Abstract
Sending-or-not sending twin-field quantum key distribution (SNS TF-QKD) removes the remaining security loopholes in original TF-QKD and can tolerate large misalignment errors. However, finite-key effects and intensity fluctuations of the photon sources would compromise its performance by lowering the secret key rate and then limiting the communication distance. In this paper, we present a method to estimate the lower bound of single-photon states yield for practical four-intensity decoy-state SNS TF-QKD. Based on this, we give a finite-key analysis without and with intensity fluctuations using improved Chernoff bound and Azuma’s inequality, respectively. Our simulation results show that both statistical and intensity fluctuations have a non-negligible effect on the performance of SNS TF-QKD and the effect of intensity fluctuations varies dramatically with different states. More precisely speaking, it is robust to the intensity fluctuations of the states with strong intensity while sensitive to the states with weak intensity. Our results emphasize that it is more significant to keep the stability of the weak states which could be modified in experiments with intensity modulators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. Theor. Comput. Sci. 560, 7 (2014)
Shor, P.W., Preskill, J.: Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(2), 441 (2000)
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.K., Pan, J.W.: Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92(2), 60 (2020)
Brassard, G., Lütkenhaus, N., Mor, T., Sanders, B.C.: Limitations on practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(6), 1330 (2000)
Lütkenhaus, N.: Security against individual attacks for realistic quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A 61(5), 052304 (2000)
Lydersen, L., Wiechers, C., Wittmann, C., Elser, D., Skaar, J., Makarov, V.: Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination. Nat. Photon 4(10), 686 (2010)
Gerhardt, I., Liu, Q., Lamas-Linares, A., Skaar, J., Kurtsiefer, C., Makarov, V.: Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system. Nat. Commun. 2(1), 349 (2011)
Li, H.W., Wang, S., Huang, J.Z., Chen, W., Yin, Z.Q., Li, F.Y., Zhou, Z., Liu, D., Zhang, Y., Guo, G.C., Bao, W.S., Han, Z.F.: Attacking a practical quantum-key-distribution system with wavelength-dependent beam-splitter and multiwavelength sources. Phys. Rev. A 84(6), 062308 (2011)
Lo, H.K., Curty, M., Qi, B.: Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(13), 130503 (2012)
Hwang, W.Y.: Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(5), 057901 (2003)
Wang, X.B.: Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(23), 230503 (2005)
Lo, H.K., Ma, X., Chen, K.: Decoy state quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(23), 230504 (2005)
Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z.L., Dynes, J.F., Shields, A.J.: Overcoming the rate—distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Nature 557(7705), 400 (2018)
Takeoka, M., Guha, S., Wilde, M.M.: Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution. Nat. Commun. 5(1), 5235 (2014)
Pirandola, S., Laurenza, R., Ottaviani, C., Banchi, L.: Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications. Nat. Commun. 8(1), 15043 (2017)
Wang, X.B., Yu, Z.W., Hu, X.L.: Twin-field quantum key distribution with large misalignment error. Phys. Rev. A 98(6), 062323 (2018)
Ma, X., Zeng, P., Zhou, H.: Phase-matching quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. X 8(3), 031043 (2018)
Tamaki, K., Lo, H.K., Wang, W., Lucamarini, M.: Information theoretic security of quantum key distribution overcoming the repeaterless secret key capacity bound. arXiv:1805.05511 [quant-ph] (2018)
Curty, M., Azuma, K., Lo, H.K.: Simple security proof of twin-field type quantum key distribution protocol. NPJ Quantum Inf. 5(1), 64 (2019)
Cui, C., Yin, Z.Q., Wang, R., Chen, W., Wang, S., Guo, G.C., Han, Z.F.: Twin-field quantum key distribution without phase postselection. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11(3), 034053 (2019)
Jiang, C., Yu, Z.W., Hu, X.L., Wang, X.B.: Unconditional security of sending or not sending twin-field quantum key distribution with finite pulses. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12(2), 024061 (2019)
Liu, Y., Yu, Z.W., Zhang, W., Guan, J.Y., Chen, J.P., Zhang, C., Hu, X.L., Li, H., Jiang, C., Lin, J., Chen, T.Y., You, L., Wang, Z., Wang, X.B., Zhang, Q., Pan, J.W.: Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution through sending or not sending. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(10), 100505 (2019)
Chen, J.P., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Jiang, C., Zhang, W., Hu, X.L., Guan, J.Y., Yu, Z.W., Xu, H., Lin, J., Li, M.J., Chen, H., Li, H., You, L., Wang, Z., Wang, X.B., Zhang, Q., Pan, J.W.: Sending-or-not-sending with independent lasers: secure twin-field quantum key distribution over 509 km. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(7), 070501 (2020)
Yu, Z.W., Hu, X.L., Jiang, C., Xu, H., Wang, X.B.: Sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution in practice. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 3080 (2019)
Zhou, X.Y., Zhang, C.H., Zhang, C.M., Wang, Q.: Asymmetric sending or not sending twin-field quantum key distribution in practice. Phys. Rev. A 99(6), 062316 (2019)
Hu, X.L., Jiang, C., Yu, Z.W., Wang, X.B.: Sending-or-not-sending twin-field protocol for quantum key distribution with asymmetric source parameters. Phys. Rev. A 100(6), 062337 (2019)
Jiang, C., Yu, Z.W., Hu, X.L., Wang, X.B.: Sending-or-not-sending twin-filed quantum key distribution with discrete phase modulation. arXiv:2009.00816 [quant-ph] (2020)
Qiao, Y., Chen, Z., Zhang, Y., Xu, B., Guo, H.: Sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution with light source monitoring. Entropy 22(1), 36 (2019)
Chernoff, H.: A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Ann. Math. Stat. 23(4), 493 (1952)
Curty, M., Xu, F., Cui, W., Lim, C.C.W., Tamaki, K., Lo, H.K.: Finite-key analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Nat. Commun. 5(1), 3732 (2014)
Zhang, Z., Zhao, Q., Razavi, M., Ma, X.: Improved key-rate bounds for practical decoy-state quantum-key-distribution systems. Phys. Rev. A 95(1), 012333 (2017)
Azuma, K.: Weighted sums of certain dependent random variables. Tohoku Math. J. 19(3), 357 (1967)
Wang, Y., Bao, W.S., Zhou, C., Jiang, M.S., Li, H.W.: Tight finite-key analysis of a practical decoy-state quantum key distribution with unstable sources. Phys. Rev. A 94(3), 032335 (2016)
He, S.F., Wang, Y., Li, J.J., Bao, W.S.: Asymmetric twin-field quantum key distribution with both statistical and intensity fluctuations. Commun. Theor. Phys. 72(6), 065103 (2020)
Müller-Quade, J., Renner, R.: Composability in quantum cryptography. New J. Phys. 11(8), 085006 (2009)
Tomamichel, M., Lim, C.C.W., Gisin, N., Renner, R.: Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryptography. Nat. Commun. 3(1), 634 (2012)
Acknowledgements
The project was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0302600) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (61675 235, 61605248 and 61505261).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, YF., Wang, Y., Jiang, MS. et al. Finite-key analysis of sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution with intensity fluctuations. Quantum Inf Process 20, 135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-021-03070-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-021-03070-8