Skip to main content
Log in

How much the shared ocean or lake basins connect the researchers in neighbouring countries?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper evaluates the importance of jointly conducted research versus national, when neighbouring countries are trying to study a topic of their mutual interest. The chosen topic was the shared ocean or lake basin. The number of non-mutual and mutual articles in the period 1999–2008 for seven pairs of neighbouring countries was analysed by extracting published articles and citations from the Web of Science database. It was found that mutual articles have generally better visibility than the non-mutual articles, valid even for large and developed countries. Also, the percentage of self-citations in the mutual articles is much lower than in the non-mutual ones. However, the citations of the non-mutual articles are influenced by the development of the country or, in some cases, by the development of the countries in which researchers from a certain country are presently working (this applies strongly to the Eastern Europe countries).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration, (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52, 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60, 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouabib, H., & Martin, B. R. (2009). Evaluation of Moroccan research using a bibliometric-based approach: Investigation of the validity of the h-index. Scientometrics, 78, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fillipo, D., Morillo, F., & Fernandez, M. T. (2008). Indicators of scientific collaboration between CSIC and Latin America through international databases. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 33(1), 66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigel’man, M. (2007). Save Russian science. Nature Physics, 3, 138–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, R. E., & Aronson, J. K. (2005). National differences in publishing papers on adverse drug reactions. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 59, 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51, 69–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H.-J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 45, 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsouyanni, K. (2008). Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential. Environmental Health, 7, 3. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-7-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaić, Z. B., & Klaić, B. (2004). Croatian scientific publications in top journals according to the Science Citation Index for the 1980–2000 period. Scientometrics, 61, 221–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., & Chaimovich, H. (2002). Recognition and international collaboration: The Brasilian case. Scientometrics, 53, 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmeda-Gómez, C., Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Ovalle-Perandones, A., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Anegón, F. D. (2009). Visualization of scientific co-authorship in Spanish universities. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61(1), 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prpić, K. (2007). Changes of scientific knowledge production and research productivity in a transitional society. Scientometrics, 72, 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel, J. M. (1998). Publishing patterns of Mexican scientists: Differences between national and international papers. Scientometrics, 41, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Schubert, M. (2009). Outperform your neighbours. Scientometrics, 80, 555–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980–1989). Journal of Information Science, 24, 432–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications, Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-2126-z.

  • Vinkler, P. (2008). Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries. Scientometrics, 74, 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support for this research is given by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia (grant 001-0013077-1122).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivica Vilibić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vilibić, I. How much the shared ocean or lake basins connect the researchers in neighbouring countries?. Scientometrics 83, 463–470 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0010-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0010-5

Keywords

Navigation