Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

PReLCaP : Precedence Retrieval from Legal Documents Using Catch Phrases

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precedence retrieval is the process of retrieving similar prior case documents for the given current case document in the legal domain. Referencing the prior cases is important to ensure that an identical situation is treated similarly in all the cases. Concise representation of case documents using catch phrases facilitates the practitioners to avoid spending more time on reading the whole documents for finding the prior cases. The existing approaches for precedent retrieval in the legal domain use either statistical or semantic similarity features to find the prior cases. However, the substruction similarity features that consider the context of the statement helps to correctly identify the prior cases. Further, the existing approaches consider the whole document while extracting the similarity features, which is time-consuming. In this paper, we propose to use a combination of statistical, semantic, and substruction similarity features that are extracted from the catch phrases of the legal documents. The catch phrases from legal documents are extracted by utilizing Sequence-to-Sequence deep neural network with stacked encoder-decoder and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) as the recurrent unit. The substruction similarity features are obtained using a convolutional neural network. The IRLeD@FIRE-2017 dataset is used for evaluating our approach. The experimental results show that considering catch phrases reduces the retrieval time without reducing the retrieval performance. The k-paired t-test also shows that the improvement in performance of the model by using substruction similarity features that are extracted from the catch phrases is statistically significant when compared with other models. The PReLCaP outperforms state-of-the-art approaches with the MAP score of 0.632 on test data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/map/TheImportanceofPrecedent.html.

  2. https://github.com/Kayal-Sampath/Precedence-Retrieval.

References

  1. Akkalyoncu Yilmaz Z, Wang S, Yang W, Zhang H, Lin J (2019) “Applying BERT to Document Retrieval with Birc”. In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP): system demonstrations, association for computational linguistics, Hong Kong, China, pp 19–24., https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-3004

  2. Allard T, Béziaud L, Gambs S (2020) “Online publication of court records: circumventing the privacy-transparency trade-off. eprint2007.01688

  3. Almuslim I, Inkpen D (2020) Document level embeddings for identifying similar legal cases and laws (aila 2020 shared task). Proceedings of FIRE pp 42–48

  4. Aroraa J, Patankara T, Shaha A, Joshia S (2020) Artificial intelligence as legal research assistant. FIRE (Working Notes) pp 60–65

  5. Balaji NNA, Bharathi B, Bhuvana J (2020) Legal information retrieval and rhetorical role labelling for legal judgements. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 26–30

  6. Barathi Ganesh H, Reshma U, Anand Kumar M, Soman K (2017) “Distributed representation in information retrieval - Amrita_cen_nlp@irled 2017”. FIRE (CEUR Vol-2036) pp 69–71

  7. Bhattacharya P, Ghosh K, Ghosh S, Pal A, Mehta P, Bhattacharya A, Majumder P (2019) “Overview of the FIRE 2019 AILA track: artificial intelligence for legal assistance”. In: FIRE (CEUR Vol-2517), pp 1–12

  8. Caserta S (2020) Digitalization of the legal field and the future of large law firms. Laws 9(2):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Devyatkin D, Sofronova A, Yadrintsev V (2020) Revealing implicit relations in Russian legal texts. In: Kuznetsov SO, Panov AI, Yakovlev KS (eds) Artificial intelligence. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 228–239

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Nunzioa GM (2020) A study on lemma vs stem for legal information retrieval using r tidyverse. ims unipd@ aila 2020 task pp 54–59

  11. Eto M (2019) Extended co-citation search: Graph-based document retrieval on a co-citation network containing citation context information. Inf Process Manag 56(6):102046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fink T, Recski G, Hanbury A (2020) Fire2020 aila track: legal domain search with minimal domain knowledge. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 76–81

  13. Gain B, Bandyopadhyay D, De A, Saikh T, Ekbal A (2021) Iitp at aila 2019: System report for artificial intelligence for legal assistance shared task. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.11347

  14. Gao J, Ning H, Sun H, Liu R, Han Z, Kong L, Qi H (2019) Fire2019@ aila: Legal retrieval based on information retrieval model. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 64–69

  15. Hao S, Shi C, Niu Z, Cao L (2018) Concept coupling learning for improving concept lattice-based document retrieval. Eng Appl Artif Intell 69:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofst atter S, Zamani H, Mitra B, Craswell N, Hanbury A (2020) Local self-attention over long text for efficient document retrieval, Association for computing machinery, New York, NY, USA, p 2021-2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397271.3401224

  17. Kayalvizhi S, Thenmozhi D (2020) Deep learning approach for extracting catch phrases from legal documents. In: Neural networks for natural language processing, IGI Global, pp 143–158

  18. Kayalvizhi S, Thenmozhi D, Aravindan C (2019) Legal assistance using word embeddings. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 36–39

