Abstract
The effects of \( 1/f^{\alpha } (\alpha =1,2)\) noise stemming from one or a collection of random bistable fluctuators (RBFs), on the evolution of entanglement, of three non-interacting qubits are investigated. Three different initial configurations of the qubits are analyzed in detail: the Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ)-type states, W-type states and mixed states composed of a GHZ state and a W state (GHZ-W). For each initial configuration, the evolution of entanglement is investigated for three different qubit–environment (Q-E) coupling setups, namely independent environments, mixed environments and common environment coupling. With the help of tripartite negativity and suitable entanglement witnesses, we show that the evolution of entanglement is extremely influenced not only by the initial configuration of the qubits, the spectrum of the environment and the Q-E coupling setup considered, but also by the number of RBF modeling the environment. Indeed, we find that the decay of entanglement is accelerated when the number of fluctuators modeling the environment is increased. Furthermore, we find that entanglement can survive indefinitely to the detrimental effects of noise even for increasingly larger numbers of RBFs. On the other hand, we find that the proficiency of the tripartite entanglement witnesses to detect entanglement is weaker than that of the tripartite negativity and that the symmetry of the initial states is broken when the qubits are coupled to the noise in mixed environments. Finally, we find that the 1 / f noise is more harmful to the survival of entanglement than the \( 1/f^{2} \) noise and that the mixed GHZ-W states followed by the GHZ-type states preserve better entanglement than the W-type ones.











Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)
Schrödinger, E.: Die gegenwärtige situation in der quantenmechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften 23, 807–8012 (1935)
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)
Bennett, C.H., Brenstein, H.J., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B.: Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations. Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996)
Nielsen, M., Chuang, I.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Bennett, C.H.: Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121 (1992)
Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Crepeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., Wootters, W.: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)
Benenti, G., Casati, G., Strini, G.: Principles of Quantum Computation and Information: Basic Tools and Special Topics. World Scientific, Singapore (2007)
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., Vedral, V.: Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)
Bennett, C.H., DiVincenzo, D.P., Smolin, J.A., Wootters, W.K.: Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996)
Gottesman, D.: Quantum information science and its contributions to mathematics. Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. 68, 13 (2009)
Maniscalco, S., Francica, F., Zaffino, R.L., Gullo, N.L., Plastina, F.: Protecting entanglement via the quantum Zeno effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 090503 (2008)
Facchi, P., Lidar, D., Pascazio, S.: Unification of dynamical decoupling and the quantum Zeno effect. Phys. Rev. A 69, 032314 (2004)
Lidar, D.A., Chuang, I.L., Whaley, B.: Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998)
Shin T.Y.: Quantum Correlations and Chaos in Multipartite Systems National, PhD Thesis, University of Singapore (2014)
Ma, J., Sun, Z., Wang, X., Nori, F.: Entanglement dynamics of two qubits in a common bath. Phys. Rev. A 85, 062323 (2012)
Lionel, T.K., Martin, T., Collince, F.G., Fai, L.C.: Effects of static noise on the dynamics of quantum correlations for a system of three qubits. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 30, 1750046 (2016)
Tchoffo, M., Kenfack, L.T., Fouokeng, G.C., Fai, L.C.: Quantum correlations dynamics and decoherence of a three-qubit system subject to classical environmental noise. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 131, 380 (2016)
Kenfack, L.T., Tchoffo, M., Fai, L.C., Fouokeng, G.C.: Decoherence and tripartite entanglement dynamics in the presence of Gaussian and non-Gaussian classical noise. Phys. B 511, 123 (2017)
Kenfack, L.T., Tchoffo, M., Fai, L.C.: Dynamics of tripartite quantum entanglement and discord under a classical dephasing random telegraph noise. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 132, 91 (2017)
Ali, M.: Robustness of genuine tripartite entanglement under collective dephasing. Chin. Phys. Lett. 32, 060302 (2015)
Wu, S.T.: Quenched decoherence in qubit dynamics due to strong amplitude-damping noise. Phys. Rev. A 89, 034301 (2014)
Ali, M.: Decoherence of genuine multipartite entanglement for local non-Markovian–Lorentzian reservoirs. Chin. Phys. B 24, 120303 (2015)
Kenfack, L.T., Tchoffo, M., Fouokeng, G.C., Fai, L.C.: Dynamics of tripartite quantum correlations in mixed classical environments: the joint effects of the random telegraph and static noises. Int. J. Quant. Inf. 15, 1750038 (2017)
Bandyopadhyay, S., Lidar, D.A.: Robustness of multiqubit entanglement in the independent decoherence model. Phys. Rev. A 72, 042339 (2005)
Chaves, R., Davidovich, L.: Robustness of entanglement as a resource. Phys. Rev. A 82, 052308 (2010)
Aolita, L., Cavalcanti, D., Chaves, R., Dhara, C., Davidovich, L., Acín, A.: Noisy evolution of graph-state entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 82, 032317 (2010)
Tian, L.-J., Yan, Y.-Y., Qin, L.-G.: Quantum correlation in three-qubit Heisenberg model with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Commun. Theor. Phys. 58, 39 (2012)
Wootters, W.K.: Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998)
Buscemi, F., Bordone, P.: Time evolution of tripartite quantum discord and entanglement under local and nonlocal random telegraph noise. Phys. Rev. A 87, 042310 (2013)
Li, M., Fei, S.M., Wang, Z.X.: A lower bound of concurrence for multipartite quantum states. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 42, 145303 (2009)
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., Vedral, V.: Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)
Rossi, M.A.C., Benedetti, C., Paris, M.G.A.: Engineering decoherence for two-qubit systems interacting with a classical environment. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 12, 1560003 (2014)
Benedetti, C., Buscemi, F., Bordone, P., Paris, M.G.A.: Dynamics of quantum correlations in colored-noise environments. Phys. Rev. A 87, 052328 (2013)
Benedetti, C., Paris, M.G.A., Buscemi, F., Bordone P.: Time-evolution of entanglement and quantum discord of bipartite systems subject to \( 1/f^{\alpha } \) noise. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Noise and Fluctuations (ICNF), Montpellier. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNF,6578952 (2013)
Benedetti, C., Buscemi, F., Bordone, P., Paris, M.G.A.: Effects of classical environmental noise on entanglement and quantum discord dynamics. Int. J. Quant. Inf. 10, 1241005 (2012)
De, A., Lang, A., Zhou, D., Joynt, R.: Suppression of decoherence and disentanglement by the exchange interaction. Phys. Rev. A 83, 042331 (2011)
Bergli, J., Galperin, Y.M., Altshuler, B.L.: Decoherence in qubits due to low-frequency noise. New J. Phys. 11, 025002 (2009)
Weissman, M.B.: \( 1/f \) noise and other slow, non exponential kinetics in condensed matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 537 (1988)
Koch, R.H., DiVincenzo, D.P., Clarke, J.: Model for \( 1/f \) flux noise in SQUIDs and qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 267003 (2007)
Paladino, E., Faoro, L., Falci, G., Fazio, R.: Decoherence and \( 1/f \) noise in Josephson qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 228304 (2002)
Kakuyanagi, K., Meno, T., Saito, S., Nakano, H., Semba, K., Takayanagi, H., Deppe, F., Shnirman, A.: Dephasing of a superconducting flux qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 047004 (2007)
Johanson, R.E., Gunes, M., Kasap, S.O.: \( 1/f \) Noise in doped and undoped amorphous silicon. J. Non-cryst. Sol. 242, 266 (2000)
Raquet, B., Anane, A., Wirth, S., Xiong, P., von Molnar, S.: Noise Probe of the dynamic phase separation in La 2/3 Ca 1/3 MnO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4485 (2000)
Jung, G., Paltiel, Y., Zeldov, E., Myasoedov, Y., Rappaport, M.L., Ocio, M., Bhattacharya, S.: M. J. Higgins. Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5112, p. 222 (2003)
Johnson, J.B.: The Schottky effect in low frequency circuits. Phys. Rev. 26, 71 (1925)
Sabin, C., Garcia-Alcaine, G.: A classification of entanglement in three-qubit systems. Eur. Phys. J. D 48, 435 (2008)
Gühne, O., Tóth, G.: Entanglement detection. Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009)
Weinstein, Y.S.: Tripartite entanglement witnesses and entanglement sudden death. Phys. Rev. A 79, 012318 (2009)
Acin, A., Andrianov, A., Costa, L., Jane, E., Latorre, J.I., Tarrach, R.: Generalized Schmidt decomposition and classification of three-quantum-bit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1560 (2000)
Kenfack, L.T., Tchoffo, M., Jipdi, M.N., Fuoukeng, G.C., Fai, L.C.: Dynamics of entanglement and state-space trajectories followed by a system of four-qubit in the presence of random telegraph noise: common environment (CE) versus independent environments (IEs). arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.02762 (2017)
Bergli, J., Galperin, Y.M., Altshuler, B.L.: Decoherence of a qubit by non-Gaussian noise at an arbitrary working point. Phys. Rev. B 74, 024509 (2006)
Benedetti, C., Paris, M.G.A., Maniscalco, S.: Non-Markovianity of colored noisy channels. Phys. Rev. A 89, 012114 (2014)
Bellomo, B., Lo Franco, R., Maniscalco, S., Compagno, G.: Entanglement trapping in structured environments. Phys. Rev. A 78, 060302 (2008)
Siomau, M., Fritzsche, S.: Entanglement dynamics of three-qubit states in noisy channels. Eur. Phys. J. D 60, 397–403 (2010)
Ma, X.S., Wang, A.M., Yang, X.D., You, Y.: Entanglement dynamics and decoherence of three-qubit system in a fermionic environment. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 38, 27612772 (2005)
Ma, X.S., Cong, H.S., Zhang, J.Y., Wang, A.M.: Entanglement dynamics of three-qubit states under an \( XY \) spin-chain environment. Eur. Phys. J. D 48, 285–292 (2008)
Guo, J.L., Song, H.S.: Entanglement dynamics of three-qubit coupled to an \( XY \) spin chain at finite temperature with three-site interaction. Eur. Phys. J. D 61, 791796 (2011)
Xu, J.-Z., Guo, J.-B., Wen, W., Bai, Y.-K., Yan, F.: Entanglement evolution of three-qubit mixed states in multipartite cavity-reservoir systems. Chin. Phys. B 21, 080305 (2012)
Siomau, M.: Evolution equation for entanglement of multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 82, 062327 (2010)
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Explicit forms of the time-evolved three-qubit density matrix: the case of GHZ-type states
Here, we give the explicit forms of the time-evolved density matrix obtained from Eq. (8) when the three qubits are initially prepared in the GHZ-type states of Eq. (10) and then subjected either to a collection of N RBFs or to a single RBF (N = 1) in common, independent and mixed environments. Throughout this section, we have
and
where the time-dependent function \( G_{n\lambda }(\gamma ,t) \) has been already defined in Eq. (21).
1.1 Independent environments (IE)
For this Q-E interaction configuration, we find that the density matrix of the system at a given time t can be written as
with \( \mathcal {E}(t)=12\tau (t)+1 \), \({\mathcal {K}}(t)=1-4\tau (t) \), \({\mathcal {F}}(t)=r-4\tau (t)\), and \( {\mathcal {D}}(t)=r+12\tau (t) \).
1.2 Mixed environments (ME)
On the other hand, for the case of ME coupling we find that the dynamics of the system is described by the following density matrix
where \( \mathcal {T}(t)=\chi (t)+\tau (t) \), \( {\mathcal {Y}}(t)=\chi (t)-\tau (t) \), \( \mathcal {G}(t)=\dfrac{r}{8}-\chi (t)\) and \( \mathcal {M}(t)= \dfrac{1}{8}-\chi (t)\)
1.3 Common environment (CE)
Finally, for the case of CE coupling, the density matrix describing the evolution of the system results into
where \( \mathcal {G}(t) \) and \( \mathcal {M}(t) \) have been already defined above.
We observe immediately that the form of the time-evolved density of the system initially prepared in the GHZ-type states depends upon the Q-E coupling configuration considered. This is in good agreement with the results of Ref. [30].
Appendix B: Explicit forms of the time-evolved three-qubit density matrix: the case of W-type states
Here, we give the explicit forms of the time-evolved density matrix obtained from Eq. (8) when the three qubits are initially prepared in the W-type states of Eq. (11) and then subjected either to a collection of N RBFs or to a single RBF (N = 1) in common, independent and mixed environments. Throughout this section, we recall that \(\eta _{n}(t)= \left[ \int \limits _{\gamma _{\min }}^{\gamma _{\max }}G_{n\lambda }(\gamma ,t){{\mathrm{P}}}(\gamma )\,\mathrm{d}\gamma \right] ^{2N}\), with \( n\in \left\{ 2,4,6 \right\} \).
1.1 Independent environments (IE)
If we set \( \mathcal {E}=1-r \), \( \mathcal {X}(t)=1+\eta _{2}(t) \) and \( {\mathcal {A}}=1-\eta _{2}(t) \), the density matrix for this configuration of the Q-E interaction can be written as
where
1.2 Mixed environments (ME)
On the other hand, when the subsystems are coupled in mixed environments, the time-evolved density matrix of the system takes the form
where
1.3 Common environment (CE)
Finally, for GHZ input configuration, the density matrix of the system at time t takes the following form when the qubits are coupled in a common environment
where
Appendix C: Explicit forms of the time-evolved three-qubit density matrix: the case of mixed states of Eq. (12)
Here, we give the explicit forms of the time-evolved density matrix obtained from Eq. (8) when the three qubits are initially prepared in the mixed states composed of a W state and a GHZ state of Eq. (12) and then subjected either to a collection of N RBFs or to a single RBF (N = 1) in common, independent and mixed environments. Once more, we recall that throughout this section, the function \(\eta _{n}(t)\) with \(n\in \left\{ 2,4,6\right\} \) is defined in Eq. (23).
1.1 Independent environments (IE)
In this Q-E configuration, the dynamics of the system is governed by the following density matrix
where
1.2 Mixed environments (ME)
Here, the time evolution of the system is governed by the following density matrix
where
1.3 Common environment (CE)
Finally, when the qubits are embedded in a common environment, the dynamics is governed by the following density matrix
with
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kenfack, L.T., Tchoffo, M., Fouokeng, G.C. et al. Dynamical evolution of entanglement of a three-qubit system driven by a classical environmental colored noise. Quantum Inf Process 17, 76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-1839-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-1839-4