Skip to main content
Log in

An Adaptive Extreme Learning Machine for Modeling NOx Emission of a 300 MW Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extreme learning machine (ELM) provides high learning speed, but generalization performance needs to be further improved. Therefore, we propose an adaptive ELM with a relaxation factor \(\lambda \) (A-ELM). In A-ELM, according to the nonlinear degree of actual data, the output layer obtains adaptively \(1-\lambda \) rate information through the hidden layer and \(\lambda \) rate information through the input layer. Since the relaxation factor \(\lambda \) is bound up with the input weights and hidden biases of A-ELM, in order to obtain the optimal \(\lambda \), \(\lambda \), input weights and hidden biases are obtained together by teaching–learning-based optimization (A-ELM-TLBO). Then, 15 benchmark regression data sets verify the performance of A-ELM-TLBO. Finally, A-ELM-TLBO is applied to set up the mapping relation between NOx emission and operational conditions of a 300 MW circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler. Compared with six other models, experimental results show that A-ELM-TLBO has good approximation ability and generalization performance. So, A-ELM-TLBO provides a good basis for tuning CFB boiler operating parameters to reduce NOx emission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou H, Cen K, Fan J (2004) Modeling and optimization of the NOx emission characteristics of a tangentially firedboiler with artificial neural networks. Energy 29:167–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Si F, Romero C, Yao Z et al (2009) Optimization of coalfired boiler SCRs based on modified support vector machine models and genetic algorithms. Fuel 88:806–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gu YP, Zhao WJ, Wu ZS (2011) Online adaptive least squares support vector machine and its application in utility boiler combustion optimization systems. J Process Control 21:1040–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou H, Zheng LG, Kf Cen (2010) Computational intelligence approach for NOx emissions minimization in a coal-fired utility boiler. Energ Convers Manag 51:580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ilamathi P, Selladurai V, Balamurugan K (2013) Modeling and optimization of unburned carbon in coal-fired boiler using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. J Energy Res Technol 135(3):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Suresh M, Reddy KS, Kolar AK (2011) ANN-GA based optimization of a high ash coal-fired supercritical power plant. Appl Energy 88:4867–4873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Song JG, Romero CE, Yao Z (2016) Improved artificial bee colony-based optimization of boiler combustion considering NOx emissions, heat rate and fly ash recycling for on-line applications. Fuel 172:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70(1):489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zong W, Huang GB (2011) Face recognition based on extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 74(16):2541–2551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cao J, Hao J, Lai X et al (2016) Ensemble extreme learning machine and sparse representation classification. J Frankl Inst 353(17):4526–4541

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Cao J, Zhang K, Luo M et al (2016) Extreme learning machine and adaptive sparse representation for image classification. Neural Netw 81:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang NY, Huang GB, Saratchandran P et al (2006) A fast and accurate on-line sequential learning algorithm for feedforward networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17(6):1411–14236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Wang Y, Yuan X (2012) Bidirectional extreme learning machine for regression problem and its learning effectiveness. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 23(9):1498–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang GB, Zhou H, Ding X et al (2012) Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 42(2):513–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang GB, Chen L (2007) Convex incremental extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 70(16):3056–3062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang GB, Chen L (2008) Enhanced random search based incremental extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 71(16):3460–3468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lan Y, Soh YC, Huang GB (2009) Ensemble of online sequential extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 72(13):3391–3395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao J, Lin Z, Huang GB (2012) Self-adaptive evolutionary extreme learning machine. Neural Process Lett 36(3):285–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Han F, Yao HF, Ling QH (2013) An improved evolutionary extreme learning machine based on particle swarm optimization. Neurocomputing 116:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan YT, Wu W, Yang WY et al (2014) A pruning algorithm with \(L_{1/2}\) regularizer for extreme learning machine. J Zhejiang Univ Sci C 15(2):119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. He MY (1994) Double parallel feedforward neural network with application to simulation study of flight fault inspection. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 15(7):877–881

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li GQ, Niu PF, Duan XL (2014) Fast learning network: a novel artificial neural network with a fast learning speed. Neural Comput Appl 24(7–8):1683–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rao RV, Savsani VJ, Vakharia DP (2011) Teaching–learning-based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Comput Aided Des 43(3):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rao RV, Savsani VJ, Vakharia DP (2012) Teaching–learning-based optimization: an optimization method for continuous non-linear large scale problems. Inf Sci 183(1):1–15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Amiri B (2012) Application of teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm on cluster analysis. J Basic Appl Sci Res 2(3):11795–11802

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rao RV, Kalyankar VD (2013) Parameter optimization of modern machining processes using teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(1):524–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rao RV (2015) Teaching learning based optimization and its engineering applications. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rao RV (2016) Review of applications of TLBO algorithm and a tutorial for beginners to solve the unconstrained and constrained optimization problems. Decis Sci Lett 5(1):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  29. Singh M, Panigrahi BK, Abhyankar AR (2013) Optimal coordination of directional over-current relays using teaching learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 50:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lichman M (2013) UCI machine learning repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  31. Ross DK, Jonathan DH, Michael JES (1995) Comparison of artificial intelligence methods for modeling pharmaceutical qsars. Appl Artif Intell 9(2):213–233

  32. Torgo L Regression datasets. http://www.dcc.fc.up.pt/ltorgo/Regression/DataSets.html

  33. Coraddu A, Oneto L, Ghio A et al (2016) Machine learning approaches for improving condition-based maintenance of naval propulsion plants. In: Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers part M journal of engineering for the maritime environment, pp 56–63

  34. Tüfekci P (2014) Prediction of full load electrical power output of a base load operated combined cycle power plant using machine learning methods. Int J Elec Power 60(11):126–140

  35. Yeh IC (1998) Modeling of strength of high-performance concrete using artificial neural net works. Cement Concrete Res 28(12):1797–1808

  36. Gandhi AH, Alack AH (2012) Krill herd: a new bio-inspired optimization algorithm. Commun Nonlinear SCI 17(12):4831–4845

  37. Li GQ, Niu PF (2013) An enhanced extreme learning machine based on ridge regression for regression. Neural Comp Appl 22(3–4):803–810

  38. Zhu QY, Qin AK, Suganthan PN et al (2005) Evolutionary extreme learning machine. Pattern Recogn 38(10):1759–1763

  39. Zhao G, Shen Z, Man Z (2011) Robust input weight selection for well-conditioned extreme learning machine. Int J Inform Technol 17(1):1–13

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful and constructive comments and suggestions. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (No. 61573306 and No. 61403331), the Teaching Research Project of Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology (No. JYZD201413) and the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology, Yanshan University (No. 201702).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peifeng Niu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Niu, P., Li, G. et al. An Adaptive Extreme Learning Machine for Modeling NOx Emission of a 300 MW Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler. Neural Process Lett 46, 643–662 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-017-9611-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-017-9611-9

Keywords

Navigation