Skip to main content
Log in

Geometrically Preserved Dual Projections Learning for Multi-label Classification

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-label classification encounters great challenges in processing high dimensional input feature and output label spaces. In this paper, we propose a geometrically preserved dual projections learning of both label and feature spaces for multi-label classification. Different from traditional multi-label classification algorithms which learn appropriate feature dimensions directly from feature space, our proposed method learns dual label and feature space projections from both input feature and output label spaces simultaneously. Thus, achieving dimension reduction in both label and feature spaces. Furthermore, since labels and features are sampled from label and feature manifolds, respectively, we learn their geometric structures by constructing label and feature graphs. By geometrically preserving dual projections, better low rank structures in label and feature spaces are obtained, which further improves the performance of multi-label classification. Experimental results on several data sets such as cal500, enron, languagelog and rcv1s1, demonstrate the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art multi-label classification methods, such as MIFS, RAKEL, PLST, CPLST, GroPLE, CSSP, FaIE in LSDR and STOA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schapire RE, Singer Y (2004) Boostexter: a boosting-based system for text categorization. Mach Learn 39:135–168

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Y, Wen K, Gao Q, Gao X, Nie F (2018) Svm based multi-label learning with missing labels for image annotation. Pattern Recognit 78:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. BarutçSuoglu Z, Schapire RE, Troyanskaya OG (2006) Hierarchical multi-label prediction of gene function. Bioinformatics 22(7):830–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu H, Motoda H (2008) Computational methods of feature selection

  5. Soheili M, Eftekhari Moghadam AM (2016) Feature selection in multi-label classification through mlqpfs, pp. 430–434

  6. Li Y-F, Hu J-A, Jiang Y, Zhou Z-H (2012) Towards discovering what patterns trigger what labels, proceedings of the national conference on. Artif Intell 2:1012–1018

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen T-t, Liu K, Ding X-m, Zou H, Shen Q, Liu Y (2015) A multi-instance multi-label learning algorithm based on feature selection, pp. 587–590

  8. Chen Y-N, Lin H-T (2012) Feature-aware label space dimension reduction for multi-label classification. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2:1529–1537

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jian L, Li J, Shu K, Liu H (2016) Multi-label informed feature selection

  10. Valadi J, Ovhal P, Rathore K (2019) A simple method of solution for multi-label feature selection, pp. 1–4

  11. Stone JV (2004) Principal component analysis and factor analysis, pp. 129–135

  12. Kashef S, Nezamabadi-pour H (2017) An effective method of multi-label feature selection employing evolutionary algorithms, in: 2017 2nd Conference on Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation (CSIEC), pp. 21–25

  13. Zhang J, Luo Z, Li C, Zhou C, Li S (2019) Manifold regularized discriminative feature selection for multi-label learning. Pattern Recognit 95:136–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weng W, Chen Y-N, Chen C-L, Wu S, Liu J (2020) Non-sparse label specific features selection for multi-label classification. Neurocomputing 377:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tai F, Lin H-T (2012) Multilabel classification with principal label space transformation. Neural Comput 24(9):2508–2542

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin Z, Ding G, Hu M, Wang J (2014) Multi-label classification via feature-aware implicit label space encoding, in: E. P. Xing, T. Jebara (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 32 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, Bejing, China, pp. 325–333

  17. Kumar V, Pujari AK, Padmanabhan V, Kagita VR , Group preserving label embedding for multi-label classification, http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.09910

  18. Bhatia K, Jain H, Kar P, Varma M, Jain P (2015) Sparse local embeddings for extreme multi-label classification. In: Cortes C, Lawrence N, Lee D, Sugiyama M, Garnett R (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 28. Curran Associates Inc, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang J, Zhang P, Zhang H, Li G, Rui H (2020) Multi-label learning via feature and label space dimension reduction. IEEE Access 8:20289–20303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abeo TA, Jun Shen X, Gou J, Mao Q, Bao B, Li S (2019) Dictionary-induced least squares framework for multi-view dimensionality reduction with multi-manifold embeddings. IET Comput Vis 13:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganaa ED, Jun Shen X, Abeo TA (2021) Deflated manifold embedding pca framework via multiple instance factorings. Multim Tools Appl 80:3809–3833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roweis ST, Saul LK (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290:5500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Belkin M, Niyogi P (2003) Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Comput 15(6):1373–1396

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. He X, Niyogi P (2003) Locality preserving projections, in: NIPS

  25. Zhu Y, Kwok JT, Zhou Z-H (2018) Multi-label learning with global and local label correlation. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng 30:1081–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang R, Jiang W, Sun G (2018) Manifold-based constraint laplacian score for multi-label feature selection. Pattern Recognit Lett 112:346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang R, Wu Z (2021) Multi-label feature selection via manifold regularization and dependence maximization. Pattern Recognit 120:108149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin Z, Chen M, Ma Y, The augmented lagrange multiplier method for exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices, arXiv:1009.5055

  29. Liu W, Xu D, Tsang IW-H, Zhang W (2019) Metric learning for multi-output tasks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 41:408–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsoumakas G, Xioufis ES, Vilcek J, Vlahavas IP (2011) Mulan: a java library for multi-label learning. J Mach Learn Res 12:2411–2414

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsoumakas G, Katakis I, Vlahavas I (2011) Random k-labelsets for multilabel classification. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 23(7):1079–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded in part by Primary Research & Development Plan of Jiangsu Province (BE2018627)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang-Jun Shen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, ZF., Cai, RH., Abeo, T.A. et al. Geometrically Preserved Dual Projections Learning for Multi-label Classification. Neural Process Lett 55, 7369–7392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-023-11265-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-023-11265-6

Keywords

Navigation