Abstract
This work deals with the derivation of a receiver structure for the quantum detection of information-carrying coherent states used in photonic communications systems, that employ the degrees of freedom of both the complex amplitude and the state of polarization in the quantum state, producing a high dimensional modulation in the form of a constellation of quantum composite coherent states to be transmitted in the optical channel. Our receiver is based on the extension of the positive operator value measurements (POVM) in the constellation Hilbert space, towards projective measurements in a larger Hilbert space. Starting from the measurement vectors obtained from an optimum detection/discrimination strategy-the square root method (SRM) in our case-, and basing our analysis on the Naimark extension, we present a procedure for building those projectors for a received modulation format of composite coherent states. We analytically derive the orthogonal and idempotent projectors, arriving at closer form expressions for the considered modulation format, their decomposition in unitary rotations, and suggest a receiver configuration for its physical realization. Finally, an error probability analysis of our modulation formats is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Cariolaro, G.: Quantum communications. Springer Berlin (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15600-2
Bergou, J.A., Herzog, U., Hillery, M.: Discrimination of quantum states, in: Paris, M., Rehacek, J. (eds) Quantum State Estimation, pp. 417–465, Springer, Berlin (2004) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44481-7_11
Barnett, S.M., Croke, S.: Quantum state discrimination. Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 238–278 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.1.000238
Barnett, S.M., Clarke, R.B.M., Kendon, V.M., Riis, E., Chefles, A., Sasaki, M.: Experimental quantum state discrimination. In: Tombesi, P., Hirota, O. (eds) Quantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement 3. Springer, Boston, MA. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47114-0_11
Helstrom, C. W.: Quantum detection and estimation theory. Academic Press, New York (1976) ISBN: 978-0124110113
Yuen, H., Kennedy, R., Lax, M.: Optimum testing of multiple hypotheses in quantum detection theory. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 21(2), 125–134 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1975.1055351
Vilnrotter, V., Lau, C.: Quantum detection and channel capacity for communications applications. Proc. SPIE 4635 Free-Space Laser Commun. Technol. XIV (2002) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.464084
Eldar, Y.C., Megretski, A., Verghese, G.C.: Designing optimal quantum detectors via semidefinite programming. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 49(4), 1007–1012 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2003.809510
Nakahira, K., Kato, K.: Iterative methods for finding optimal quantum measurements under minimum-error and minimax criteria. Phys. Rev. A 91, 012318 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.012318
Jezek, M., Rehacek, J., Fiurasek, J.: Finding optimal strategies for minimum-error quantum-state discrimination. Phys. Rev. A 65, 060301 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.060301
Ban, M., Kurokawa, K., Momose, R., Hirota, O.: Optimum measurements for discrimination among symmetric quantum states and parameter estimation. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 36(6), 1269–1288 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435921
Helstrom,C.W., Bayes-Cost Reduction Algorithm in Quantum Hypothesis Testing, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, VOL. IT-28, NO. 2, pp. 359–366 (1982)
Kato, K., Hirota, O.: Square-root measurement for quantum symmetric mixed state signals. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2003.820050
Takeoka, M., Sasaki, M., van Loock, P.: Design of POVMs with linear optics and continuous measurement. In: Guo, G.C., Lo, H.K., Sasaki, M., Liu, S., (eds.) Quantum Optics and Applications in Computing Communications II, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 5631 pp. 68–77 (2005), doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.576708
Sasaki, M., Hirota, O.: Construction of an optimum detection for binary pure-state signals, Phys. Lett. A 224: 2I3–219 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0375-9601(96)00839-0
Osaki, M., Ban, M., Hirota, O.: Derivation and physical interpretation of the optimum detection operators for coherent-state signals. Phys. Rev. A 54(2), 1691–1701 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1691
Momose, R., Sasaki, M., Hirota, O.: Physical interpretation of optimum quantum detection operators, in: Hirota, O., Holevo, A.S., Caves, C.M. (eds), Quantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement, Springer, Boston, MA, (1997), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5923-8_31
Eldar, Y.C., Forney, G.D.: On quantum detection and the square root measurement. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47(3), 858–872 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/18.915636
Hausladen, P., Wootters, W.K.: A ‘pretty good’ measurement for distinguishing quantum states. J. Mod. Opt. 41(12), 2385–2390 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349414552221
Dalla Pozza, N., Pierobon, G.: Optimality of square-root measurements in quantum state discrimination. Phys. Rev. A 91(4), 042334 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.042334
Kato, K.: Square-root measurement for ternary coherent state signal, tamagawa university quantum ICT research institute. Bulletin 3(1), 29–33 (2013)
Kato, K., Hirota, O.: Quantum quadrature amplitude modulation system and its applicability to coherent-state quantum cryptography In Meyers, R.E., Shih, Y. (eds) Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging III, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 5893 (2005) doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.618719
Vilnrotter, V., Lau, C.W.: Quantum Detection Theory for the Free-Space Channel,” The Inter Planetary Network Progress Report 42–146 (2001) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, pp. 1–34 (2001) http://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/tmo/progress report/42–146/146B.pdf
Kim, Y., Ko, Y. C.: Detection of quantum circular QAM signals, in 2013 IEEE International Conference on ICT Convergence (ICTC), pp. 1078–1082 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC.2013.6675560
Mandel, L., Wolf, E.: Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, Chapter 11, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995) DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644105
Corndorf, E., Barbosa, G., Liang, C., Yuen, H.P., Kumar, P.: High-speed data encryption over 25 km of fiber by two-mode coherent-state quantum cryptography. Opt. Lett. 28(2), 2040–2042 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.28.002040
Marwah, A.S., Lutkenhaus, N.: Characterization of Gram matrices of multi-mode coherent states. Phys. Rev. A (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.012346
Chou, C.L., Hsu, L.Y.: Minimum-error discrimination between symmetric mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042305 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042305
Fujihara, Y., Usuda, T.S., Takumi, I., Hata, M.: Relationship between optimum quantum detection operators for pure and mixed-state signals. Electron. Commun. Jpn. Part 3 86(10), 8–18 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/ECJC.1153
Clarke, R.B.M., Kendon, V.M., Chefles, A., Barnett, S.M., Riis, E., Sasaki, M.: Experimental realization of optimal detection strategies for overcomplete states. Phys Rev A. 64: 012303 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012303
Millar, D.S., Koike-Akino, T., Arık, S.O., Kojima, K., Parsons, K., Yoshida, T., Sugihara, T.: High-dimensional modulation for coherent optical communications systems. Opt. Express 22(7), 8798–8812 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.008798
Mumtaz, S., Othman, G. R. B., Jaouën, Y.: Space-time codes for optical fiber communication with polarization multiplexing. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications (pp. 1–5) (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2010.5502528
Aymeric, R., Jaouën, Y., Ware, C., Alléaume, R.: Symbiotic joint operation of quantum and classical coherent communications, in 2022 IEEE Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC) (pp. 1–3) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2022.W2A.37
Djordjevic, I.B.: LDPC-coded M-ary PSK optical coherent state quantum communication. J. Lightwave Technol. 27(5), 494–499 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2008.2004566
Karlsson, M.: Four-dimensional rotations in coherent optical communications. J. Lightwave Technol. 32, 1246–1257 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2014.2301878
Zuo, Y., Chen, T., 2, Zhu, B.: Conditional Pulse Nulling Receiver for Multi-pulse PPM and Binary Quantum Coding Signals, Fourth International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications, Ma, M., Arrasmith, W., Li, P. (eds.) Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9902, 99020V SPIE CCC code: 0277–786X/16/$18 (2016) doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2262106
Chen, J., Habif, J.L., Dutton, Z., Lazarus, R., Guha, S.: Optical codeword demodulation with error rates below the standard quantum limit using a conditional nulling receiver. Nat. Photonics 6, 374–379 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/NPHOTON.2012.113
Boroson, D.M., Toward optimum efficiency in a quantum receiver for coded PPM, In: Cugny, B., Karafolas, N., Sodnik, Z. (eds.) ICSO 2016 International Conference on Space Optics, Biarritz, France, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 10562 105623M-1 (2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2296040
Horoshko, D.B., Eskandari, M.M., Kilin, S.Y.: Equiprobable unambiguous discrimination of quantum states by symmetric orthogonalization. Phys. Lett. A 383, 1728–1732 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2019.03.006
Waseda, A., Takeoka, M., Sasaki, M., Fujiwara, M., Tanaka, H.: Quantum detection of wavelength-division-multiplexing optical coherent signals. JOSA B 27(2), 259–265 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.27.000259
Fujihara, Y., Tatsuta, S., Usuda, T., S., Takumi, I., Hata, M.: Realization of Quantum Receiver for M-Ary Signals, IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences Vol.E84-A No.4 pp. 906–912 (2001)
Sasaki, M., Hirota, O.: Two examples of measurement processes illustrating Helstrom’s optimum decision bound. Phys. Lett. A 210, 2l–25 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(95)00844-6
Sasaki, M., Hirota, O.: Optimum decision scheme with a unitary control process for binary quantum-state signals. Phys. Rev. A 54, 4 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.2728
Brandt, H.E.: Quantum measurement with a positive operator-valued measure. J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 5(3), S266 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4266/5/3/357
DallaPozza, N., Paris, M.G.A.: Naimark extension for the single-photon canonical phase measurement. Phys. Rev. A. 100, 032126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.032126
Dalla Pozza, N., Paris M.G.A.: An Effective Iterative Method to Build the Naimark Extension of Rank-N POVMs. Int. J. Quant. Inf. 15(4): 1750029 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749917500290
Tabia, G.N.M.: Experimental scheme for qubit and qutrit symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measurements using multiport devices. Phys. Rev. A 86, 062107 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.062107
Chan, V.: Characterization of measurements in quantum communications, M.I.T., RLE Report 489 (1975)
Andersson, E.: Quantum Measurements. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK, Lecture Notes for WAQCT Summer School (2019)
Arvizu-Mondragon, A., Mendieta-Jimenez, F.J., Lopez-Mercado, C., Muraoka-Espiritu, R.: Detection of polarization shift-keyed/switched/multiplexed quantum coherent states in M-ary photonic communication systems. Quantum Inf. Process. 21, 345 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-022-03687-3
Arvizu-Mondragon, A., Mendieta-Jimenez, F.J., Lopez-Mercado, C., Muraoka-Espiritu, R.: Measurement vectors for quantum coherent states in M-ary photonic communications with polarization degree of freedom (Submitted)
Zhou, X., Yu, J.: Multi-level, multi-dimensional coding for high-speed and high-spectral-efficiency optical transmission. IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 27, 3641–3653 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2009.2022765
Renaudier, J., et al.: Generation and detection of 28 Gbaud polarization switched-QPSK in WDM long-haul transmission systems. J. Lightwave Technol. 30, 1312–1318 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2012.2185682
Kikuch, K.: Quantum theory of noise in stokes vector receivers and application to bit error rate analysis. J. Lightwave Technol. 38, 3164–3172 (2020)
Guo, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, L., Huang, D.: Polarization-multiplexed quadrature amplitude modulation for continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Int. J. Theor. Phys. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-018-3924-y
Morsy-Osman, M., Chagnon, M., Plant, D.V.: Four-dimensional modulation and stokes direct detection of polarization division multiplexed intensities inter polarization phase and inter polarization differential phase. J. Lightwave Technol. 34, 1585–1592 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2016.2521172
José Capmany, J., Fernández-Pousa, C.R.: Quantum model for electro-optical phase modulation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, A119–A129 (2010)
Ataman, S.: The quantum optical description of a double Mach-Zehnder interferometer, arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.1704, 2014
Betti, S., Curti, F., De Marchis, G., Iannone, E.: Multilevel coherent optical system based on stokes parameters modulation. J. Lightwave Technol. 8, 1127–1136 (1990)
Betti, S., De Marchis, G., Iannone, E., Lazzaro, P.: Homodyne optical coherent systems based on polarization modulation. J. Lightwave Technol. 9(I0), 1314–1320 (1991)
Perrone, P., Betti, S., Rutigliano Giuseppe, G.: Multidimensional modulation in optical fibers. Int. Res. J. Opt. Photonics 2, 1–8 (2018)
Agrell, E., Karlsson, M.: Power-efficient modulation formats in coherent transmission systems. J. Lightwave Technol. 27, 5115–5126 (2009)
Cusack, B.J., Sheard, B.S., Shaddock, D.A., Gray, M.B., Lam, P.K., Whitcomb, S.E.: Electro-optic modulator capable of generating simultaneous amplitude and phase modulations. Appl. Opt. 43, 50795091 (2004)
Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H.J., Bertani, P.: Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58–61 (1994)
Knill, E., Lafamme, R., Milburn, G.J.: A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature, Vol 409 (2001)
Van Loock, P., Lutkenhaus, N.: Simple criteria for the implementation of projective measurements with linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 69, 012302 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.012302
He, B., Bergou, J.A., Wang, Z.: Implementation of quantum operations on single-photon qudits. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042326 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042326
Burenkov, I. A., Jabir, M. V., Polyakov, S. V.: Practical quantum-enhanced receivers for classical communication, AVS Quantum Sci. 3: 025301, (2021) https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0036959
Cariolaro, G., Pierobon, G.: Performance of quantum data transmission systems in the presence of thermal noise. IEEE Trans. Commun. 58, 623–630 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2010.02.080013
Yuan, R., Zhao, M., Han, S., Cheng, J.: Kennedy receiver using threshold detection and optimized displacement under thermal noise. IEEE Commun. Lett. 24, 1313–1317 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2020.2980537
Teklu, B., Genoni, M.G., Olivares, S., Paris, M.G.A.: Phase estimation in the presence of phase diffusion: the qubit case. Phys. Scr. T140, 014062 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2010/T140/014062
Gough, J., Interferometric Phase Estimation Though Quantum Filtering in Coherent States arXiv:1601.04374v1 [quant-ph], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1601.04374
Tsang, M., Shapiro, J.H., Lloyd, S.: Quantum theory of optical temporal phase and instantaneous frequency. Phys. Rev. A. 78, 053820 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.053820
DiMario, M.T., Kunz, L., Banaszek, K.: Optimized communication strategies with binary coherent states over phase noise channels. NPJ Quantum Inf 5, 65 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0177-4
Teklu, B., Trapani, J., Olivares, S., Paris. M.G.A., Noisy quantum phase communication channels, Phys. Scr. 90: 074027 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-949/90/7/074027
Trapani, J., Teklu, B., Olivares, S., Paris, M.G.A.: Quantum phase communication channels in the presence of static and dynamical phase diffusion. Phys. Rev. A 92, 012317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.012317}
Olivares, S., Cialdi, S., Castelli, F., Paris, M.G.A.: Homodyne detection as a near-optimum receiver for phase-shift-keyed binary communication in the presence of phase diffusion. Phys. Rev. A 87, 050303 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.050303}
Ishimura, S., Kikuchi, K.: Multi-dimensional permutation-modulation format for coherent optical communications. Opt. Express 23(12), 15587–15597 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.015587
Gallion, P., Mendieta, F.J., Jiang, S.: Signal and quantum noise in optical communication and in cryptography. In: Wolf, E. (ed.) Progress in Optics, Vol. 52, Elsevier, Netherlands (2009) ISBN: 9780444533500
Eldar, Y.C., Forney, G.D.: Optimal tight frames and quantum measurement. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 48, 599–610 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/18.985949
Ahnert, S.E., Payne, M.C.: General implementation of all possible positive-operator-value measurements of single photon polarization states. Phys. Rev. A 71, 012330 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.012330
Clarke, R.B.M., Chefles, A., Barnett, S.M., and Riis, E.: Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous state discrimination, Phys. Rev. A, 63: 040305(R) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.040305
Funding
This work has been partially supported by the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Composite quantum coherent states
In a scalar constellation of K symbols, the quantum state corresponding to its k-th point is represented by a single-mode ket in Dirac's notation: \(\left|{\gamma }_{k}\right.>\), \(k=\mathrm{0,1},\dots , K-1\) in a Hilbert space \({\mathcal{H}}_{0}\) of dimension dim(\({\mathcal{H}}_{0}\)); the state matrix is defined as:
Multidimensional modulation formats must be formulated as vector modulations of order N, and we need a composite Hilbert space \({\mathcal{H}}_{C}\) with dimension dim(\({\mathcal{H}}_{C}\)) = [dim(\({\mathcal{H}}_{0}\))]N, and each composite state of the constellation \(\left|{\gamma }_{k}\right.>\) in Eq. (1) is itself given by the N-fold tensor product:
which is called an N-mode state; in M-ary modulation formats, the original Hilbert space \({\mathcal{H}}_{0}\) has dimension dim(\({\mathcal{H}}_{0}\)) = 2, corresponding to the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components of a single polarization mode, as represented by N = 2 original states in Eq. (12):
where the components \({\gamma }_{k, 0, I}\) and \({\gamma }_{k, 0 ,Q}\) are respectively the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) of one of the polarization components of the optical field (SOP "0"); and \({\gamma }_{k, 1 ,I}\) and \({\gamma }_{k, 1, Q}\) are the corresponding quadratures of the antipodal polarization component (SOP "1"); "0" / "1" can represent the horizontal / vertical, left-circular / right-circular or any two antipodal SOPs on the Poincaré sphere.
With the polarization degree of freedom, we then work in a twofold composite Hilbert space \({\mathcal{H}}_{C}\) of dimension dim(\({\mathcal{H}}_{C}\)) = 4, and, depending on the specific M-ary modulation format, the K states of the four-dimensional (4D) constellation \(\left|{\gamma }_{k}\right.>\) are now given by tensor products from permutations of the elements of the following 4D modulation vector [78]:
In this work we develop our analysis for quantum coherent states \(\left|\propto \right.>\), expanded into a Fock state (number-state) basis \(\left|n\right.> , n=0,\dots ,\infty \) [79]:
where \({\left|\propto \right|}^{2}\) is the average number of photons \({N}_{s}\) in the state \(\left|\propto \right.>\).
For the case of pure coherent states, the inner product of a couple of states is calculated as:
and the absolute value of the degree of superposition of a coherent state of average number of photons \({{N}_{s}=\left|\Delta \right|}^{2}\), with vacuum \(\left|0\right.>\):
Finally, for the N-mode tensor states of Eq. (3), the overlap is computed by the rule [7, 25]:
Appendix 2: Quantum measurement vectors
Our aim is to construct a POVM with measurement vectors \(\left|{\mu }_{k}>\right.\) optimized to distinguish between a set of K pure states \(\left|{\upgamma }_{k}\right.>\) that span a subspace \({\mathcal{U}\subseteq \mathcal{H}}_{C}\); a convenient approach is to find a collection of vectors \(\left|{\mu }_{k}>\in \mathcal{U}\right.\) that are “closest” to the original states \(\left|{\upgamma }_{k}\right.>,\) in the least-squares sense, such that the measurement consists of K rank-one POVMs of the form \({\widehat{\Pi }}_{k}=\left|{\mu }_{k}>\right.<{\mu }_{k}|, k=0,...,K-1\) [18, 80].
The SRM method is based on the "measurement matrix" \( \pmb{\mathcal{M}}\) whose elements \(\left|{\mu }_{k}>, \right.\) are the measurement vectors
so that the projections of the vectors onto their corresponding states are as "close" as possible to the generating states, as shown in Fig.
10 for a given state \(\left|{\gamma }_{k}>\right.\), where the projections are given by the normalized inner products \(<{\gamma }_{k}\left|{\mu }_{k}\right.>\) between the k-th measurement vector and its corresponding state, with the criterion of keeping the differences \(\left|{e}_{k}\right.>=\left|{\gamma }_{k}\right.>-\left|{\mu }_{k}\right.>\) as small as possible; the SRM finds the measurement vectors minimizing the quadratic error as the sum of the square norm of the error vectors:
For the derivation of the optimal measurement matrix, the SRM method starts from the Gram matrix \(\mathcal{G}\) of the constellation \({\varvec{\Gamma}}\); \(\mathcal{G}\) is a Hermitian positive definite K × K square matrix, obtained from the inner products between all couples of composite states:
the optimal measurement matrix is given by [1]:
where the inverse square root matrix \({{\varvec{G}}}^{-1/2}\) has the elements \({G}_{kl}^{-1/2}\); the measurement vectors are then given by the linear combinations of the generating states:
the measurement vectors are then used to form the rank-one POVMs [81, 82]:
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Arvizu-Mondragón, A., Mendieta-Jiménez, F.J., López-Mercado, C.A. et al. A receiver for quadrature/polarization modulated quantum coherent states in photonic communications employing the Naimark extension. Quantum Inf Process 22, 348 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-04103-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-04103-0