Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Novel Hybrid CNN-LSTM Compensation Model Against DoS Attacks in Power System State Estimation

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Denial of Service (DoS) attack blocks the transmission of the power system measurements by the interference, which greatly degrades the performance of power system state estimation performance. In order to reduce the impact of DoS attacks on estimated performance, it is necessary to compensate for lost measurements. In this paper, a hybrid compensation model based on deep neural networks is proposed for power system state estimation under DoS attacks. In this compensation model, the advantages of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long-Short Term Memory Neural Networks (LSTM) are respectively utilized in the automatic feature extraction and long-term prediction of measurements. The spatio features of the measurements are fully figured out by squeeze-and-excitation blocks in the CNN, which enables the characteristic response of the input channel can be adaptively adjusted. Moreover, an autoregressive is applied for dealing with the problem of the scale insensitivity of neural network models. The proposed model is validated in a Cubature Kalman Filtering (CKF) state estimation algorithm on the IEEE-30 and IEEE-118 bus test systems. Simulation results illustrate that the CKF algorithm with the proposed model withstands the DoS attacks and performs a higher estimation accuracy than that with the LSTM, CNN, and the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gunasekaran N, Ali MS, Pavithra S (2019) Finite-time L\(\infty \) performance state estimation of recurrent neural networks with sampled-data signals. Neural Process Lett 51:1379–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali MS (2018) Sampled-data state estimation of Markovian jump static neural networks with interval time-varying delays. J Comput Appl Math 343:217–229

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali MS, Gunasekaran N, Joo YH (2018) Sampled-data state estimation of neutral type neural networks with mixed time-varying delays[J]. Neural Process Lett 50:357–378

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ali MS, Gunasekaran N, Zhu Q (2017) State estimation of T-S fuzzy delayed neural networks with Markovian jumping parameters using sampled-data control. Fuzzy Sets Syst 306:87–104

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Teixeira A, Amin S, Sandberg H, Johansson KH, Sastry SS (2010) Cyber security analysis of state estimators in electric power systems. In: 49th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), pp 5991–5998

  6. Chen J, Dou C, Xiao L, Wang Z (2019) Fusion state estimation for power systems under dos attacks: a switched system approach. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern Syst 49:1679–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liang G, Zhao J, Luo F, Weller SR, Dong ZY (2017) A review of false data injection attacks against modern power systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 8:1630–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chao Y, Wen Y, Shi H (2018) Dos attack in centralised sensor network against state estimation. IET Control Theory Appl 12:1244–1253

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Du L, Lewis FL (2020) Stochastic dos attack allocation against collaborative estimation in sensor networks. IEEE/CAA J Automatica Sinica 7:1225–1234

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou Y, Miao Z (2016) Cyber attacks, detection and protection in smart grid state estimation. In: north American power symposium, pp 1–6

  11. Chen W, Ding D, Dong H, Wei G (2019) Distributed resilient filtering for power systems subject to denial-of-service attacks. IEEE Trans Syst, Man Cybern: Syst 49:1688–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luca SCHENATO (2009) To zero or to hold control inputs with lossy links? IEEE Trans Autom Control 54:1093–1099

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun S (2013) Optimal linear filters for discrete-time systems with randomly delayed and lost measurements with/without time stamps. IEEE Trans Autom Control 58:1551–1556

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang H, Li H, Xia Y, Li L (2018) Nonuniform sampling kalman filter for networked systems with markovian packets dropout. J Franklin Inst 355:4218–4240

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu X, Li H (2020) An improved stability theorem for nonlinear systems on time scales with application to multi-agent systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs 67:3277–3281

    Google Scholar 

  16. X Lu, H Li. (2020) A hybrid control approach to H\(\infty \) problem of nonlinear descriptor systems with actuator saturation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

  17. Broersen Mt P (2009) Modified durbin method for accurate estimation of moving-average models. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 58:1361–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Z, Lou Y (2019) Hydrological time series forecast model based on wavelet de-noising and arima-lstm. In: 2019 IEEE 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), pp 1697–1701

  19. Nezhad SMT, Nazari M, Gharavol E (2016) A novel dos and ddos attacks detection algorithm using arima time series model and chaotic system in computer networks. IEEE Commun Lett 20:700–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Demidova L, Ivkina M (2020) Development and research of the forecasting models based on the time series using the random forest algorithm. 2020 2nd International Conference on Control Systems. Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA), pp 359–364

