Abstract
In this paper, we propose a protocol for generating N-qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) states in a superconducting system. The physical model contains N superconducting flux qubits and a cavity, where the N superconducting flux qubits are coupled to the cavity simultaneously. The preparation of GHZ states can be realized in one step by applying a pair of classical fields to each qubit. The protocol is promising for generating N-qubit GHZ states because the operation time is independent of the number of the qubits in the strong drive regime. Furthermore, we consider the effects of random noise and decoherence, and numerical simulations show that the protocol is insensitive to these disturbing factors. Therefore, the protocol may be useful in the generation of GHZ states.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the article.
References
Zheng, S.B., Guo, G.C.: Efficient scheme for two-atom entanglement and quantum information processing in cavity QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2392
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
Friis, N., Vitagliano, G., Malik, M., Huber, M.: Entanglement certification from theory to experiment. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-018-0003-5
Man, Z.X., Xia, Y.J., An, N.B.: Robustness of multiqubit entanglement against local decoherence. Phys. Rev. A 78, 064301 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.064301
Xiao, L., Lu Long, G., Deng, F.G., Pan, J.W.: Efficient multiparty quantum-secret-sharing schemes. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052307 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052307
Pan, J.W., Zeilinger, A.: Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger-state analyzer. Phys. Rev. A 57, 2208 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2208
Facchi, P., Florio, G., Pascazio, S., Pepe, F.V.: Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger States and few-body Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 260502 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.260502
Michler, M., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A.: Interferometric bell-state analysis. Phys. Rev. A 53, R1209 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.53.R1209
Ghosh, S., Kar, G., Roy, A., Sen(De), A., Sen, U.: Distinguishability of bell states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 277902 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.277902
Jung, E., Hwang, M.R., Ju, Y.H., Kim, M.S., Yoo, S.K., Kim, H., Park, D., Son, J.W., Tamaryan, S., Cha, S.K.: Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger versus \(W\) states: quantum teleportation through noisy channels. Phys. Rev. A 78, 012312 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012312
Ma, J., Huang, Y.X., Wang, X.G., Sun, C.P.: Quantum fisher information of the Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state in decoherence channels. Phys. Rev. A 84, 022302 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.022302
Hao, J.C., Li, C.F., Guo, G.C.: Controlled dense coding using the Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state. Phys. Rev. A 63, 054301 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.054301
Greenberger, D.M., Horne, M.A., Zeilinger, A.: Multiparticle interferometry and the superposition principle. Phys. Tod. 46, 22 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881360
Pan, J.W., Bouwmeester, D., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A.: Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement. Cah. Rev. Theor. 403, 515 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35000514
Zhang, C., Huang, Y.F., Wang, Z., Liu, B.H., Li, C.F., Guo, G.C.: Experimental Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger-type six-photon quantum nonlocality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 260402 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.260402
Misra, B., Sudarshan, E.G.: The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. J. Math. Phys. 18, 756 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.523304
Gerry, C.C.: Preparation of a four-atom Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state. Phys. Rev. A 53, 4591 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.53.4591
Wu, S., Zhang, Y.: Multipartite pure-state entanglement and the generalized Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states. Phys. Rev. A 63, 012308 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.012308
Cohen, O., Brun, T.A.: Distillation of Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states by selective information manipulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5908 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5908
Zheng, S.B.: One-step synthesis of multiatom Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 230404 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.230404
Yang, C.P., Han, S.: Preparation of Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entangled states with multiple superconducting quantum-interference device qubits or atoms in cavity QED. Phys. Rev. A 70, 062323 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062323
Guerra, E.: Realization of GHZ states and the GHZ test via cavity QED. J. Mod. Opt. 52, 1275 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340512331330855
Yang, C.P.: Preparation of \(n\)-qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entangled states in cavity QED: an approach with tolerance to nonidentical qubit-cavity coupling constants. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062302 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062302
Chen, Z.H., Pei, P., Zhang, F.Y., Song, H.S.: One-step preparation of three-particle Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states in cavity quantum electrodynamics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29, 1744 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.29.001744
Ryu, J., Lee, C., Żukowski, M., Lee, J.: Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger theorem for \(N\) qudits. Phys. Rev. A 88, 042101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.042101
Yang, C.P., Su, Q.P., Zhang, F.Y., Zheng, S.B.: Single-step implementation of a multiple-target-qubit controlled phase gate without need of classical pulses. Opt. Lett. 39, 3312 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.003312
Zhang, C.L., Li, W.Z., Chen, M.F.: Generation of W state and GHZ state of multiple atomic ensembles via a single atom in a nonresonant cavity. Opt. Commun. 312, 269 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2013.09.047
Shan, W.J., Chen, Y.H., Xia, Y., Song, J.: One-step deterministic generation of \( N \)-atom Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states in separate coupled cavities via quantum Zeno dynamics. J. Mod. Opt. 62, 1591 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2015.1052857
