Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Network of the core: mapping and visualizing the core of scientific domains

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we propose mapping and visualizing the core of scientific domains using social network analysis techniques derived from mathematical graph theory. In particular, the concept of Network of the Core is introduced which can be employed to visualize scientific domains by constructing a network among theoretical constructs, models, and concepts. A Network of the Core can be used to reveal hidden properties and structures of a research domain such as connectedness, centrality, density, structural equivalence, and cohesion, by modeling the casual relationship among theoretical constructs. Network of the Core concept can be used to explore the strengths and limitations of a research domain, and graphically and mathematically derive the number research hypotheses. The Network of the Core approach can be applied to any domain given that the investigator has a deep understanding of the area under consideration, a graphical or conceptual view (in the form of a network of association among the theoretical constructs and concepts) of the scientific domain can be obtained, and an underlying theory is available or can be constructed to support Network of the Core formation. Future research directions and several other issues related to the Network of the Core concept are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, D. (1979). The social framework of the information society. In M. L. Dertouzos & J. Moses (Eds.), The computer age: A twenty-year view (pp. 163–211). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, N., Lloyd, E., & Wilson, R. (1986). Graph theory 1736–1936. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, E. (2009). Differentiating, describing, and visualizing scientific space: A novel approach to the analysis of published scientific abstracts. Scientometrics, 80(2), 385–406. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2070-3.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, L. A. (1989). The methodology of economic model building. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110(2), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2003). Visualizing scientific paradigms: An introduction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 392–393. doi:10.1002/asi.10224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Paul, R. J., & O’Keefe, B. (2001). Fitting the jigsaw of citation: Information visualization in domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(4), 315–330. doi:10.1002/1532-2890(2000)9999:9999<:aid-asi1074>3.0.co;2-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, S., & Riggins, F. J. (2005). The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(12), 298–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I., & Istomin, V. S. (2003). Why do we need algorithmic historiography? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 400–412. doi:10.1002/asi.10226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R. (1988). Computer-assisted theory building: Modeling dynamic social systems. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189–202. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., & De Moor, B. (2008). A hybrid mapping of information science. Scientometrics, 75(3), 607–631. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2002-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, S., & Kim, Y. (2010). Measuring relatedness between technological fields. Scientometrics, 83(2), 435–454. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0108-9.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, G. F., Moon, J., & Park, H. W. (2010). Electronic government research: Graphical-mathematical modeling. Paper presented at the 3rd conference on innovation and development, “learning from development experience”, Seoul National University, Korea.

  • Khan, G. F., Moon, J., & Park, H. W. (2011). Mapping and visualizing the core of scientific domains: Information system research. Paper presented at the COLLNET 2011, seventh international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics (WIS), Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey. http://www.collnet.cs.bilgi.edu.tr/program/programme/.

  • Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Park, H. W., Swar, B., & Rho, J. (2011b). A socio-technical perspective on e-government issues in developing countries: A scientometrics approach. Scientometrics, 87(2), 267–286. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0322-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully function e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(1), 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B., & Jeong, Y.-I. (2008). Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3–19. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1819-4.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5–25. doi:10.1007/bf02458391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2001). The challenge of scientometrics the development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Parkland, FL: Universal-Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Top-down decomposition of the journal citation report of the social science citation index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches. Scientometrics, 60(2), 159–180. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027678.31097.e0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303–1319. doi:10.1002/asi.20614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H., & Feng, Y. (2009). A measure of authors’ centrality in co-authorship networks based on the distribution of collaborative relationships. Scientometrics, 81(2), 499–511. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2173-x.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpaul, P. (2002). Visualizing cooperation networks of elite institutions in India. Scientometrics, 54(2), 213–228. doi:10.1023/a:1016036711279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2001a). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Paper presented at the national academy of sciences of the USA.

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131.

  • Newman, M. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167–256.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008. Florida: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. http://www.cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.

  • Park, H. W. (2010). Mapping the e-science landscape in South Korea using the webometrics method. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 211–229. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01517.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3–27. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0257-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Korean journals in the science citation index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S & T in Korea? Scientometrics, 75(3), 439–462. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1862-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals. Scientometrics, 81(1), 157–175. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2119-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (1962). Toward a general theory of action. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perianes-Rodríguez, A., Olmeda-Gómez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). Detecting, identifying and visualizing research groups in co-authorship networks. Scientometrics, 82(2), 307–319. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0040-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. d. S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. d. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5–6), 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saebo, O., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423. (623–656).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Su, H.-N., & Lee, P.-C. (2010). Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in technology foresight. Scientometrics, 85(1), 65–79. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swar, B. (2011). Three essays on IT outsourcing relationship management: An assessment from public sector perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, KAIST, Daejeon.

  • Swar, B., Moon, J., Oh, J., & Rhee, C. (2010). Determinants of relationship quality for IS/IT outsourcing success in public sector. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10796-010-9292-7.

  • Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1–116. doi:10.2200/S00176ED1V01Y200903ICR004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J.-C., Chiang, C.-h., & Lin, S.-W. (2010). Network structure of innovation: can brokerage or closure predict patent quality? Scientometrics, 84(3), 735–748. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0211-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. (1995). Theories of the information society. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, L., Olds, T., & Williams, M. (2010). Evidence base, quantitation and collaboration: three novel indices for bibliometric content analysis. Scientometrics, 85(1), 317–328. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0163-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, R., & Wang, J. (2011). Visualizing the research on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. Scientometrics, 86(3), 593–612. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0283-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Mapping knowledge domains of Chinese digital library research output, 1994–2010. Scientometrics, 1–37. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0428-4.

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge partial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2010-330-B00232). An early version of this article is accepted for presentation at COLLNET 2011, the Seventh International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics, and Scientometrics (WIS), 20-23 September, 2011, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Media & Communication, Yeungnam University, 214-1, Dae-dong, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 712-749, South Korea

    Gohar Feroz Khan & Han Woo Park

  2. College of Agriculture and Life Science, Program in Regional Information, Seoul National University, Sil-Lim Dong, San 4-2, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Junghoon Moon

Authors
  1. Gohar Feroz Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junghoon Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Han Woo Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gohar Feroz Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, G.F., Moon, J. & Park, H.W. Network of the core: mapping and visualizing the core of scientific domains. Scientometrics 89, 759–779 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0489-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0489-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation