Skip to main content
Log in

Dialogue Abner Shimony–Shimon Malin

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Malin proposes a solution to some of the conceptual problems of the foundations of quantum mechanics within the framework of Alfred North Whitehead’s “Philosophy of Organism”. Standard quantum dynamics, governed by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, does not provide for the reduction of superpositions of physical states and hence does not account for occurrence of observational data. If consciousness is invoked to explain the results of measurements, it would appear that quantum mechanics is given an anthropocentric interpretation. Reduction of superpositions is achieved without anthropocentrism, according to Malin, by accepting Whitehead’s ontology of “actual occasions”, which are protomental entities independent of and presumably antedating human beings. Furthermore, Whitehead’s philosophy has the great virtue of offering a plausible solution to the profound problem of relating minds to material systems. Shimony is sympathetic to Whitehead’s world view, but with the reservation that it leaves an immense unexplained and unexplored gap between the conjectured “experience” of actual occasions and the high level experience of the human mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Popper K.R. (1957). “The propensity interpretation of the calculus of probability, and the quantum theory”. In: Koerner S. (eds) Observation and Interpretation. Butterworths Scientific Publications, London, pp. 65–70

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peirce C.S. (1932). “Notes on the doctrine of chances”. In: Hartshorne C., Weiss P. (eds) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, paragraphs 661–668, pp. 404–414

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heisenberg W. (1962). Physics and Philosophy. Harper, New York, p. 185

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schrödinger E. (1935). “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems”. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Einstein A., Podolsky B., and Rosen N. (1935). “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”. Phys. Rev. 47:777–780

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Eberhard, Nuovo Cimento 46B, 392 (1978); G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, Lettere Nuovo Cimento 27, 293 (1980); D. Page, Phys. Lett. 91A, 57 (1982).

  7. Bell J.S. (1964). “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox”. Physics 1:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Shimony, “Bell’s Theorem”, in Stanford Philosophical Encyclopedia (Internet), 2004.

  9. Lovejoy A.O. (1960). The Revolt Against Dualism. Open Court, La Salle IL

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stapp H.P. (1993). Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Penrose R. (1994). Shadows of the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shimon Malin.

Additional information

QUPON/QIPC Special Issue

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shimony, A., Malin, S. Dialogue Abner Shimony–Shimon Malin. Quantum Inf Process 5, 261–276 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-006-0019-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-006-0019-0

Keywords

PACS

Navigation