Skip to main content
Log in

Everything about genes: Some results on the dynamics of genomics research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study some novel indicators and publication data resources are explored to study the dynamics of genomics research at three different levels: worldwide; national and at individual Research Centers. Our results indicate that the growth of genomics research worldwide seems to be stabilizing, whereas genomics research in the Netherlands aims at getting ‘ready for the next step’. As we find differences in research dynamics at the level of individual Research Centers, governmental support in a ‘next step’ could take these differences into account. For this purpose, we introduce a general model of research dynamics and timing of research management, building on ideas of Price and Bonaccorsi. Based on this model a framework is presented to discuss steering options in relation to research dynamics. We apply this framework to Research Centers of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI) and discuss findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archambault, E., Betrand F., Côté G. (2003), Benchmarking of Canadian genomics — 1991–2002, Report prepared for Genome Canada, September 2003.

  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2005a), Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science. Paper presented to the PRIME General Assembly, Manchester, January 7–9, 2005. Draft version (pp. 38), December 2004.

  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2005b), Better institutions vs better policies in European Science. Paper presented at the PRIME General Assembly, Manchester, January 7–9, 2005. Draft version (pp. 40), January 2005.

  • Google (2006), Advanced Scholar Search. Used November 2006 at: http://www.google.com

  • Jacsó, P. (2005), As we may search — Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9): 1537–1547, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederberg, J., McGray, A. (2001), ’Ome sweet ‘omics — A genealogical treasury of words, The Scientist, 15(7): 8, 2 April 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGI (2006), Strategic Plan 2008–2012. National Genomics Initiative NGI-website: www.genomics.nl Also: Genomics Momentum 2006. Retrieved November 2006 from: www.gm2006.org

  • Pauly, D., Stergiou, K. (2005), Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI’s Citation Index and Google’s Scholar service. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, ESEP, Dec. 22, 2005, 33–35.

  • Solla Price, D. De (1961), Science since Babylon, Paperbound edition 1962. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solla Price, D. De (1963), Little Science, Big Science, Paperback edition 1965. New York and London: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T., Nederhof, A. (2006), Bibliometric Study on Genomics Research in the Netherlands 1996–2004, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University.

  • Whitley, R. (2000), The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Enlarged second edition; reprinted 2006; first edition 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Braam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braam, R. Everything about genes: Some results on the dynamics of genomics research. Scientometrics 79, 61–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0404-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0404-4

Keywords

Navigation