Skip to main content
Log in

Performance comparisons of restoration techniques in optical burst switching networks

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes restoration techniques for OBS networks. First, we introduce the design issues to be essentially considered, when restoration techniques will be built into OBS networks. Second, considering the design issues, we propose a novel restoration model named “Recover-Then-Reserve,” which can enhance the restoration performance. Third, we develop a simulator using the NS-2 platform to verify the performance of the restoration techniques (path, link, and sub-path) designed by each restoration model (GMPLS-based OBS restoration and our proposal). Performance is evaluated on the following metrics: restoration success rate, restoration time, connection availability, and burst loss probability. The effects of the failure frequency and the number of the restoration attempts on the restoration performance are also investigated. Our experiments show that the proposal can reduce the restoration time by about 25 ms compared to the GMPLS-based OBS restoration model. Also, path restoration technique has better performance than link and sub-path restoration techniques because it has the highest restoration success rate, allowing similar restoration time. Our experiments also show that the more the restoration attempts made and the less the failure frequency becomes, the better the restoration performance obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang J., Mukheriee B.: A review of fault management in WDM mesh networks: basic concepts and research challenges. IEEE Netw. 18(2), 41–48 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang J., Sahasrabuddhe L., Mukherjee B.: Path vs. subpath vs. link restoration for fault management in IP-over-WDM networks: performance comparisons using GMPLS control signaling. IEEE Commun. Mag. 40(11), 80–87 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Battestilli T., Perros H.: An introduction to optical burst switching. IEEE Commun. Mag. 41(8), S10–S15 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Y., Qiao C., Yu X.: Optical burst switching (OBS)—a new area in optical networking research. IEEE Netw. 18(3), 16–23 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oh S.H., Kim Y.H., Yoo M.S., Hong H.H.: Survivability in the optical internet using the optical burst switch. ETRI J. 24(2), 117–130 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xin, Y., Teng, J., Karmous-Edwards, G., Rouskas, G.N., Stevenson D.: Fault management with fast restoration for optical burst switched networks. Broadband Netw. 34–42 (2004)

  7. Griffith D., SuKyoung L.: A 1+1 protection architecture for optical burst switched networks. IEEE JSAC 21(9), 1384–1398 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Banerjee A. et al.: Generalized multiprotocol label switching: an overview of signaling enhancements and recovery techniques. IEEE Commun. Mag. 39(7), 144–151 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Papadimitriou, D., et al.: Recovery (protection and restoration) terminology for generalized multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS). RFC 4427 (2006)

  10. Network Simulator. “NS-2,” available at http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Shik Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y.M., Ryu, M.S. & Park, H.S. Performance comparisons of restoration techniques in optical burst switching networks. Photon Netw Commun 17, 171–181 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-008-0151-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-008-0151-0

Keywords

Navigation