Skip to main content
Log in

Scientific production in Computer Science: A comparative study of Brazil and other countries

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present a study about scientific production in Computer Science in Brazil and several other countries, as measured by the number of articles in journals and conference proceedings indexed by ISI and by Scopus. We compare the Brazilian production from 2001 to 2005 with some Latin American, Latin European, BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China), and other relevant countries (South Korea, Australia and USA). We also classify and compare these countries according to the ratio of publications in journals and conferences (the ones indexed by the two services).

The results show that Brazil has by far the largest production among Latin American countries, has a production about one third of Spain’s, one fourth of Italy’s, and about the same as India and Russia. The growth in Brazilian publications during the period places the country in the mid-range group and the distribution of Brazilian production according to impact factor is similar to most countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. M. Albuquerque, R. Simoes, A. Baessa, B. Campolina, L. Silva, A distribuicao espacial da producao cientifica e tecnologica brasileira: uma descricao de estatisticas de producao local de patentes e artigos cientificos, in Portuguese. Revista Brasileira de Inovacao, 1(2) (2002) 225–251.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Glänzel, J. Leta, B. Thijs, Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, 67(1) (2006) 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Leta, W. Glänzel, B. Thijs, Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67(1) (2006) 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Leta, R. Jacques, I. Figueira, L. Meis, Central international visibility of Brazilian psychiatric publications from 1981 to 1995. Scientometrics, 50(1) (2001) 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Figueira, R. Jacques, J. Leta, A comparison between domestic and international publications in Brazilian psychiatry. Scientometrics, 56(3) (2003) 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Leta, J. C. R. Pereira, H. Chaimovich, The life sciences — the relative contribution of the University of Sao Paulo to the highest impact factor journals and to those with the largest number of articles, 1980 to 1999. Scientometrics, 63(3) (2005) 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. S. Melo, L. M. Bini, P. Carvalho, Brazilian articles in international journals on Limnology. Scientometrics, 67(2) (May 2006) 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Chen, L. Carr, Trailblazing the literature of hypertext: Author co-citation analysis (1989–1998). In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext, pp. 51–60, 1999.

  9. A. E. Hassan, R. C. Holt, The small world of software reverse engineering. In: Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pp. 278–283, 2004.

  10. D. B. Horn, T. A. Finholt, J. P. Birnholtz, D. Motwani, S. Jayaraman, Six degrees of Jonathan Grudin: a social network analysis of the evolution and impact of CSCW research. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 582–591, 2004.

  11. M. A. Nascimento, J. Sander, J. Pound. Analysis of SIGMOD’s co-authorship graph. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32(3) (2003) 8–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Elmacioglu, D. Lee, On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(2) (2005) 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The PLoS medicine editors. The impact factor game: It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Medicine, 3(6) (2006) e291, doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Rossner, H. Epps, E. Hill, Show me the data. The Journal of Cell Biology, 179(6) (2007) 1091–1092, doi:10.1083/jcb.200711140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. A. Goodrum, K. W. Mccain, S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, Scholarly publishing in the internet age: A citation analysis of computer science literature. Information Processing & Management, 37(5) (2001) 661–675.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. L. I. Meho, K. Yang, A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. arXiv:cs/0612132vl, 2006. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0612132vl.

  17. J. Bar-Ilan, M. Leveneb, A. Lin, Some measures for comparing citation databases. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1) (2007) 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Jacso, Comparison and analysis of the citedness scores in Web of Science and Google Scholar. In: Proceeding of Digital Libraries: Implementing Strategies and Sharing Experiences, number 3815 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 360–369, 2005.

  19. Y. B. Park, D. Ross, R. R. Sabot, Educational Expansion and the Inequality of Pay in Brazil and Korea. Center for Development Economics, Williams College, 1995.

  20. E. B. Viotti, National learning systems — a new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(7) (2002) 653–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. UNESCO Science Report 2005. http://www.unesco.org/science/psd/publications/science_report2005.shtml, 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Wainer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wainer, J., Xavier, E.C. & Bezerra, F. Scientific production in Computer Science: A comparative study of Brazil and other countries. Scientometrics 81, 535–547 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2156-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2156-y

Keywords

Navigation