  21. Jwa B, Xin SA, Qian CA, Quan CA (2020) An innovative random forest-based nonlinear ensemble paradigm of improved feature extraction and deep learning for carbon price forecasting. Sci Total Environ 762:143099

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao X, Nie X (2020) Prediction error and forecasting interval analysis of decision trees with an application in renewable energy supply forecasting. Complexity, 2020

  23. Lim B, Zohren S (2021) Time-series forecasting with deep learning: a survey. Philos Trans Royal Soci Math Phys Eng Sci 379:20200209

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiao Z, Hu P, Xu H, Wang Q (2020) Machine learning and deep learning in chemical health and safety: a systematic review of techniques and applications. J Chem Health Saf 27:316–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ploysuwan T(2019) Deep cnn and lstm network for appliances energy forecasting in residential houses using iot sensors. In: 2019 7th international electrical engineering congress (iEECON), pp 1-4

  26. Wang Y, Wang Z, Wang H, Junfeng Z, Feng R (2019) Prediction of passenger flow based on cnn-lstm hybrid model. In: 2019 12th international symposium on computational intelligence and design (ISCID) 2:132-135

  27. Cirstea RG, Micu DV, Muresan GM, Guo C, Yang B (2018) Correlated time series forecasting using Deep neural networks: a summary of results arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.09794

  28. Bao T, Zaidi S, Xie S, Yang P, Zhang ZQ (2020) A cnn-lstm hybrid model for wrist kinematics estimation using surface electromyography. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bishop CM (1995) Regularization and complexity control in feed-forward networks. In proceedings international conference on artificial neural networks 1:141–148

  30. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning MIT press

  31. Zhang R, Yin J, Peng F (2019) Situational awareness for dynamic power system based on UKF-driven residual matrix analysis. In: 2019 IEEE innovative smart grid technologies-Asia, pp 964-969

  32. Qi J, Kai S, Wang J (2018) Dynamic state estimation for multi-machine power system by unscented kalman filter with enhanced numerical stability. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9:1184–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rouhani A, Abur A (2015) Real-time dynamic parameter estimation for an exponential dynamic load model. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7:1530–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun J, Li P, Wang C (2021) Optimise transient control against DoS attacks on ESS by input convex neural networks in a game. Sustain Energy, Grids Netw 28:100535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao H, Tian T (2014) Dynamic state estimation for power system based on an adaptive unscented kalman filter. Power Syst Technol 38:188–192

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bhattacharya S, BasAr T (2010) Game-theoretic analysis of an aerial jamming attack on a uav communication network. In: proceedings of the 2010 American control conference, pp 818-823

  37. Ding K, Ren X, Quevedo DE, Subhrakanti D, Shi L (2018) Dos attacks on remote state estimation with asymmetric information. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 6:653–666

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9:1735–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jie H, Li S, Gang S (2018) Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 7132-7141

  40. Lai G, Chang WC, Yang Y, Liu H (2018) Modeling long- and short-term temporal patterns with deep neural networks. In: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in information retrieval, pp 95-104

  41. Karim F, Majumdar S, Darabi H, Harford S (2018) Multivariate lstm-fcns for time series classification. Neural Netw 116:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Arasaratnam I, Haykin S (2009) Cubature kalman filters. IEEE Trans Autom Control 54:1254–1269

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1990) Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw 3:551–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bergmeir C, Benítez J (2012) On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation. Inf Sci 191:192–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal Mach Learn Res 15:1929–1958

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Karim F, Majumdar S, Darabi H (2019) Multivariate LSTM-FCNs for time series classification. Neural Netw 116:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is jointly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61703347; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant XDJK2020B010); Chongqing special fund for technological innovation and application development (Grant cstc2019jscx-fxydX0017); Natural science foundation of chongqing, grant no. stc2021jcyj-msxmX0416.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Southwest University, Beibei District, 400715, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoxin Xu, Jian Sun, Chunye Wang & Bin Zou

Authors
  1. Xiaoxin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chunye Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bin Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Sun.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X., Sun, J., Wang, C. et al. A Novel Hybrid CNN-LSTM Compensation Model Against DoS Attacks in Power System State Estimation. Neural Process Lett 54, 1597–1621 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10696-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10696-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation