Skip to main content
Log in

Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: a wide-scale study

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the effect on journal impact factors (JIF) of citations from documents labeled as articles and reviews (usually peer reviewed) versus citations coming from other documents. In addition, we studied the effect on JIF of the number of citing records. This number is usually different from the number of citations. We selected a set of 700 journals indexed in the SCI section of JCR that receive a low number of citations. The reason for this choice is that in these instances some citations may have a greater impact on the JIF than in more highly-cited journals. After excluding some journals for different reasons, our sample consisted of 674 journals. We obtained data on citations that contributed to the JIF for the years 1998–2006. In general, we found that most journals obtained citations that contribute to the impact factor from documents labeled as articles and reviews. In addition, in most of journals the ratio between citations that contributed to the impact factor and citing records was greater than 80% in all years. Thus, in general, we did not find evidence that citations that contributed to the impact factor were dependent on non-peer reviewed documents or only a few citing records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade, A., González-Jonte, R., & Campanario, J. M. (2009). Journals that increase their impact factor at least fourfold in a few years: The role of journal self-citations. Scientometrics, 80(2), 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, E., & Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79, 635–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanario, J. M., & Gonzalez, L. (2006). Journal self-citations that contribute to the impact factor: Documents labeled “editorial material” in journals covered by the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 69, 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanario, J. M., Gonzalez, L., & Rodriguez, C. (2006). Structure of the impact factor of academic journals in the field of Education and Educational Psychology: Citations from editorial board members. Scientometrics, 69, 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanario, J. M., & Molina, A. (2009). Surviving bad times: The role of citations, self-citations and numbers of citable items in recovery of the journal impact factor after at least four years of continuous decreases. Scientometrics, 81(3), 859–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, F. H., Ingwersen, P., & Wormell, I. (1997). Online determination of the journal impact factor and its international properties. Scientometrics, 40, 529–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53, 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golubic, R., Rudes, M., Kovacic, N., Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2008). Calculating impact factor: How bibliographical classification of journal items affects the impact factor of large and small journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, L., & Campanario, J. M. (2007). Structure of the impact factor of journals included in the Social Sciences Citation Index: Citations from documents labeled “editorial material”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 252–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossner, M., van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2007). Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology, 179, 1091–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossner, M., van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Irreproducible results: a response to Thomson Scientific. Journal of Cell Biology, 180, 254–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (Dirección General de Investigación) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER, project SEJ2007-66236/SOCI). We thank K. Shashok for improving the use of English in the manuscript and for suggestions about the content. We also thank an anonymous referee for suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Miguel Campanario.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campanario, J.M., Carretero, J., Marangon, V. et al. Effect on the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: a wide-scale study. Scientometrics 87, 75–84 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0333-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0333-2

Keywords

Navigation