Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Detection of Drug Abuse Using Rough Set and Neural Network-Based Elevated Mathematical Predictive Modelling

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the smart world scenario, the application of the Internet of Things is manifold as its utilization can be observed in health care services, home, and office automation, grid systems etc. This was evident during the current pandemic situation when detectors were developed to identify the infected and corresponding medication dosage to develop immunity in the healthcare delivery system. It helped the researchers to assess the required medical treatment with reliable and available data. Similarly, the impact of drugs is observed with the proposed predictive model and its pattern sequences, which act as a lifesaver by timely and accurate medication provided to the patients. This outcome is possible with enhancement and optimization in merging machine learning techniques. The vital objective of this study is to define an optimized framework that integrates rough set-based predictive models and adaptive multi-layer perceptron neural networks that utilize resilient backpropagation algorithms. A minimal set of attributes has been extracted by the Rough Set approach and classified using error optimized backpropagation neural network. model. The performance of the proposed model is evaluated via simulation analysis and compared with conventional backpropagation, resilient backpropagation, modified globally convergent version of resilient backpropagation, and support vector machine algorithms for better validation. The proposed optimized predictive models are found to reduce the cross-entropy values for drug consumption corresponding to alcohol, amphetamines, amyl nitrite, benzodiazepine, caffeine, chocolate, cocaine, heroin, mushrooms, and nicotine whose values are in the range between 0.0101 and 0.0039. Obtained results show that the rough set approach integrated adaptive multi-layer perceptron neural network with resilient backpropagation algorithm gives better performances than conventional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Availability of data and materials

Data used in the preparation of this research paper can be referred to in the below link; https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Drug+consumption+%28quantified%29.

References

  1. Aceto G, Ciuonzo D, Montieri A, Pescape A (2020) Toward effective mobile encrypted traffic classification through deep learning. Int J Neurocomput 409(1):306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.05.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acion L, Kelmansky D, van der Laan M, Sahker E, Jones D, Arndt S (2017) Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success. PLoS ONE 12(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adenuga KI, Muniru IO, Sadiq FI, Adenuga RO, Solihudeen MJ (2019) Big data in healthcare: are we getting useful insights from this avalanche of data. In: Proceedings of the 2019 8th international conference on software and information engineering (ICSIE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328833.3328841

  4. Bogg T, Roberts BW (2004) Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychol Bull 130(6):887–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bulut F, Bucak IO (2014) An urgent precaution system to detect students at risk of substance abuse through classification algorithms. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 22(3):690–707. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1208-60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Byvatov E, Fechner U, Sadowski J, Schneider G (2003) Comparison of support vector machine and artificial neural network systems for drug/nondrug classification. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43(6):1882–1889. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci0341161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y, Thosar SS, Forbess RA, Kemper MS, Rubinovitz RL, Shukla AJ (2001) Prediction of drug content and hardness of intact tablets using artificial neural network and near-infrared spectroscopy. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 27(7):623–631. https://doi.org/10.1081/ddc-100107318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen HE (2004) Information overload in health care. J Drug Top 148:26

    Google Scholar 

  9. Devarapalli D, Srikanth P, Rao MN, Rao JV (2016) Identification of AIDS disease severity based on computational intelligence techniques using clonal selection algorithm. Int J Converg Comput 2(3–4):193–207. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCONVC.2016.090084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Donovan JM, Soldz S, Kelley HF, Penk WE (1998) Four addictions: the MMPI and discriminant function analysis. J Addict Dis 17(2):41–55. https://doi.org/10.1300/j069v17n02_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubey C, Arora M, Gupta S, Kumar B (2010) Five factor correlates: a comparison of substance abusers and non-substance abusers. J Ind Acade Appl Psy 36(1):107–114

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fehrman E et al (2017) The five factor model of personality and evaluation of drug consumption risk. In: Palumbo F et al (eds) Data science, studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Springer, Berlin, pp 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55723-6_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Fehrman E, Egan V, Gorban AN, Levesley J, Mirkes EM, Muhammad AK (2019) Personality traits and drug consumption. A story told by data. Springer, Cham, pp 5–33

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fritsch S, Guenther F, Suling M, Mueller SM (2016) Package “neuralnet.” Version 1:33 (CRAN repository)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haberstick BC, Young SE, Zeiger JS, Lessem JM, Hewitt JK, Hopfer CJ (2014) Prevalence and correlates of alcohol and cannabis use disorders in the United States: results from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Drug Alcohol Depend 136(1):158–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.11.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Islam Arif M, Islam Sany S, Sharmin F, Sadekur Rahman M, Tarek Habib M (2021) Prediction of addiction to drugs and alcohol using machine learning: a case study on Bangladeshi population. Int J Electr Comput Eng 11(5):4471–4480. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v11i5.pp4471-4480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jafari H, Li X, Qian L (2016) Efficient processing of uncertain data using Dezert-Smarandachetheory: a case study. In: IEEE proceedings of 14th international conference on dependable, autonomic and secure computing, pp 715–722. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC-PICom-DataCom-CyberSciTec.2016.127

  18. Jang JDR, Sun CT, Mizutani E (2011) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing. A computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. PHI Learning, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  19. Janusz A, Slezak D (2014) Rough set methods for attribute clustering and selection. J Appl Artif Intell 28(3):220–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jensen R, Tuson A, Shen Q (2014) Finding rough and fuzzy-rough set reducts with SAT. J Inf Sci 255:100–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang P, Winkley J, Zhao C, Munnoch R, Min G, Yang LT (2016) An intelligent information forwarder for healthcare big data systems with distributed wearable sensors. IEEE Syst J 10(3):1147–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumari D, Kilam S, Nath P, Swerapadma A (2018) Prediction of alcohol abused individuals using artificial neural network. Int J Inf Technol 10(2):233–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-018-0094-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mathew PS, Pillai AS (2015) Big data solutions in healthcare: problems and perspectives. In: 2015 International conference on innovations in information, embedded and communication systems (ICIIECS), pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIECS.2015.7193211

  24. Mishra VP (2018) Big data mining methods in medical applications. In: Medical big data and internet of medical things—advances, challenges and applications, 1st edn. CRC Press. pp 1–23

  25. Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayan M (2021) Subsurface drain spacing in the unsteady conditions by HYDRUS-3D and artificial neural networks. Arab J Geosci 14:1936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08336-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M (2021) Computation of subsurface drain spacing in the unsteady conditions using artificial neural networks (ANN). Appl Water Sci 11:21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01356-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Palmieri FAN, Ciuonzo D (2013) Objective priors from maximum entropy in data classification. J Inf Fusion 14(2):186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. J Inf and Comp Sci 11:341–356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Springer Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Pawlak Z (1998) Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis. J Cybern Syst 29(7):661–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/019697298125470

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rudiments of rough sets. J Inf Sci 177:3–275

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Pirnazar et al (2018) The evaluation of the usage of the fuzzy algorithms in increasing the accuracy of the extracted land use maps. Int J Glob Environ Issues 17(4):307–321. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2018.095063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rioux C, Castellanos-Ryan N, Parent S, Seguin JR (2016) The interaction between temperament and the family environment in adolescent substance use and externalizing behaviors: Support for diathesis–stress or differential susceptibility? Dev Rev 40:117–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Riza LS, Janusz A, Bergmeiretal C (2014) Implementing algorithms of rough set theory and fuzzy rough set theory in the R package ‘“RoughSets.”’ J Inf Sci 287:68–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986). Learning internal representation by back propagating errors. In: Rumelhart DE, McCleland JL, the PDP Research Group (eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT Press, New York

