Skip to main content
Log in

Compressive Sensing of Multichannel EEG Signals Based on Graph Fourier Transform and Cosparsity

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cosparsity as a useful prior has been extensively applied in accurate compressive sensing (CS) recovery of multichannel electroencephalogram (EEG) signals from only a few measurements. Latest studies proved that exploiting cosparsity and channel correlation in a unified framework can obtain accurate recovery results. However, all these methods ignore the adjacent relationship between the real physical electrodes and exploit the inaccurate channel correlation. Another problem is that most methods employ convex regularizations to exploit cosparsity and channel correlation, which cannot obtain competitive results. In this paper, a novel graph Fourier transform and nonconvex optimization (GFTN)-based method is proposed to enforce inherent correlation across different channels and cosparsity. Alternative direction method of multipliers is used to solve the resulting nonconvex optimization problem. Experiments show that GFTN can remarkably improve the performance of CS recovery for multichannel EEG signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Abdulghani AM, Casson AJ, Rodriguez-Villegas E (2012) Compressive sensing scalp EEG signals: implementations and practical performance. Med Biol Eng Comput 50(11):1137–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J (2011) Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found Trends Mach Learn 3(1):1–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cand EJ, Wakin MB (2008) An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process Mag 25(2):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Casson AJ, Yates D, Smith S, Duncan JS, Rodriguez-Villegas E (2010) Wearable electroencephalography. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 29(3):44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chartrand R, Yin W (2008) Iteratively reweighted algorithms for compressive sensing. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech & signal processing, pp 3869–3872

  6. Dong W, Shi G, Li X, Ma Y, Huang F (2014) Compressive sensing via nonlocal low-rank regularization. IEEE Trans Image Process Publ IEEE Signal Process Soc 23(8):3618–3632

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Donoho DL (2006) Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(4):1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng L, Sun H, Sun Q, Xia G (2016) Image compressive sensing via truncated schatten-p norm regularization. Signal Process Image Commun 47:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Higashi H, Tanaka T, Tanaka Y (2015) Smoothing of spatial filter by graph Fourier transform for eeg signals. In: Asia-Pacific signal and information processing association, 2014 summit and conference

  10. Hooda A, Sharma S (2013) Wireless body area network. In: Proceedings of international symposium on medical information & communication technology, vol 3, no 3, pp 203–210

  11. Hosseini Kamal M, Shoaran M, Leblebici Y, Schmid A (2013) Compressive multichannel cortical signal recording. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech & signal processing, pp 4305–4309

  12. Liu Y, De VM, Van HS (2015) Compressed sensing of multichannel EEG signals: the simultaneous cosparsity and low-rank optimization. IEEE Trans Bio-med Eng 62(8):2055–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Majumdar A, Ward RK (2015) Energy efficient EEG sensing and transmission for wireless body area networks: a blind compressed sensing approach. Biomed Signal Process Control 20:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malmivuo J, Plonsey R (1995) Bioelectromagnetism: principles and applications of bioelectric and biomagnetic fields. Part 1. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Nam S, Davies ME, Elad M, Gribonval R (2011) The cosparse analysis model and algorithms. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 34(1):30–56

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Qi F, Li Y, Wu W (2017) RSTFC: a novel algorithm for spatio-temporal filtering and classification of single-trial EEG. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 26(12):3070–3082

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Rao BD, Kreutz-Delgado K (1999) An affine scaling methodology for best basis selection. IEEE Trans Signal Process 47(1):187–200

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Shu X, Yang J, Ahuja N (2014) Non-local compressive sampling recovery. In: International conference on computational photography, pp 1–8

  19. Wang J, Wang M, Hu X, Yan S (2015) Visual data denoising with a unified schatten-p norm and q norm regularized principle component pursuit. Pattern Recognit 48(10):3135–3144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wormann J, Hawe S, Kleinsteuber M (2013) Analysis based blind compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Process Lett 20(5):491–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu W, Chen Z, Gao X, Li Y, Brown EN, Gao S (2015) Probabilistic common spatial patterns for multichannel EEG analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 37(3):639–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu W, Nagarajan S, Chen Z (2016) Bayesian machine learning: EEG/MEG signal processing measurements. IEEE Signal Process Mag 33(1):14–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xie Y (2015) Weighted schatten $p$-norm minimization for image denoising with local and nonlocal regularization. Eprint Arxiv

  24. Zhang Z, Jung TP, Makeig S, Rao BD (2013) Compressed sensing of EEG for wireless telemonitoring with low energy consumption and inexpensive hardware. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(1):221–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the anonymous referees as well as the Editor and Associate Editor for their valuable comments, which led to substantial improvements of the paper. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61772272 and 61801199), the Natural Science Fund Project of Colleges in Jiangsu Province (No. 18KJB520017) and the High-level Talent Scientific Research Foundation of Jinling Institute of Technology (No. jit-b-201801).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaijiang Sun.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, X., Feng, L. & Sun, H. Compressive Sensing of Multichannel EEG Signals Based on Graph Fourier Transform and Cosparsity. Neural Process Lett 51, 1227–1236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-10150-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-10150-5

Keywords