Abstract
A new unconditionally secure multi-party quantum commitment is proposed in this paper by encoding the committed message to the phase of a quantum state. Multi-party means that there are more than one recipient in our scheme. We show that our quantum commitment scheme is unconditional hiding and binding, and hiding is perfect. Our technique is based on the interference of phase-encoded coherent states of light. Its security proof relies on the no-cloning theorem of quantum theory and the properties of quantum information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 560, pp. 175–179. IEEE Computer Society (1984)
Watrous, J.: Zero-knowledge against quantum attacks. SIAM J. Comput. 39(1), 25–58 (2009)
Crpeau, C., Dumais, P., Mayers, D., Salvail, L.: Computational collapse of quantum state with application to oblivious transfer. In: Theory of Cryptography, In TCC 2004, LNCS 2951, pp. 374–393. Springer (2004)
Brassard G., Crepeau, C., Jozsa, R., Langlois, D.A.: quantum bit commitment scheme provably unbreakable by both parties. In: Proceedings FOCS 1993, pp. 362–371. IEEE Computer Society (1993)
Mayers, D.: Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78(17), 3414–3417 (1997)
Yuen, H.P.: Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is possible. Quantum Phys. arXiv:quant-ph/0505132v1 (2005)
Kent, A.: Unconditionally secure bit commitment with flying qudits. New J. Phys. 13(11), 113015–113029 (2011). (15)
Kent, A.: Unconditionally secure bit commitment by transmitting measurement outcomes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(13), 130501 (2012)
Liu, Y., Cao, Y., Curty, M., Liao, S.K., Wang, J., Cui, K., Li, Y.H., Lin, Z.H., Sun, Q.C., Li, D.D.: Experimental unconditionally secure bit commitment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(1), 010504 (2014)
Cheung, C.Y.: Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment using neutron double-slit interference. Quantum Phys. arXiv:0910.2645v4 (2010)
Unruh, D.: Computationally binding quantum commitments. In: Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT 2016, LNCS 9666, pp. 497–527. Springer (2016)
Unruh, D.: Collapse-binding quantum commitments without random oracles. In: Advances in Cryptology-ASIACRYPT 2016: Part II 22, LNCS 10032, pp. 166–195. Springer (2016)
Lu, X., Ma, Z., Feng, D.G.: An unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment scheme. Quantum Phys. arXiv:quant-ph/0403036v6 (2004)
Clarke, P.J., Collins, R.J., Dunjko, V., Andersson, E., Jeffers, J., Buller, G.S.: Experimental demonstration of quantum digital signatures using phase-encoded coherent states of light. Nat. Commun. 3(6), 1174 (2012)
Gottesman, D., Chuang, I.: Quantum digital signatures. Preprint at arxiv. org/ abs/ quant-ph/ 010503d2
Hoeffding, W.: Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58(301), 13–30 (1963)
Acknowledgements
We express our heartfelt thanks to reviewers for their useful comments which improve our manuscript greatly.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author is supported by National 973 Grant 2013CB834205 and NSFC Grant 61672019 and The Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University Grant 2016JC029.
Appendix A: experimental data of interfering phase
Appendix A: experimental data of interfering phase
In the cost matrix \(\mathbf C\), the diagonal elements represent the cases when recipient uses the same phase as sender, the off-diagonal elements represent the cases when recipient uses the phase different from sender. In 2012, Clarke et al. [14] presented us a practical experimental data, the cost matrix \(\mathbf C\) realized by experimental setup using 8 different phase states and with average photon number of \(|\alpha ^2|=0.16\) per pulse is given by
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, MQ., Wang, X. & Zhan, T. Unconditionally secure multi-party quantum commitment scheme. Quantum Inf Process 17, 31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-017-1804-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-017-1804-7