application 79: 157–181
Kaiser CE Jr, Lamont GB, Merkle LD, Gates GH Jr, Patcher R (1997) Polypeptide structure prediction: Real-valued versus binary hybrid genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), pp. 279–286, San Jose, CA
Levitt M (1983) Protein folding by restrained energy minimization and molecular dynamics. Journal of Molecular Biology 170:723–764
Li Z, Scheraga HA (1998) Structure and free energy of complex thermodynamics systems. Journal of Molecular Structure 179:333–352
MacKerell AD Jr, Brooks B, Brooks C L III, Nilsson L, Roux B, Won Y, Karplus M (1998) CHARMM: The energy function and its parameterization with an overview of the program. In: Schleyer PvR et al. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, vol. 1, pp. 271–277. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
McLachlan AD (1982) Rapid comparison of protein structures. Acta cytologica A38: 871–873
Nicosia G (2004) Immune Algorithms for Optimization and Protein Structure Prediction. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science. University of Catania, Italy
Nicosia G, Cutello V, Bentley P, Timmis J (2004) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
Purisima EO, Scheraga HA (1987) An approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding by relaxing dimensionality. Test on enkephalin. Journal of Molecular Biology 196: 697–709
Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D (1997) Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and bayesian scoring function. Journal of Molecular Biology 306:1191–1199
Tramontano A (2006) Protein Structure Prediction: Concepts and Applications. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anile, A.M., Cutello, V., Narzisi, G. et al. Determination of protein structure and dynamics combining immune algorithms and pattern search methods. Nat Comput 6, 55–72 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-006-9027-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-006-9027-3