Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of the accounting literature

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most scientific disciplines, a number of divergent and often highly specialized research areas are examined, which is reflected in substantial differences among journal scopes. Using the accounting literature as an example, we argue that this diversity in scopes should be considered when assessing journal influence. Concretely, we examine a citation-based structural influence measure for a sample of 41 accounting journals. Next, we identify sub-areas in the accounting literature and we explore journal influence in these sub-areas. Our results clearly demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between overall and sub-area influence. In addition, we show that sub-areas should be identified using a fuzzy clustering procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axarloglou, K., Theoharakis, V. (2003), Diversity in Economics: An Analysis of Journal Quality Perceptions (available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=379120)

  • Azar, O. H. (2006), Behavioral economics and socio-economics journals: a citation-based ranking, forthcoming in The Journal of Socio-Economics.

  • Ballas, A., Theoharakis, V. (2003), Exploring diversity in accounting through faculty journal perceptions, Contemporary Accounting Research, 20 (4): 619–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B. (1978), Social psychology of citations, Canadian Psychological Review, 19: 158–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Olia, A., Von Bailey, D. (2000), Subdiscipline-specific journal rankings: whither Applied Economics? Applied Economics, 32 (2): 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., Pieters, R. (2003), The structural influence of marketing journals: a citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time, Journal of Marketing, 67: 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, V. A., Ryan, R. J. (1989), Performance indices and related measures of journal reputation in accounting, British Accounting Review, 21 (3): 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beed, C., Beed, C. (1996), Measuring the quality of academic journals: the case of economics, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18 (3): 369–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. J., Brenner, V. C. (1974), Perceptions of journal quality, The Accounting Review, 49 (April): 360–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, S. E., Hesford, J. W., Van Der Stede, W. A., Young, S. M. (2006), The most influential journals in academic accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31 (7): 663–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Fernandez, M. T., Gomez, I. (2002), Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance, Scientometrics, 53: 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borokhovich, K. A., Bricker, R. J., Brunarski, K., Simkins, B. J. (1995), Finance research productivity and influence, Journal of Finance, 50: 1691–1717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bricker, R. (1989), An empirical investigation of the structure of accounting research, Journal of Accounting Research, 27 (2): 246–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bricker, R. J., Borokhovich, K. A., Brunarski, K., Simkins, B. J. (2003), The impact of accounting research on finance, Critical Perspectives On Accounting, 14: 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Gardner, J. C. (1985)A, Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (CAR), Journal of Accounting Research, 23 (1): 84–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Gardner, J. C. (1985)B, Applying citation analysis to evaluate the research contributions of accounting faculty and doctoral programs, The Accounting Review, 60 (2): 262–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Huefner, R. J. (1994), The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (1): 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K. H., Cox, R. A. K., Mitchell, J. B. (2001), Citation patterns in the finance literature, Financial Management, 30: 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., Shihadeh, E. S. (1994), Statistical Models for Ordinal Variables, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupé, T. (2004), What do we know about ourselves? On the economics of economics, Kyklos, 57: 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1955), Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas, Science, 122: 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., Schlemmer, B. (2004), A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication, Scientometrics, 59: 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., Thijs, B., Schubert, A. (2006), A concise review on the role of author selfcitations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy, Scientometrics, 67: 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1991), Measures, models, and graphical displays in the analysis of cross-classified data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86: 1085–1111.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Guthrie, J., Parker, L. (2002), Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship, Accounting Forum, 26 (1): 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkidi, M., Batistakis, Y., Vazirgiannis, M. (2002)A, Cluster validity methods: part I, SIGMOD Record, 31 (2).

  • Halkidi, M., Batistakis, Y., Vazirgiannis, M. (2002)B, Cluster validity methods: part II, SIGMOD Record, 31 (3).

  • Halkidi, M., Vazirgiannis, M. (2001), Clustering validity assessment: finding the optimal partitioning of a data set, Proceedings of ICDM Conference, California, USA.

  • Harzing, A.-W. (2004), Journal Quality List, 8th edition (available on http://www.harzing.com)

  • Herron, T., Hall, T. (2005), Faculty perceptions of journals: Quality and publishing feasibility, Journal of Accounting Education, 22: 175–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (1999), The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences, Scientometrics, 44: 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, R. P., Wright, G. B. (1990), Faculty perceptions of journal quality: An update, Accounting Horizons, 4 (1): 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. J., Podsakoff, P. M. (1994), Journal influence in the field of management: an analysis using Salancik’s index in a dependency network journal, Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1392–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. J., Brinn, T., Pendlebury, M. (1996), Journal evaluation methodologies: a balanced response, Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 24 (5): 607–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.-W., Kim, Y.-I., Lee, D., Lee, K. H. (2005), Assessing the quality of fuzzy partitions using relative intersection, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 88 (3): 594–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, F., Legany, C., Babos, A. (2005), Cluster Validity Measurement Techniques, Department of Automation and Applied Informatics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

  • Kurmis, A. P. (2003), Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), 85: 2449–2454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D. N., Piette, M. J. (1994), The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970–1990, Journal of Economic Literature, 32 (2): 640–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. (1993), The complexities of citation practice: a review of citation studies, Journal of Documentation, 49: 370–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J., Lowe, A. (2002), Problematising the construction of journal quality: an engagement with the mainstream, Accounting Forum, 26 (1): 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A., Locke, J. (2005), Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30 (1): 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Roberts, H., Mac Roberts, B. (1989), Problems of citation analysis: A critical review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40: 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcrae, T. W. (1974), A citational analysis of the accounting information network, Journal of Accounting Research, 12 (1): 80–92.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Medoff, M. H. (2006), The efficiency of self-citations in economics, Scientometrics, 69: 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., Van Leeuwen, TH. N. (1996), Impact factors can mislead, Nature, 381: 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., Van Leeuwen, TH. N., Reedijk, J. (1999), Towards appropriate indicators of journal impact, Scientometrics, 46: 575–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W. J., Newman, R. J., Turnbull, G. K. (2001), Reputational capital and academy pay, Economic Inquiry, 39 (4): 663–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, M. J., Murugesan, P. (1975), Some results on the function and quality of citations, Social Studies of Sciences, 5: 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. L., Cudd, R. M., Crain, J. L. (1990), The potential bias in accounting journal ratings: evidence concerning journal specific bias, Accounting Education Journal, 3 (1): 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J. (1985), Evaluating research output through life work citation counts, Scientometrics, 7: 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J. (2006), Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A review, Scientometrics, 66 (1): 81–100.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J., Van Raan, A. F. J. (1993), A bibliometric analysis of six economics research groups: A comparison with peer review, Research Policy, 22: 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osareh, F. (1996), Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: a review of literature I, Libri, 46: 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L., Guthrie, J., Gray, R. (1998), Accounting and management research: passwords from the gatekeepers, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 11 (4): 371–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, R., Baumgartner, H. (2002), Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals, Journal of Economic Literature, 40: 483–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, R., Baumgartner, H., Vermunt, J., Bijmolt, T. (1999), Importance and similarity in the evolving citation network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16: 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinstein, A., Hasselback, J. R. (1997), A literature review of articles assessing the productivity of accounting faculty members, Journal of Accounting Education, 15 (3): 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinstein, A., Calderon, T. G. (2006), Examining accounting departments’ rankings of accounting journals, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17: 457–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R. (1986). An index of subgroup influence in dependency networks, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (2): 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schildt, H. A., Matisson, J. T. (2006), A dense network sub-grouping algorithm, Scientometrics, 67: 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., Sweeney, E., Greenlee, E. (1985)A, Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. 1: A comparison of methods, Scientometrics, 7: 391–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., Sweeney, E., Greenlee, E. (1985)B, Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. 2: Mapping science, Scientometrics, 8: 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G., Krogstad, J. L. (1984), Impact of sources and authors on Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory-a citation analysis, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 4 (1): 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G., Krogstad, J. L. (1988), A taxonomy of content and citations in Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 8 (1): 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G., Krogstad, J. L. (1991), Sources and uses of Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory’s literature: the first decade, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10 (2): 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E. P. (2004), Publishing in the majors: A comparison of accounting, finance, management and marketing, Contemporary Accounting Research, 21 (1): 223–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahai, A., Rigsby, J. T. (1998), Information processing using citations to investigate journal influence in accounting, Information Processing & Management, 34 (2/3): 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, M.-Y., Xu, H., Wu, C.-W. (2003), Journal co-citation analysis of semiconductor literature, Scientometrics, 57 (1): 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vastag, G., Montabon, F. (2002), Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management, Omega, 18: 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T. (2006), The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible, Scientometrics, 66 (1): 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K. (1997), LEM: A General Program for the Analysis of Categorical Data, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Catholic University Brussels - Member of the K.U. Leuven Association, Brussels, Belgium

    Geert van Campenhout

  2. European University College Brussels (EHSAL) - Member of the K.U. Leuven Association, Brussels, Belgium

    Tom van Caneghem

  3. Lessius Hogeschool - Member of the K.U. Leuven Association, Antwerp, Belgium

    Steve van Uytbergen

  4. European University College Brussels (EHSAL) - Member of the K.U. Leuven Association, Stormstraat 2, 1000, Brussels, Belgium

    Tom van Caneghem

Authors
  1. Geert van Campenhout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tom van Caneghem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steve van Uytbergen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom van Caneghem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Campenhout, G., van Caneghem, T. & van Uytbergen, S. A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of the accounting literature. Scientometrics 77, 61–90 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1907-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1907-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation