Skip to main content
Log in

Cheating on Complementarity and Interference by Translational – Internal Entanglement

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We show that if internal and momentum states of an interfering particle are entangled, then by measuring its internal state we may infer both path (corpuscular) and phase (wavelike) information with practically any precision, without the complementarity constraints of which-path detection. This holds also for multipath–multistate configurations, allowing large amounts of information to be stored in a single particle. We further show that highly complex particles (e.g., molecules or macroscopic bodies) subject to fields that couple (entangle) their internal and translational (momentum) states may undergo an irresversible randomization (diffusion), manifest by the disappearance of the interference pattern, as if they are subject to decoherence. Thus, translational-internal entanglement can give rise to anomalies in quantum wavepacket propagation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Bohm Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall physics series, 1951).

  2. Schmiedmayer J., Ekstrom C.R., Chapman M., Hammond T., Pritchard D.E. (1994). J. Phys. II 4:2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Hillery, L. Mlodinow, and V. Buzek, Phys. Rev. A 71, 062103 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Kolář, T. Opatrný, N. Bar-Gill, and G. Kurizki, LANL e-print archives: quant-ph/0507178, v2, 26 March 2006.

  5. Wootters W.K., Zurek W.H. (1979). Phys. Rev. D 19:473

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberger D.M., Yasin A. (1988). Phys. Lett. A 128:391

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaeger G., Shimony A., Vaidman L. (1995). Phys. Rev. A 51:54–67

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scully M.O., Englert B.-G., Walther H. (1995). Nature 375:367–368

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Englert B.-G. (1996). Phys. Rev Lett 77:2154–2157

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dürr S., Nonn T., Rempe G. (1998). Nature 395:33

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mei M., Weitz M. (2001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 86:559

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Akulin V.M., Karlov N.V. (1991). Intense Rosonant Interactions in Quantum Electronics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scully M.O., Zubairy M.S. (1997). Quantum Optics. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elitzur A.C., Vaidman L. (1993). Foundations Phys 23:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Hackermoller, S. Uttenthaler, K. Hornberger, E. Reiger, B. Brezger, A. Zeilinger, and M. Arndt, Phys. Rev. Lett 91, 90408 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zurek W.H. (2003). Rev. Mod. Phys. 75:715

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gershon Kurizki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurizki, G., Bar-Gill, N., Clausen, J. et al. Cheating on Complementarity and Interference by Translational – Internal Entanglement. Quantum Inf Process 5, 463–479 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-006-0031-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-006-0031-4

Keywords

PACS

Navigation