  19. Kayalvizhi S, Thenmozhi D, Aravindan C (2020) Best matching algorithm to identify and rank the relevant statutes. In: Proceedings of FIRE pp 31–34

  20. Kulkarni YH, Patil R, Shridharan S (2017) Detection of catchphrases and precedence in legal documents. In: FIRE (CEUR Vol-2036), pp 86–89

  21. Kuzi S, Zhang M, Li C, Bendersky M, Najork M (2020) Leveraging semantic and lexical matching to improve the recall of document retrieval systems: a hybrid approach

  22. Leburu-Dingalo T, Motlogelwa NP, Thuma E, Modongo M (2020) Ub at fire 2020 precedent and statute retrieval. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 12–17

  23. Lefoane M, Koboyatshwene T, Narasimhan L (2018) KNN clustering approach to legal precedence retrieval. In: Twelfth international workshop on juris-informatics (JURISIN 2018)

  24. Li G, Wang Z, Ma Y (2019) Combining domain knowledge extraction with graph long short-term memory for learning classification of Chinese legal documents. IEEE Access 7:139616–139627. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2943668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu L, Liu L, Han Z (2020) Query revaluation method for legal information retrieval. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 18–21

  26. Locke D, Zuccon G (2017) Automatic cited decision retrieval: working notes of Ielab for FIRE legal track precedence retrieval task. FIRE (CEUR Vol-2036) pp 80–81

  27. Ma Y, Zhang P, Ma J (2018) An efficient approach to learning chinese judgment document similarity based on knowledge summarization. eprint1808.01843

  28. Mandal A, Ghosh K, Bhattacharya A, Pal A, Ghosh S (2017) Overview of the FIRE 2017 IRLeD track: information retrieval from legal Documents. In: FIRE (CEUR Vol-2036), pp 63–68

  29. Mandal S, Das SD (2019) Unsupervised identification of relevant cases & statutes using word embeddings. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 31–35

  30. Maxwell T, Schafer B (2008) Concept and context in legal information retrieval. 189:63–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-952-3-63

  31. More R, Patil J, Palaskar A, Pawde A (2019) Removing named entities to find precedent legal cases. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 13–18

  32. Padigi SV, Mayank M, Natarajan S (2019) Precedent case retrieval using wordnet and deep recurrent neural networks

  33. Rameshkannan R, Rajalakshmi R (2019) Dlrg@ aila 2019: context-aware legal assistance system. In: Proceedings of FIRE

  34. Renjit S, Idicula SM (2019) Cusat nlp@ aila-fire2019: similarity in legal texts using document level embeddings. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 25–30

  35. Sandeep G, Bharadwaj S (2017) An extraction based approach to keyword generation and precedence retrieval: BITS Pilani-Hyderabad. In: FIRE (CEUR Vol-2036), pp 74–77

  36. Sugathadasa K, Ayesha B, de Silva N, Perera AS, Jayawardana V, Lakmal D, Perera M (2018) Legal document retrieval using document vector embeddings and deep learning. In: Science and information conference, Springer, pp 160–175

  37. Thenmozhi D, Kannan K, Aravindan C (2017) A text similarity approach for precedence retrieval from legal documents. In: FIRE (CEUR Vol-2036), pp 90–91

  38. Tian L, Ning H, Kong L, Han Z, Xiao R, Qi H (2017) HLJIT2017@ IRLed-FIRE2017: information retrieval from legal documents. In: FIRE (CEUR Vol-2036), pp 82–85

  39. Van Opijnen M, Santos C (2017) On the concept of relevance in legal information retrieval. Artif Intell Law 25(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu M, Wu Z, Wang X, Han Z (2020) Retrieval model and classification model for aila2020. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 82–86

  41. Xu Y, Li T, Han Z (2020) The language model for legal retrieval and bert-based model for rhetorical role labeling for legal judgments. In: FIRE (Working Notes), pp 71–75

  42. Yang W, Zhang H, Lin J (2019) Simple applications of BERT for Ad Hoc document retrieval. eprint1903.10972

  43. Zhao Z, Ning H, Liu L, Huang C, Kong L, Han Y, Han Z (2019) Fire 2019@ aila: Legal information retrieval using improved bm25. FIRE (Working Notes) 2517:40–45

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SSN College of Engineering, Chennai, India

    Kayalvizhi Sampath & Thenmozhi Durairaj

Authors
  1. Kayalvizhi Sampath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thenmozhi Durairaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kayalvizhi Sampath.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sampath, K., Durairaj, T. PReLCaP : Precedence Retrieval from Legal Documents Using Catch Phrases. Neural Process Lett 54, 3873–3891 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10791-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10791-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation