Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Research and citation impact of publications by the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper analyses the citations to 1733 publications published during 1970–1999 by the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, using Science Citation Index 1982–2003 as the source data. The extent of citations received, in terms of the number of citations per paper, yearwise break up of citations, domainwise citations, self-citations and citations by others, diachronous self-citation rate, citing authors, citing institutions, highly cited papers, the categories of citing documents, citing journals and distribution of citations among them etc. are determined. During 1982–2003 chemistry Division publications have received a total of 11041 citations. The average number of citations per year was 501.86. The average number of citations per publication was 6.37. The highest number of citations received were 877 in 2001. The citation rate was peaked during 1990–2003 as maximum 9145 (82.82%) citations were received during the period. Total self-citations were 3716 (33.66%) and citations by others were 7325 (66.34%). Mean diachronous self-citation rate was 36.16. Citation time lag was zero for 144 (15.52%) papers and one year for 350 (37.72%) papers. Single authored publications (168) have received 456 (4.13%) citations and 1565 multi-authored publications have received 10585 (95.87%) citations. The core citing authors were: J. P. Mittal (695) followed by V. K. Jain (524), H. Mohan (471), T. Mukherjee (307), R. M Iyer (253), H. Pal (251), J. V. Yakhmi (211), A. V. Sapre (174), D. K. Palit (161), N. M. Gupta (128), and S. K. Kulshrestha (116). Citation life cycles of four highly cited papers was discussed. The core journals citing Chemistry Division publications were: J. Phys. Chem.-A (436 citations), Chem. Phys. Lett. (372), J. Phys. Chem. (355), J. Chem. Phys. (353), J. Organomet. Chem. (285), J. Phys. Chem.-B (279), J. Photochem. Photobiol.-A (263), Langmuir (245), J. Am. Chem. Soc. (226), Physica-C (225), Radiat. Phys. Chem. (217), Inorg. Chem. (215) and Indian J. Chem.-A (207).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop, N., Gillet, V. J., Holliday, J. D., Willet, P. (2003), Chemoinformatics research at the University of Sheffield: A history and citation analysis, Journal of Information Science, 29: 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1993), Has the AIDS research epidemic spread too far? New Scientist, 138: 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. P., Gibb, F., Harris, M., Irvin, J., Martin, B. R., Narin, F. (1988). Bibliographic profiles for British academic institutions: An experiment to develop research output indicators, Scientometrics, 14: 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. E. (1981), Publication rate as a function of laboratory size in three biomedical research institutions, Scientometrics, 3: 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (1984), The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citation in Scientific Communication, London: Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizon, L. B., Sadorra, M. S. M. (1995), Patterns of publication by the staff of an International Fisheries Research Center, Scientometrics, 32: 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, C., Resler, L. (2001), Analysis of publications and citations from a Geophysics Research Institute, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 701–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gami, A. S., Montori, V. M., Wilczynski, N. L., Haynes, R. B. (2004), Author self-citation in the diabetes literature, CMAJ, 17: 1925–1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1977), Caution urged in the use of citation analysis, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2: N84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1978), Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science, 168: 471–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1979), Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1979), Is citation analysis a legitimate tool? Scientometrics, 1: 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1994), The concept of citation indexing: A unique and innovative tool for navigating the research literature, Current Contents, (4): 3–6.

  • Garfield, E. (1994), The relationship between citing and cited publications: A question of relatedness, Current Contents, (34): 3–5.

  • Garg, K. C., Rao, M. K. D. (1988), Bibliometric analysis of scientific productivity: A case study of an Indian physics laboratory, Scientometrics, 13: 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. S., Neufeld, M. L. (1974), Uncitedness of articles in the Journal of the American Chemical Society, Information Storage and Retrieval, 10: 365–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. S. (1975), Uncitedness of articles in Nature: A multidisciplinary scientific journal, Information Processing & Management, 11: 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., Schlemmer, B. (2004), A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication, Scientometrics, 95: 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., Suresh Kumar, Khanna, H. K. (1999), Science in India: Performance of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research laboratories based on the productivity profile of scientists, Research Evaluation, 8: 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, Y. (1986), Emergence of basic research on the periphery: Organic chemistry in India, 1907–1926, Scientometrics, 10: 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kademani, B. S., Kalyane, V. L. (1996), Outstandingly cited and most significant publications of R. Chidambaram, a nuclear physicist, Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 1: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kademani, B. S., Vijai Kumar, Ganesh Surwase, Anil Sagar, Lalit Mohan, Gaderao, C. R., Anil Kumar, Kalyane, V. L., Prakasan, E. R. (2005), Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity of the Chemistry Division at BhabhaAtomic Research Centre, Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 10: 65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kademani, B. S., Vijai Kumar, Anil Kagar, Lalit Mohan, Ganesh Surwase, Gaderao, C. R. (2005), Publication productivity of the Bio-organic Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre: A scientometric study, Annals of Library and Information Studies, 52: 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kademani, B. S., Vijai Kumar, Lalit Mohan, Anil Sagar, Anil Kumar, Gaderao C. R., Surwase, G. (2006), Scientometric dimensions and publication productivity of the Analytical Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, SRELS Journal of Information Management, 43: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyane, V. L., Kalyane, S. V. (1991), Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity system, Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 38: 8–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaic, B. (1990), Scientometric analysis of the research activities of Chemists from the Rugjer Bošković Institute (Yugoslavia) 1976–1985, Scientometrics, 19: 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. J., Kim, B. J. (2000), A bibliometric analysis of publications by the Chemistry Department, Seoul National University, Korea, 1992–1998, Journal of Information Science, 26: 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. (1998), The use of bibliometric techniques for institutional research evaluation: A study of Avian Virology Research, Scientometrics, 41: 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koganuramath, M. M., Angadi, M., Kademani, B. S. (2002), Bibliometric dimension of innovation communication productivity of Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 7: 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laharia, S. N., Singh, Y. P. (1987), Scientific productivity measurement, Productivity, 18: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, F. W. (1991), Bibliometric Methods in Assessing Productivity and Impact of Research, Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M. (1997), Citation analysis and the quality of scientific productivity, Bioscience, 27: 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M. (1980), Quality, Collaboration and Citations in Cancer Research, Florida State University: Ph. D. Theses.

