Skip to main content
Log in

Local Experts Organization Model for Natural Scene Images Classification

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, a novel Local Experts Organization (LEO) model for processing tree structures with its application of natural scene images classification is presented. Instead of relatively poor representation of image features in a flat vector form, we proposed to extract the features and encode them into a binary tree representation. The proposed LEO model is used to generalize this tree representation in order to perform the classification task. The capabilities of the proposed LEO model are evaluated in simulations running under different image scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that the LEO model is consistent in terms of robustness amongst the other tested classifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smeulders AWM (2000). Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 22(12): 1349–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jain A (1989). Fundamentals of digital image Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Comon P (1994). Independent component analysis, a new concept?. signal processing 36: 287–314

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Field D (1987). Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Amer A 4(12): 2379–2394

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tarr MJ and Bulthoff HH (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views—comment on biederman and gerhardstein (1993). J Experim Psychol Human Perception and Performance 21: 71–86

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tsoi AC (1998). Adaptive processing of data structure : an expository overview and comments. Faculty Informatics, Univ. Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Radha H, Vetterli M and Leonardi R (1996). Image compression using binary space partitioning trees. IEEE Trans on Image Process 5(2): 1610–1624

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Salembier P and Garrido L (2000). Binary partition tree as an efficient representation for image processing, segmentation and information retrieval. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(4): 561–576

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li J and Wang JZ (2003). Automatic linguistic indexing of pictures by a statistical modeling approach. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 25(9): 1075–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Forsyth DA and Fleck MM (1999). Automatic detection of human nudes. Int J Comput Vis 32(1): 63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matas J, Marik R, Kittler J (1995) On representation and matching of multi-colored objects. In: Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision, 726 pp

  12. Vladimir V (1982) Estimation of dependences based on empirical data. Springer-Verlag

  13. Cortes C and Vapnik VN (1995). Support vector networks. Mach Learn 20: 273–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Platt J (1998) Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In: Scholkopf B, Burges C, Smola A (eds) Advances in kernel methods—support vector learning. MIT Press, pp 185–208

  15. Osuna E, Freund R, Girosi F (1997) An improved training algorithm for support vector machines. In: Proc. of the 1997 IEEE workshop, neural network for signal processing, pp 276–285

  16. Toh Kar-A, Yau W-Y and Jiang X (2004). A reduced multivariate polynomials model for multi-modal biometrics and classifiers fusion. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 14(2): 224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Toh Kar-A, Tran Q-L and Srinivasan D (2004). Benchmarking a reduced multivariate polynomial patter classifier. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 26(6): 740–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin C-J, Weng RC (2004) Simple probabilistic predictions for Support Vector Regression, in Technical Report. Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University

  19. Wu T-F, Lin C-J and Weng RC (2004). Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. J Mach Learn Res 5: 975–1005

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Deng Y and Manjunath BS (2001). Unsupervised segmentation of color-texture regions in images and video. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 23(8): 800–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goller C, Kuchler A (1996) Learning task-dependent distributed representations by back-propagation through structures. In: IEEE Int Conf Neural Networks vol 1, pp 347–352

  22. Aha D and Kibler D (1991). Instance based learning algorithms. Machine Learning. Mach Learn 6: 37–66

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quinlan R (1993). C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Witten IH and Frank E (2005). Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siu-Yeung Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, JJ., Cho, SY. Local Experts Organization Model for Natural Scene Images Classification. Neural Process Lett 26, 83–99 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-007-9044-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-007-9044-y

Keywords

Navigation