Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

An Artificial Neural Network for Solving Distributed Optimal Control of the Poisson’s Equation

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a simple and efficient method based on artificial neural network to solve distributed optimal control of Poisson’s equation with Dirichlet boundary condition. The trial solutions are used to approximate the state and control variables. These trial solutions are considered by using a single layer neural network. By replacing the trial solutions in objective function and Poisson’s equation, then using the weighted residual method, distributed optimal control of Poisson’s equation is converted to a linear quadratic optimal control problem. The weights of the trial solutions are computed by solving the new problem. In order to solve the linear quadratic optimal control problem, the Pontryagin maximum principle is used. Finally we apply the proposed method on several examples that in computational experiments, the high efficiency of the presented method is illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Aarts LP, Van Der Veer P (2001) Neural network method fors olving partial differential equations. Neural Process Lett 14:261–271

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alli H, Ucar A, Demir Y (2003) The solutions of vibration control problems using artificial neural networks. J Frankl Inst 340(307):325

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Altrogge I, Preusser T, Kröger T, Büskens C, Pereiran PL, Schmidt D (2007) Multiscale optimization of the probe-placement for radio-frequency ablation. Acad Radiol 14:1310–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Apel T, Flaig TG (2009) Simulation and mathematical optimization of the hydration of concrete for avoiding thermal cracks. In: 18th International conference on the application of computer science and mathematics in architecture and civil engineering

  5. Chen CT (1995) Linear system theory and design. Oxford University Press Inc, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng T, Lewis FL, Abu-Khalaf M (2007) A neural network solution for fixed-final time optimal control of nonlinear systems. Automatica 43:482–490

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cybenko G (1989) Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signals Syst (MCSS) 2:303–314

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dissanayake MW, Phan- Thien N (1994) Neural network based approximations for solving partial differential equations. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 10:195–201

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Effati S, Pakdaman M (2013) Optimal control problem via neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 23:2093–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finlayson BA (1972) The method of weighted residuals and variational principles. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Golub GH, Welsch JW (1969) Calculation of gauss quadrature rules. Math Comput 23:221–230

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinze M, Pinnau R, Ulbrich M, Ulbrich S (2009) Optimization with PDE constraints. Springer

  13. Kamyad AV, Skandari MHN, Erfanian HR (2011) A new definition for generalized first derivative of nonsmooth functions. Appl Math 2:1252–1257

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kierzenka J (1998) Studies in the numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Ph.D. Thesis, Southern Methodist University

  15. Lagaris IE, Likas A, Fotiadis D (1998) Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9:987–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lions JL (1968) Optimal control of systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Naidu DS (2002) Optimal control systems. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pearson JW, Wathen AJ (2012) A new approximation of the Schur complement in preconditioners for PDE-constrained optimization. Numer Linear Algebra Appl 19:816–829

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pearson JW (2013) A radial basis function method for solving PDE-constrained optimization problems. Numer Algorithms 64:481–506

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Rees T, Dollar HS, Wathen AJ (2010) Optimal solvers for PDE-constrained optimization. SIAM J Sci Comput 32:271–298

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Rudin W (1991) Functional analysis. International series in pure and applied mathematics. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rudd K, Ferrari S (2015) A constrained integration (CINT) approach to solving partial differential equations using artificial neural networks. Neurocomputing 155:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sandberg EW (1998) Notes on uniform approximation of time-varying systems on finite time intervals. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Fundam Theory Appl 45:863–865

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Shampine L, Kierzenka J, Reichelt M (2011) Solving boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations in Matlab with bvp4c, 2000. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/3819. Taken on June 6, pp 1–30

  25. Tröltzsch F (2010) Optimal control of partial differential equations. Graduate studies in mathematics, vol 42. American Mathematical Society

  26. Wang X, Shimizu K (2001) Approximate solution of Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equation by using neural networks and matrix calculus techniques. IEICE Trans Fundam Electron Commun Comput Sci 84(6):1549–1556

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yanping C, Yi N, Liu W (2008) A Legendre–Galerkin spectral method for optimal control problems governed by elliptic equations. SIAM J Numer Anal 46:2254–2275

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Yanping C, Xia N, Yi N (2011) A Legendre Galerkin spectral method for optimal control problems. J Syst Sci Complex 24:663–671

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Mathematics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Shojaeddin Ghasemi & Sohrab Effati

  2. Center of Excellence of Soft Computing and Intelligent Information Processing (SCIIP), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Sohrab Effati

Authors
  1. Shojaeddin Ghasemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sohrab Effati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohrab Effati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, S., Effati, S. An Artificial Neural Network for Solving Distributed Optimal Control of the Poisson’s Equation. Neural Process Lett 49, 159–175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-018-9806-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-018-9806-8

Keywords