  36. Sahker E, Acion L, Arndt S (2015) National analysis of differences among substance abuse treatment outcomes: college student and nonstudent emerging adults. J Am Coll Health 63(2):118–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2014.990970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Salih ASM, Abraham A (2014) Novel ensemble decision support and health care monitoring system. J Netw Inn Comp 2:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  38. Selvi S, Chandrasekaran M (2018) Performance evaluation of mathematical predictive modeling for air quality forecasting. J Clust Comput 22:12481–12493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1667-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Selvi S, Chandrasekaran M (2020) Framework to forecast environment changes by optimized predictive modelling based on rough set and elman neural network. J Soft Comp 24:10467–10480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04556-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shen Q, Chouchoulas A (2000) A modular approach to generating fuzzy rules with reduced attributes for the monitoring of complex systems. J Eng Appl Artif Intell 13:263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sivanandam SN, Deepa SN (2012) Principles of soft computing, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  42. Skowron A, Suraj Z (1996) A parallel algorithm for real-time decision making: a rough set approach. J Intell Inf Syst 7(1):5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Srikanth P, Devrapalli D (2016) A critical study of classification algorithms using diabetes diagnosis. In: 2016 IEEE 6th international conferences on advanced computing (IACC 2016), IEEE 2016, (Google Scholar), pp 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1109/IACC.2016.54

  44. Valero S, Daigre C, Rodrıguez-Cintas L, Barral C, Goma-i-Freixanet M, Ferrer M, Casas M, Roncero C (2014) Neuroticism and impulsivity: their hierarchical organization in the personality characterization of drug-dependent patients from a decision tree learning perspective. Compr Psychiatry 55(5):1227–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ventura CAA, de Souza J, Hayashida M, Ferreira PS (2014) Risk factors for involvement with illegal drugs: opinion of family members or significant others. J Sub Use 20(2):136–142. https://doi.org/10.3109/14659891.2013.875077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weinstein JN, Kohn KW et al (1992) Neural computing in cancer drug development: predicting mechanism of action. Science 258(5081):447–451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1411538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xian Z, Xin X, Xing H, Fuhong S, Wang X, Zhao B (2021) A Federated learning system with enhanced feature extraction for human activity recognition. Knowl Based Syst 229

  48. Xiao Z, Xu X, Xing H, Luo S, Dai P, Zhan D (2021) RTFN: a robust temporal feature network for time series classification. Inf Sci 571:65–86

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Xiao Z, Xu X, Xing H, Song F, Wang X, Zhao B (2021) A federated learning system with enhanced feature extraction for human activity recognition. Knowl Based Syst 229:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Xu H, Yu W, Griffith D, Golmie N (2018) A survey on industrial internet of things: a cyber-physical systems perspective. IEEE Access 6:78238–78259. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yasnitskiy LN, Gratsilev VI, Kulyashova JS, Cherepanov FM (2015) Possibilities of artificial intellect in detection of predisposition to drug addiction. Perm Univ Her Ser Philos Psychol Sociol 1(21):61–73

    Google Scholar 

  52. Young SE, Corley RP, Stallings MC, Rhee SH, Crowley TJ, Hewitt JK (2002) Substance use, abuse and dependence in adolescence: prevalence, symptom profiles and correlates. Drug Alcohol Depend 68(3):309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00225-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhang Z, Huang J (2019) Prediction of daily smoking behavior based on decision tree machine learning algorithm. In: 2019 IEEE 9th international conference on electronics information and emergency communication (ICEIEC), Beijing, China, pp 330–333. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIEC.2019.8784698

  54. Zhang Q, Xie Q, Wang G (2016) A survey on rough set theory and its applications. J CAAI Trans Intell Tech 1(4):323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trit.2016.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhu H, Chu B, Zhang C, Liu F, Jiang L, He Y (2017) Hyperspectral imaging for presymptomatic detection of tobacco disease with successive projections algorithm and machine-learning classifiers. Sci Rep 7(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04501-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Bargur, Tamilnadu, India

    S. Selvi

  2. Government College of Engineering, Bargur, Tamilnadu, India

    M. Chandrasekaran

Authors
  1. S. Selvi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Chandrasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SS conceived the concept, conducted experiments, developed the algorithm, and contributed to the preparation of this manuscript. MC participated in the design and helped to draft the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Selvi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selvi, S., Chandrasekaran, M. Detection of Drug Abuse Using Rough Set and Neural Network-Based Elevated Mathematical Predictive Modelling. Neural Process Lett 55, 2633–2660 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-11086-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-11086-z

Keywords