Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The relationship between co-authorship, currency of references and author self-citations

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to identify the relationship between co-authorship and the currency of the references and author self-citations in the key journals of environmental engineering. The results show that the self-citation rate of co-authored articles is higher than in single-authored articles. A statistically significant correlation is identified between the numbers of co-authors, the rate of author self-citing and the author self-cited; though it was a low correlation. The value of coefficient correlation between the number of co-authors and the author self-citing rate is slightly higher than that between the number of co-authors and the author self-cited rate, which indicates that the number of co-authors hold a stronger correlation with the self-citing rate than the self-cited rate. Meanwhile, self-citing references are found to be more up-to-date than references to others. The range of publication years of self-citing references is smaller than that of references to others, indicating that researchers tend to preferentially cite their own recent works. There is no significant difference in the latest references between self-citing references and the references to others. It might result from electronic journals that provide an easy access to the most current publications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self citation. Scientometrics, 56(2), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qallaf, C. L. (2003). Citation patterns in the Kuwaiti Journal Medical Principles and Practice: The first 12 years, 1989–2000. Scientometrics, 56(3), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. (2003). Citing self. Science, 300(5616), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran, N. K. (1997). Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research. Scientometrics, 39(2), 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, M., Borrego, A., Vilaginés, A., Ollé, C., & Somoza, M. (2008). A bibliometric study of psychological research on tourism. Scientometrics, 77(3), 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonzi, S., & Snyder, H. W. (1990). Patterns of self citation across fields of Inquiry. The 53 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science (pp. 204–207). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonzi, S., & Snyder, H. W. (1991). Motivations of citation: a comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics, 21(2), 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gami, A. S., Montori, V. M., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2004). Author self-citation in the diabetes literature. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170(13), 1925–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Philadelphia: ISI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2008). Seven myths in bibliometrics. About facts and fiction in quantitative science studies. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Ninth COLLNET Meeting. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/GlanzelWIS2008smb.pdf.

  • Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics, 61(3), 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., & Schlemmer, B. (2004). A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics, 59(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellsten, I., Lambiotte, R., Scharnhorst, A., & Ausloos, M. (2007). Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists’ field mobility? Scientometrics, 72(3), 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbertz, H. (1995). Does it pay to cooperate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology. Scientometrics, 33(1), 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2003). Self-citation and self-reference: credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(3), 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M. (1980). Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: a bibliometric study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Michigan University, Ann Arbor, MI.

  • Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5), 438–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation (Vol. 9). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, B. (2009). Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? A bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1986). National trends in physics and technology. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 36(1), 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendlebury, D. (2009). The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators. Archivum Immunologiae et therapiae Experimentalis, 57(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, T. J. (1999). A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics, 45(1), 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichappan, P., & Sarasvady, S. (2002). The other side of the coin: the intricacies of author self citations. Scientometrics, 54(2), 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (2001). Are multi-authored articles cited more than single-authored ones? Are collaborations with authors from other countries more cited than collaborations within the country? A case study. In F. Havemann, R. Wagner-Döbler, & H. Kretschmer (Eds.), Proceedings of the second Berlin workshop on scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 173–176). Berlin: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). The weight of author self-citations. A fractional approach to self-citation counting. Scientometrics, 67(3), 503–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C., & Bayer, A. E. (1986). Author collaboration and impact: A note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles. Scientometrics, 10(5–6), 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. W., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980–1989). Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagliacozzo, R. (1977). Self-citations in scientific literature. Journal of Documentation, 33(4), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Houston—Cullen College of Engineering. (2006). In Memoriam: Frank M. Tiller (1917–2006). Retrieved March 26, 2009, from http://www.egr.uh.edu/parameters/spring2006/?e=tiller.

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results—some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Library Science, Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Wen-Yau Cathy Lin

  2. Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Roosevelt Road Sec. 4, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan

    Mu-Hsuan Huang

Authors
  1. Wen-Yau Cathy Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mu-Hsuan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mu-Hsuan Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, WY.C., Huang, MH. The relationship between co-authorship, currency of references and author self-citations. Scientometrics 90, 343–360 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0523-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0523-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation