Skip to main content
Log in

An Improved U-Net for Human Sperm Head Segmentation

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sperm morphology analysis is an important step in the clinical diagnosis of male infertility, which means that the shape of sperm head is an important indicator in sperm morphology analysis. Therefore the accurate and efficient segmentation of human sperm head is essential for accurate and objective analysis of sperm morphology. In this paper, we have proposed an efficient deep learning algorithm for fully automatic segmentation of human sperm head based on the U-Net network structure. First of all, we performed sperm cell image collection and built a new dataset that is suitable for segmentation of human sperm heads in deep learning algorithms. Our dataset consists of 1207 sperm cell images from more than 20 male infertility patients. Then we improved the U-Net architecture by integrating the dilated convolution into it and replaced the long skip layer in the original network with the block we designed, which finally formed our final deep convolutional neural network. We use our dataset to train our proposed network so that we can segment the sperm head. Our algorithm is one of the few methods for segmentation of sperm head using deep learning algorithms. And compared with previous methods, our model not only achieve good results in unstained and low-resolution images containing only individual sperm cells, but also shows excellent performance in complex images containing multiple sperm cells. Our experimental results have confirmed that the HDC (Hybrid Dilated Convolution) module and our designed Block have a noticeable improvement on segmentation results. Meanwhile, we have achieved a high Dice coefficient of 95.14\(\%\). The segmentation results we tested on the prostate dataset prove that our model has good generalization ability and robustness. It is worth noting that our algorithm processed the images showing the original true morphology of the sperm cells and achieved high segmentation accuracy. It’s is very important for doctors to diagnose whether the sperm morphology is abnormal in the clinic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Isidori A, Latini M, Romanelli F (2005) Treatment of male infertility. Contraception 72:314–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG (2007) International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking:potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 22:1506–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt L (2010) Psychosocial consequences of infertility and treatment. In: Carrell DT, Peterson CM (eds) Reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Springer, New York, pp 93–100

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Peronace LA, Boivin J, Schmidt L (2007) Patterns of suffering and social interactions in infertile men: 12 months after unsuccessful treatment. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 28:105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiersema N, Drukker A, Dung M, Nhu G, Nhu N, Lambalk C (2006) Consequences of infertility in developing countries: results of a questionnaire and interview survey in the South of Vietnam. J Transl Med 4:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Onat G, Beji NK (2012) Marital relationship and quality of life among couples with infertility. Sex Disabil 30:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maduro MR, Lamb DJ (2002) Understanding new genetics of male infertility. J Urol 168:2197–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barroso G, Mercan R, Ozgur K, Morshedi M, Kolm P, Coetzee K, Kruger T, Oehninger S (1999) in: Intra- and inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of sperm morphology by strict criteria: impact of semen preparation staining techniques and manual versus computerized analysis. Hum Reprod 14(8):2036–2040

  9. Franken DR (2014) How accurate is sperm morphology as an indicator of sperm function? Andrologia 47:720–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz D, Overstreet J, Samuels S, Niswander P, Bloom T, Lewis E (1986) Morphometric analysis of spermatozoa in the assessment of human male fertility. J Androl 7(4):203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization, WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, fifth ed. (2010)

  12. García-Olalla O, Alegre E, Fernández-Robles L, Malm P, Bengtsson E (2015) Acrosome integrity assessment of boar spermatozoa images using an early fusion of texture and contour descriptors. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 120:49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freund C (1966) Standards for the rating of human sperm morphology. A cooperative study. Int J Fertil 11(1):97–180

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brazil C (2010) Practical semen analysis: from A to Z. Asian J Androl 12:14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Auger J, Eustache F, Ducot B, Blandin T, Daudin M, Diaz I, Matribi S, Gony B, Keskes L, Kolbezen M, Lamarte A, Lornage J, Nomal N, Pitaval G, Simon O, Virant-Klun I, Spira A, Jouannet P (2000) Intra- and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentration, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories. Hum Reprod 15(11):2360–2368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soler C, de Monserrat J, Gutiérrez R, Nunez J, Nunez M, Sancho M, Pérez-Sánchez F, Cooper T (2003) Use of the sperm-class analyser for objective assessment of human sperm morphology. Int J Androl 26(5):262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cipak A, Stanic P, Duric K, Serdar T, Suchanek E (2009) Sperm morphology assessment according to who and strict criteria: method comparison and intra-laboratory variability. Biochem Med 19(1):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bijar A, Benavent AP, Mikaeili M et al (2012) Fully automatic identification and discrimination of sperm’s parts in microscopic images of stained human semen smear. J Biomed Sci Eng 5:384

  19. Sánchez L, Petkov N, Alegre E (2006) Statistical approach to boar semen evaluation using intracellular intensity distribution of head images. Cell Mol Biol 52:38–43

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nissen MS, Krause O, Almstrup K, Kjærulff S, Nielsen TT, Nielsen M (2017) Convolutional neural networks for segmentation and object detection of human semen. In: Scandinavian conference on image analysis. Springer, pp 397–406

  21. Soroush Javadi, Mirroshandel SA (2019) A novel deep learning method for automatic assessment of human sperm images. Comput Biol Med 109:182–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aitken RJ (2010) Whither must spermatozoa wander? The future of laboratory seminology. Asian J Androl 12(1):99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention

  24. Schmassmann A, Mikuz G, Bartsch B, Rohr H (1982) Spermiometrics: objective and reproducible methods for evaluating sperm morphology. Eur Urol 8(5):274–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jagoe J, Washbrook N, Hudson E (1986) Morphometry of spermatozoa using semiautomatic image analysis. J. Clin. Pathol. 39(12):1347–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moruzzi J, Wyrobek A, Mayall B, Gledhill B (1988) Quantification and classification of human sperm morphology by computer-assisted image analysis. Fertil Steril 50(1):142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pérez-Sánchez F, de Monserrat J, Soler C (1994) Morphometric analysis of human sperm morphology. Int J Androl 17(5):248–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. González-Castro V, Alegre E, Morala-Argüello P, Suárez S (2009) A combined and intelligent new segmentation method for boar semen based on thresholding and watershed transform. Int J Imaging 2(S09):70–80

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sánchez L, Petkov N (2009) Estimation of boar sperm status using intracellular density distribution in grey level images. Similarity-Based Clustering, Springer, pp 169–184

  30. Alegre E, González-Castro V, Alaiz-Rodríguez R, García-Ordás M (2012) Texture and moments-based classification of the acrosome integrity of boar spermatozoa images. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 108(2):873–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Park K, Yi W, Paick J (1997) Segmentation of sperms using the strategic Hough transform. Ann Biomed Eng 25:294–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nafisi V, Moradi M, Nasr-Esfahani M (2005) Sperm identification using elliptic model and tail detection. Trans Eng Comput Technol 7(1):419–421

    Google Scholar 

  33. Carrillo H, Villarreal J, Sotaquira M, Goelkel M, Gutiérrez R (2007) A computer aided tool for the assessment of human sperm morphology. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and bioengineering (BIBE 2007), pp 1152–1157

  34. Chang V, Saavedra JM, Castañeda V, Sarabia L, Hitschfeld N, Härtel S (2014) Gold-standard and improved framework for sperm head segmentation. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 117:225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ghasemian F, Mirroshandel SA, Monji-Azad S, Azarnia M, Zahiri Z (2015) An efficient method for automatic morphological abnormality detection from human sperm images. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 122:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaker F, Monadjemi SA, Alirezaie J, Naghsh-Nilchi AR (2017) A dictionary learning approach for human sperm heads classification. Comput Biol Med 91:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ilhan HO, Serbes G, Aydin N (2019) Automatic directional masking technique for better sperm morphology segmentation and classification analysis. Electron Lett 55(5):256–258

  38. Kheirkhah FM, Mohammadi HRS, Shahverdi A (2019) Efficient and robust segmentation and tracking of sperm cells in microscopic image sequences. IET Comput Vis 13(5):489–499

  39. Akbari Movahed Reza, Mahdi Orooji et al (2018) A learning-based framework for the automatic segmentation of human sperm head. Acrosome and Nucleus, ICBME

    Google Scholar 

  40. Movahed RA, Mohammadi E, Orooji M (2019) Automatic segmentation of Sperm’s parts in microscopic images of human semen smears using concatenated learning approaches. Comput Biol Med 109:242–253

  41. Yu F, Koltun V (2016) Multi-scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions. ICLR, May, San Juan, Puerto Rico

  42. Chen L-C, Papandreou G, Schroff F, Adam H (2017) Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv:1706.05587 [cs.CV]

  43. Wang P, Chen P, Yuan Y, et al (2018) Understanding convolution for semantic segmentation. In: 2018 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV). IEEE

  44. Kingma D, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980 [cs.LG]

  45. Litjens G, Toth R, van de Ven W et al (2014) Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: the PROMISE12 challenge. Med Image Anal 18:359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 61371156, and Anhui Province Key Scientific and Technological Research Programs Grant No. 201904d07020018. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviews for their helpful and constructive comments and suggestions regarding this manuscript. And all of our authors sincerely thank the physicians and staffs of the Reproductive Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China for providing valuable sperm data, and conducting and assisting us in completing the data annotation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu Zhan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, Q., Yuan, X., Qian, J. et al. An Improved U-Net for Human Sperm Head Segmentation. Neural Process Lett 54, 537–557 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10643-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10643-2

Keywords

Navigation