Skip to main content
Log in

Are Iranian scientists recognized as their productivity enhances? A comparison of Iran’s impact to global norms in different subfields of Science Citation Index during 2002–2005

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Witnessing a substantial growth rate in its scientific production, Iran is considered as one of the recently rising stars in scientific contribution scene. However, its impact in science progress is widely unknown, especially at global level. Studying Iran’s scholarly publications and recognition in SCI, the present communication tries to clarify the country’s science system performance using regression analyses and then to compare its performance to that of the world, using Relative Citation Rate (RCR) and Relative Subfield Citedness (RW). The results of the regression analyses reveal that although Iran displays considerable weaknesses in its performance, it is increasingly recognized as its outputs grow. According to the RCR values, Iran performed at/above the global level in 21 subfields. However, the RW values show that the country’s performance is above the global level in only two subfields. Although Iran is very far from an ideal situation; these evidences can be considered as heralds of a successful movement towards a wealthy scientific future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.in-cites.com/countries/iran2006.html.

  2. http://www.in-cites.com/countries/iran2006.html.

  3. http://www.in-cites.com/countries/index.html.

  4. As the JCR provides no data at subfield level for year 2002, immediacy indexes of the related journals were used to calculate the citations from 2002 to papers published in year 2002. The numbers of citations to these papers in each year from 2003–2007 were extracted from JCR 2003–2007.

References

  • Bhattacharjee, Y. (2004). Scientific Publishing: Suit seeks to ease trade embargo rules. Science, 306(5693), 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, G. (2004). Publishers split over response to US trade embargo ruling. Nature, 24, 663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davari Ardakani, R. (2007, August 12). The illusion of development by increasing the amount of papers in ISI. Iran [in Persian]. Retrieved July 26, 2008, from http://www.iraninstitute.com/1386/860521/html/think.htm.

  • Gaffney, O. (2003). IEEE under fire for withdrawing Iranian members’ benefits. Science, 301(5640), 1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H.-J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of The European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayati, Z., & Ebrahimi, S. (2008). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80(3). doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2094-3.

  • Jokar, A., & Ebrahimi, S. (2007). Nations tendency towards citing Iranian scientific outputs. Majjale-ye Ketabdari va Ettela’ Resani (The journal of library and information Science; in Persian), 10 (4), Retrieved July 8, 2008, from http://www.aqlibrary.ir./Issue/ShowOneArticle.aspx?Articlecode=478.

  • Katz, J. S. (1999a). The self similar science system. Research Policy, 28, 501–517. Retrieved July 3, 2004, from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/jskatz.

  • Katz, J. S. (1999b). Bibliometric indicators and the social sciences, prepared for the ESRC. Retrieved July 3, 2004, from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/jskatz.

  • Katz, J. S. (2000). Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 23–36. Retrieved July 3, 2004, from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/jskatz.

  • Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1995, June 7–10). The classification of interdisciplinary journals: A new approach. In: Proceeding of the fifth biennial conference of the international society for scientometrics and informatics, Rosary College, River Forest, IL, USA. Retrieved September 5, 2004, from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/pubs/ClassInterdiscJournals.pdf.

  • Khosrokhavar, F. (2004). Report on science in post-revolutionary Iran—Part I, emergence of a scientific community? Critical Middle Eastern Studies, 13, 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingman, S. (2004). Scientific publishers divided over US trade embargo ruling. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(4), 312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, R. (2000). Iranian science: Iran’s scientists cautiously reach out to the world. Science, 290(5496), 1484–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrdad, M., Heydari, A., Sarbolouki, M. N., & Etemad, S. (2004). The basic science in Islamic Republic of Iran. Scientometrics, 61(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moin, M., Mahmoudi, M., & Rezaei, N. (2005). Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 62(2), 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosavi, F. (2003). The study of the possibility of ascending of Iran to top ten science producing countries of the world. Rahyaft [in Persian], 30, 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norouzi, A. (2007, September 18). The latest reports of ESI on Iran’s scientific productivity and ranking. Retrieved July 25, 2008, from http://www5.irandoc.ac.ir/irandoc/news.aspx?id=267.

  • Osareh, F., & Wilson, C. S. (2000). A comparison of Iranian scientific publications in the Science Citation Index: 1985–1989 and 1990–1994. Scientometrics, 48(3), 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osareh, F., & Wilson, C. S. (2002). Collaboration in Iranian scientific publications. Libri, 52, 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahni, D. N. (2003). Economic sanctions go too far. Chemical & Engineering News, 81(50), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9, 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1983). Relative citation rate: A new indicator for measuring the impact of publication. In D. Tomov & L. Dimitrova (Eds.), Proceedings of the first national conference with international participation on scientometrics and linguistics of scientific text (pp. 80–81), Varna.

  • Science Watch. (2003). Middle Eastern Nations making their mark. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.sciencewatch.com/nov-dec2003/sw_nov-dec2003_page1.htm.

  • Sotudeh, H., Changiz, F., & Hashemnia N. (2008, March 5–6). Iranian scientists’ approach to publishing in and referencing to Open Access journals. In Presented at the first conference on medical scientometrics, Isfahan Medical University, Isfahan, Iran.

  • Vinkler, P. (1986). Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics, 10, 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (2002). Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (impact) factors in practice. Scientometrics, 53, 237–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalpani, M., & Heydari, A (2006). A critical study of research status in Iran: the case of scientific profiles of 10 highly productive Iranian chemists. Korsi News 2006 [in Persian] Retrieved July 26, 2008, from http://www.korsi.ir/Statics/DR.%20HEIDARI%20ARTICLE.doc.

  • Yalpani, M., Heydari, A., & Mehrdad, M. (2005). Application of scientometric methods to chemical research in Iran: Reflections on Iran’s current science policy. Scientometrics, 63(3), 531–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hajar Sotudeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sotudeh, H. Are Iranian scientists recognized as their productivity enhances? A comparison of Iran’s impact to global norms in different subfields of Science Citation Index during 2002–2005. Scientometrics 83, 39–54 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0018-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0018-x

Keywords

Navigation