Abstract
A large part of Social Sciences and the Humanities do not adapt to international proceedings used in English for scientific output on databases such as the Web of Science and Scopus. The aim of this paper is to show the different results obtained in scientific work by comparing Social Sciences researchers with those of other sciences in four Spanish universities. The first finding is that some Social Sciences researchers are somewhat internationalised. However, the majority of individuals who are prestigious in their local academic-scientific community do not even appear on the information sources mentioned above.
Access this article
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Academic Ranking of World Universities. (2008). Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Retrieved May 20, 2008, from http://www.arwu.org.
Aguado-López, E., & Rogel-Salazar, R. (2006). Redalyc: red de revistas científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal: un balance a tres años de camino. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Consejo Latinoamericano en Ciencias Sociales: Fraga Jorge CLACSO, pp. 209–233. Available in http://www.clacso.org.ar/biblioteca.
Bauer, K., & Bakkalbasi, N. (2005). An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). Retrieved November 14, 2007, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html .
Bonilla, M., & Pérez-Angon, M. A. (1999). Revistas Mexicanas de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica. Interciencia, 24, 102–106.
Bosman, J., Van Mourik, I., Rasch, M., Sieverts, E., & Verhoeff, H. (2006, June). Scopus reviewed and compared. Utrecht University Library.
Buela-Casal, G., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., & López, W. (2003). Iberindex: Índice Iberoamericano de evaluación de publicaciones científicas. Infocop, 84, 41–44.
Collazo-Reyes, F., Luna-Morales, M. E., Russell, J. M., & Pérez-Angón, M. A. (2008). Publication and citation patterns of Latin American & Caribbean journals in the SCI and SSCI from 1995 to 2004. Scientometrics, 75(1), 145–161.
Cronin, B., Snyder, H., & Atkins, H. (1997). Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology. Journal of Documentation, 53(3), 263–273.
De Moya, F. (2007). Indicadores Bibliométricos de la Actividad Científica Española (1990–2004). FECYT. Retrieved November 29, 2007, from http://sise.fecyt.es.
Echeverría, J., Maltrás, B., & Sequera, R. (2006). La investigación en humanidades: Problemas específicos. In J. Sebastián & E. Muñoz (Eds.), Radiografía de la investigación pública en España (pp. 303–325). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing. Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.
Gibbs, W. W. (1995). Lost science in the Third World. Scientific American, 273, 76–83.
Gómez, I., Sancho, R., Bordons, M., & Fernández, M. T. (2006). La I + D en España a través de publicaciones y patentes. In J. Sebastián & E. Muñoz (Eds.), Radiografía de la investigación pública en España (pp. 275–302). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Google Scholar. (2008). Retrieved May 16, 2008, from http://scholar.google.com/scholar/about.html.
Harzing, A. W. (2008). Google Scholar—a new data source for citation analysis. Retrieved April 2, 2008, from http://www.harzing.com/pop_gs.htm.
Hernández, J. (2006). La Universidad española en cifras, Informe 2006. Available in http://www.crue.org/pdf/CRUE%202006.
IN-RECS, Índice de impacto, Revistas Españolas de Ciencias Sociales. http://ec3.ugr.es/in-recs.
Jacso, P. (2005). As we search—comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9), 1537–1547.
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273–294.
Leydesdorff, L., & Bihui, J. (2005). Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in terms of aggregated journal–journal citation relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 1469–1479.
Macroberts, M. H., & Macroberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435–444.
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.
Meneghini, R., & Packer, A. (2007). Is there science beyond English? EMBO Reports, 8, 112–116.
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. New York: Springer.
Osca-Lluch, J., Blesa, P., Barrueco, J. M., Velasco, E., & Krichel, T. (2008). Some aspects of citation indexes in Spain: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 75(2), 313–318.
Payne, D. (2004). Google Scholar welcomed. News from The Scientist, 5(1):20041123-01. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://www.the-scientist.com/news/20041123/01/.
QS World University Rankings. (2008). QS quacquarelli symonds. Retrieved May 16, 2008, from http://www.topuniversities.com.
Reed Elsevier. (2004). Scopus comes of age. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://www.reed-elsevier.com/index.cfm?Articleid=1075.
SCOPUS. http://www.info.scopus.com.
UPV/EHU. http://www.ehu.es.
Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. (2008). Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). Retrieved May 16, 2008, from http://www.webometrics.info.
Xin-Ning, S., Xin-Ming, H., & Xin-Ning, H. (2001). Developing the Chinese social science citation index. Online Information Review, 25, 365–369.
Acknowledgements
Well-chosen comments on an earlier draft from two anonymous referees are gratefully appreciated. We are most grateful to Carmen Acebal, Research Vice-Rector of the Universidad Complutense, and to Manu Barandiaran, Iñaki Lasagabaster, Jon Barrutia, Pedro Ibarra, Juan Carlos Miguel, Alex Arizkun and Jon Arluzea, professors and researchers, for helpful information on the academic and research practices in different scientific areas and disciplines. The authors would particularly wish to thank Carmen Pérez (CSIC) and Nekane Zaldua (UPV/EHU) for their assistance with data collection. Lastly, we would like to give special thanks to our translator, Patricia O’Connor, for her excellent work translating, revising and correcting this article and previous ones.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Etxebarria, G., Gomez-Uranga, M. Use of Scopus and Google Scholar to measure social sciences production in four major Spanish universities. Scientometrics 82, 333–349 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0043-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0043-9