  • Lawani, S. M. (1982), On the heterogeneity and classification of author self citations, Journal of American Society for Information Science, 33: 342–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. K. (2003), A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore, Scientometrics, 56: 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. (1993), The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies, Journal of Documentation, 49: 407–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Roberts, M. H., Mac Roberts, B. R. (1989), Problems of citation analysis: A critical review, Journal of American Society for Information Science, 40: 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, B. S. (1993), The measure of science and scientists, Current Science, 65: 511–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. R., Irvin, J. (1983), Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radioastronomy, Research Policy, 12: 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martyn, J. (1975), Progress in documentation: Citation analysis, Journal of Documentation, 31: 290–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minor, L., Dostatni, P. (1991), A bibliometric study of the publications of the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), Scientometrics, 22: 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., Vriens, M. (1989), Possible inaccuracies in citation analysis, Journal of Information Science, 15: 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, M. J. (1973), Measures of scientific growth, Research Policy, 2: 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, M. J., Murugesan, P., Shearer, E. (1976), An analysis of citation patterns in Indian Physics, Science and Culture, 42: 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalimov, V. V., Adler, Y. P., Granovsky, Y. V. (1966), Information systems in the mathematical theory of experiment, In: V. V. Nalimov (Ed.), Moscow: Kibernetica i Dokumentalistik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F. (1976), Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activities, New Jersey: Computer Horizons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Carpenter, M. P., Woolf, P. (1983), Technological performance assessments based on patents and patent citations, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-31: 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (1995), Suggestion for research topics in citations and publication analysis, Library Science with a slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 32: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, G. W. (1980), Research productivity of the State Agricultural experiment Station System — measured by scientific publication output, Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, 762: 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandison, A. (1989), Thinking about citation analysis, Journal of Documentation, 45: 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, H. P., Sen, B. K. (2005), Non-citing to an Indian paper in Superconductivity, Current Science, 88: 1875–1876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schloegl, C., Gorraiz, J., Bart, C., Bargmann, M. (2003), Evaluating two Australian university departments: Lessons learned. Scientometrics, 56: 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1981), Some scientometric measures of publishing performance for 85 Hungarian Research Institutes, Scientometrics, 3: 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C., Bayer, A. E. (1986), Author collaboration and impact: A note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles, Scientometrics, 10: 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., Greenlee, E. (1979), A Citation and Publication Analysis of U. S. Industrial Organisations, Philadelphia: ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. C. (1981), Citation analysis, Library Trends, Summer: 83–106.

  • Stern, R. E. (1990), Uncitedness in the biomedical literature, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41: 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taube, G. (1993), Measure for measure in science, Science, 260: 884–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugolini, D., Parodi, S., Santi, L. (1997), Analysis of publication quality in Cancer Research Institute, Scientometrics, 38: 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswarlu, K. S., George, A. M. (1998), Chemistry in Atomic Energy Programmes: An Account of 50 Years, 1948–1997 — A saga of excellence and relevance, Mumbai: Bhabha Atomic Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (1990), Bibliometric analysis of publication activity of a scientific research Institute, In: L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds), Informetrics, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers: 309–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (2004), Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators, Current Science, 79: 602–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankevich, W. F. (1982), Analysis of publication and invention productivity in some Soviet academic institutions, Scientometrics, 4: 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallmark, J. T., Sedig, K. G. (1986), Quality of research measured by citation method by peer review — A comparison, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Em-33: 218–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachos, G. (1991), Research output evaluation of two university departments in Greece with the use of bibliometric indicators, Scientometrics, 21: 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scientific Information Resource Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, 400 085, India

    B. S. Kademani, Vijai Kumar, Ganesh Surwase, Anil Sagar, Lalit Mohan, Anil Kumar & C. R. Gaderao

Authors
  1. B. S. Kademani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vijai Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ganesh Surwase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anil Sagar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lalit Mohan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anil Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C. R. Gaderao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. S. Kademani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kademani, B.S., Kumar, V., Surwase, G. et al. Research and citation impact of publications by the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Scientometrics 71, 25–57 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1651-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1651-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation