Abstract
A hybrid version between differential evolution and the fragment replacement technique was defined for protein structure prediction. The coarse-grained atomic model of the Rosetta system was used for protein representation. The high-dimensional and multimodal nature of protein energy landscapes requires an efficient search for obtaining the native structures with minimum energy. However, the energy model of Rosetta presents an additional difficulty, since the best energy area in the landscape does not necessarily correspond to the closest conformations to the native structure. A strategy is to obtain a diverse set of protein conformations that correspond to different minima in the landscape. The incorporation of the crowding niching method into the hybrid evolutionary algorithm allows addressing the problem of the energy landscape deceptiveness, allowing to obtain a set of optimized and diverse protein folds.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Anfinsen CB (1973) Principles that govern the folding of proteins. Science 181(96):223–230
De Jong KA (1975) An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems, Doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Dill KA (1990) Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemestry 29:7133–7155
Feoktistov V (2006) Differential evolution: in search of solutions. Springer, New York
Garza-Fabre M, Kandathil SM, Handl J, Knowles J, Lovell SC (2016) Generating, maintaining, and exploiting diversity in a memetic algorithm for protein structure prediction. Evol Comput 24(4):577–607
Jones D (1999) Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 292(2):195–202
Kandathil S.M, Garza-Fabre M, Handl J, Lovell SC (2018) Improved fragment-based protein structure prediction by redesign of search heuristics. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31891-8
Kmiecik S, Gront D, Kolinski M, Wieteska L, Dawid AE, Kolinski A (2016) Coarse-grained protein models and their applications. Chem Rev 116:7898–7936
Li X, Epitropakis MG, Deb K, Engelbrecht A (2017) Seeking multiple solutions: an updated survey on niching methods and their applications. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 21(4):518–538
Price KV, Storn RM, Lampinen JA (2005) Differential evolution. A practical approach to global optimization. Natural Computing Series. Springer, New York
Protein Data Bank (2003) http://www.wwpdb.org
Rohl CA, Strauss CEM, Misura KM, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383:66–93
Rosetta system (2020) http://www.rosettacommons.org
Saleh S, Olson B, Shehu A (2013) A population-based evolutionary search approach to the multiple minima problem in de novo protein structure prediction. BMC Struct Biol 13(1):S4
Santos J, Diéguez M (2011) Differential evolution for protein structure prediction using the HP model. Lect Notes Comput Sci 6686:323–323
Simoncini D, Schiex T, Zhang KYJ (2017) Balancing exploration and exploitation in population-based sampling improves fragment-based de novo protein structure prediction. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 85:852–858
Sippl MJ (1995) Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5(2):229–235
Thomsen R (2004) Multimodal optimization using crowding-based differential evolution. In: Proceedings IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, pp 1382–1389
Unger R (2004) The genetic algorithm approach to protein structure prediction. Struct Bond 110:153–175
Varela D, Santos J (2015) Combination of differential evolution and fragment-based replacements for protein structure prediction. In: GECCO 2015 proceedings companion, workshop evolutionary computation in computational structural biology, pp 911–914
Varela D, Santos J (2017) A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for protein structure prediction using the face-centered cubic lattice model. In: Proceedings international conference on neural information processing—ICONIP 2017, Lecture notes in computer science 10634, pp 628–638
Varela D, Santos J (2019) Crowding differential evolution for protein structure prediction. In: Proceedings international work-conference on the interplay between natural and artificial computation—IWINAC 2019, Lecture notes in computer science 11487, pp 193–203
Zaman AB, De Jong KA, Shehu A (2019) Using subpopulation EAs to map molecular structure landscapes. In: Proceedings GECCO 2019—conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, pp 960–967
Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 57(4):702–710
Zhao X (2008) Advances on protein folding simulations based on the lattice HP models with natural computing. Appl Soft Comput 8:1029–1040
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Xunta de Galicia (GPC ED431B 2019/03 and CITIC ED431G 2019/01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Varela, D., Santos, J. Protein structure prediction in an atomic model with differential evolution integrated with the crowding niching method. Nat Comput 21, 537–551 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-020-09801-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-020-09801-7