Abstract
This paper reports on a bibliometric study of the characteristics and impact of research in the library and information science (LIS) field which was funded through research grant programs, and compares it with research that received no extra funding. Seven core LIS journals were examined to identify articles published in 1998 that acknowledge research grant funding. The distribution of these articles by various criteria (e.g., topic, affiliation, funding agency) was determined. Their impact as indicated by citation counts during 1998–2008 was evaluated against that of articles without acknowledging extra funding and published in the same journals in the same year using citation data collected from Scopus’ Citation Tracker. The impact of grant-funded research as measured by citation counts was substantially higher than that of other research, both overall and in each journal individually. Scholars from outside LIS core institutions contributed heavily to grant-funded research. The two highest-impact publications by far reported non-grant-based research, and grant-based funding of research reported in core LIS journals was biased towards the information retrieval (IR) area, particularly towards research on IR systems. The percentage of articles reporting grant-funded research was substantially higher in information-oriented journals than in library-focused ones.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avkiran, N. K. (1997). Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research. Scientometrics, 39(2), 173–184.
Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & van den Besselaar, P. (2010). A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications. Journal of Informetrics. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.004.
Bourke, P., & Butler, L. (1999). The efficacy of different modes of funding research: Perspectives from Australian data on the biological sciences. Research Policy, 28, 489–499.
Garfield, E. (1986). Which medical journals have the greatest impact? Annuals of Internal Medicine, 105, 313–320.
Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.
Heinze, T. (2008). How to sponsor ground-breaking research: A comparison of funding schemes. Science and Public Policy, 35(5), 302–318.
Herbertz, H. (1995). Does it pay to cooperate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology. Scientometrics, 33(1), 117–122.
Joerges, B., & Shinn, T. (2002). Instrumentation between science, state and industry. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Laudel, G. (2006). The art of getting funded: how scientists adapt to their funding conditions. Science and Public Policy, 33(7), 489–504.
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Macro-level indicators of the relation between research funding and research output. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 353–362.
Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21, 311–323.
Nisonger, T. E., & Davis, C. H. (2005). The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the Kohl-Davis study. College and Research Libraries, July 2005, 341–377.
Persson, O., Glanzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60, 421–432.
Prpić, K. (2007). Changes of scientific knowledge production and research productivity in a transitional society. Scientometrics, 72(3), 487–511.
Rousseau, R. (1992). Why am I not cited or why are multiauthored papers more cited than others. Journal of Documentation, 48(1), 19–80.
Scharnhorst, A. (1998). Citation—networks, science landscapes and evolutionary strategies. Scientometrics, 43(1), 95–106.
Smart, J. C., & Bayer, A. E. (1986). Author collaboration and impact: A note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles. Scientometrics, 10(5–6), 297–305.
van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070–2086.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Andreas Strotmann for his many helpful insights, and Kelly Kirkpatrick for her assistance in collecting data on articles reporting funded research. The author is very grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions for improvements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, D. Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: a case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics 84, 293–306 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0191-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0191-y