Shan, W.J., Xia, Y., Chen, Y.H., Song, J.: Fast generation of \(N\)-atom Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state in separate coupled cavities via transitionless quantum driving. Quan. Inf. Pro. 15, 2359 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-016-1284-1
Wu, J.L., Song, C., Xu, J., Yu, L., Ji, X., Zhang, S.: Adiabatic passage for one-step generation of \(N\)-qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states of superconducting qubits via quantum Zeno dynamics. Quan. Inf. Pro. 15, 3663 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-016-1366-0
Yang, C.P., Su, Q.P., Zheng, S.B., Nori, F.: Entangling superconducting qubits in a multi-cavity system. New J. Phys. 18, 013025 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/013025
Zhang, X., Chen, Y.H., Shi, Z.C., Shan, W.J., Song, J., Xia, Y.: Generation of three-qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states of superconducting qubits by using dressed states. Quan. Inf. Pro. 16, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-017-1758-9
Bergamasco, N., Menotti, M., Sipe, J.E., Liscidini, M.: Generation of path-encoded Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states. Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 054014 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.054014
Song, C., Xu, K., Li, H., Zhang, Y.R., Zhang, X., Liu, W., Guo, Q., Wang, Z., Ren, W., Hao, J., et al.: Generation of multicomponent atomic Schrödinger cat states of up to 20 qubits. Science 365, 574 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay0600
Li, Z., Han, Y.G., Zhu, H.: Optimal verification of Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 054002 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.054002
Unanyan, R.G., Vitanov, N.V., Bergmann, K.: Preparation of entangled states by adiabatic passage. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 137902 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.137902
Berry, M.V.: Transitionless quantum driving. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 42, 365303 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/36/365303
Chen, X., Torrontegui, E., Muga, J.G.: Lewis-Riesenfeld invariants and transitionless quantum driving. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062116 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062116
Takahashi, K.: Transitionless quantum driving for spin systems. Phys. Rev. E 87, 062117 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.062117
Han, J.X., Wu, J.L., Wang, Y., Xia, Y., Jiang, Y.Y., Song, J.: Large-scale Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states through a topologically protected zero-energy mode in a superconducting qutrit-resonator chain. Phys. Rev. A 103, 032402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.032402
Shore, B.W., Knight, P.L.: The Jaynes–Cummings model. J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1195 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349314551321
Bonatsos, D., Daskaloyannis, C., Lalazissis, G.A.: Unification of Jaynes–Cummings models. Phys. Rev. A 47, 3448 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.3448
Yu, S., Rauch, H., Zhang, Y.: Algebraic approach to the Jaynes–Cummings models. Phys. Rev. A 52, 2585 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.2585
Zou, X., Pahlke, K., Mathis, W.: Quantum phase-gate implementation for trapped ions in thermal motion. Phys. Rev. A 66, 044307 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.66.044307
Yang, C.P., Su, Q.P., Zheng, S.B., Han, S.: Generating entanglement between microwave photons and qubits in multiple cavities coupled by a superconducting qutrit. Phys. Rev. A 87, 022320 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.022320
Kang, Y.H., Shi, Z.C., Huang, B.H., Song, J., Xia, Y.: Erratum: flexible scheme for the implementation of nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 101, 049902 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.049902
Mao, Y., Yu, K., Isakov, M.S., Wu, J., Dunn, M.L., Jerry Qi, H.: Sequential self-folding structures by 3D printed digital shape memory polymers. Sci. Rep. 5, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13616
Zhao, B., Tan, Y., Tsai, W.Y., Qi, J., Xie, C., Lu, L., Schwartz, L.H.: Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging. Sci. Rep. 6, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23428
Kang, Y.H., Chen, Y.H., Shi, Z.C., Huang, B.H., Song, J., Xia, Y.: Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation using Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. A 97, 042336 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.042336
Mirrahimi, M., Leghtas, Z., Albert, V.V., Touzard, S., Schoelkopf, R.J., Jiang, L., Devoret, M.H.: Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation. New J. Phys. 16, 045014 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/045014
Liu, T., Zhou, Y.H., Wu, Q.C., Yang, C.P.: Generation of a GHZ-type optical entangled coherent state without measurements. Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 244001 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0134394
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants Nos. 11575045, 11874114, the Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar of Fujian Province under Grant 2020J06011, the Foundation of Fujian Educational Committee under Grant FBJY20230048, and Project from Fuzhou University under Grant JG2020001-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: The calculation of the system evolution
Assuming that
then, we get
We define the symmetric Dicke state with k qubits being in the \(|+\rangle \) as
where \(\{P_j\}\) denotes the set of all distinct permutation of the qubits. Therefore, the tensor product states of N qubits are
respectively. According to Eq. (A.4), when the evolution operator \(U(\tau )\) acts on the initial state \(|\psi _0\rangle \), for \(N=2\eta \), the final state of the system \(\vert \psi _f\rangle \) can be written as
When \(\eta \) is odd, Eq. (A.5) can be reduced to
When \(\eta \) is even, Eq. (A.5) can be reduced to
Therefore, for the case that N is even, setting \(\phi =0\), the N-qubit GHZ states can be obtained.
For \(N=2\eta -1\), the final state of the system \(\vert \psi _f\rangle \) can be written as
Thus, for the case that N is odd, setting \(\phi =-\frac{\pi }{2}\), Eq. (A.8) is reduced to
When \(\eta \) is odd, Eq. (A.9) can be reduced to
When \(\eta \) is even, Eq. (A.9) can be reduced to
Therefore, the N-qubit GHZ states can be obtained. The calculations are the same as that in the case where N is even.
Appendix B: The derivation of the evolution operator
Due to
we have
Here we used the relations
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, DS., Kang, YH., Chen, YH. et al. Efficient generation of Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states of N driven qubits mediated by a cavity. Quantum Inf Process 23, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-04199-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-04199-4