Abstract
This article analyses scientific growth time series using data for Spanish doctoral theses from 1848 to 2009, retrieved from national databases and an in-depth archive search. Data are classified into subseries by historical periods. The analytical techniques employed range from visual analysis of deterministic graphs to curve-fitting with exponential smoothing and AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average models. Forecasts are made using the best model. The main finding is that Spanish output of doctoral theses appears to fit a quasi-logistic growth model in line with Price’s predictions. An additional control variable termed year-on-year General Welfare is shown to modulate scientific growth, especially in the historical period from 1899 to 1939.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Two features characterise Spanish theses during the Ancien Regime; they had to be written in Latin and be approved (nihil obstat: ‘nothing hinders’) by the all-powerful Court of Inquisition; it was, moreover, an expensive, ceremonial and ostentatious ritual in which the newly-created doctor was forced to spend huge amounts of money on banquets, speeches, civic and religious processions and ruinous displays of generosity culminating in a bullfight.
In 1877, Santiago Ramón y Cajal, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1906, submitted his thesis: Patogenia de la inflamación—Inflammation pathogeny.
The Junta de Ampliación de Estudios (Scientific Studies and Research Expansion Board) was a body founded in 1907 with the aim of promoting scientific research and education in Spain, in an attempt to emulate European models. Its influence, in terms of arranging exchanges with Europe and sending scientists to Latin America, was notable. The institution was modified in 1939 with the advent of General Franco’s regime.
In 1934, Severo Ochoa de Albornoz, the Spanish-born scientist and naturalised citizen of the USA, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1959, submitted his thesis: Los fenómenos químicos y energéticos de la contracción muscular en la insuficiencia adrenal experimental (Chemical and energetic phenomena of muscle contraction in experimental adrenal failure).
References
Abdi, H. (2007). Kendall rank correlation. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Andersen, J. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2011). Price revisited: On the growth of dissertations in eight research fields. Scientometrics, 88(2), 371–383. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0408-8.
Ben-David, J. (1991). Scientific growth: Essays on the social organization and ethos of science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2006). Advanced indicators of productivity of universities. An application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics, 66(2), 389–410. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0028-x.
Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1970). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., & Reinsel, G. C. (1994). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Box, G. E. P., & Pierce, D. A. (1970). Distribution of the autocorrelations in AutoRegressive Moving Average time series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(332), 1509–1526.
Braun, T., & Schubert, A. (1988). World flash on basic research: Scientometrics versus socio-economic indicators. Scatter plots for 51 countries. 1970–1980. Scientometrics, 13(1), 1–9.
Casson, R. J., & Al-Qureshi, S. H. (2010). Scientific information, journal impact factors and editorial policy. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 38(7), 655–656.
Celeste, R. K., Bastos, J. L., & Faerstein, E. (2011). Trends in the investigation of social determinants of health: Selected themes and methods. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 27(1), 183–189.
Chang, Y-F., Ku, Y-W., & Hsu, C-Y. (2010). Social policy study in Taiwan. An analysis of postgraduate degree theses, 1990–2008. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 20(1), 95–110.
Chen, Y. C., Yeh, H. Y., Wu, J. C., Haschler, I., Chen, T. J., & Wetter, T. (2011). Taiwan’s National Health Insurance research database: Administrative health care database as study object in bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 86(2), 365–380. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0289-2.
de Solla Price, D. J. (1978). Towards a model of science indicators. In Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R. K. Merton, A. Thackray, & H. Zuckerman (Eds.), The advent of science indicators (pp. 69–95). New York: Wiley.
de Solla Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science…and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
Falkenheim, J. C., & Fiegener, M. K. (2008). 2007 Records fifth consecutive annual increase in U.S. doctoral awards. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Fernández-Cano, A., & Bueno, A. (1999). Synthesizing scientometric patterns in Spanish educational research. Scientometrics, 46(2), 349–367. doi:10.1007/BF02464783.
Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., & Vallejo, M. (2004). Reconsidering Price’s model of scientific growth: An overview. Scientometrics, 61(3), 301–321. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045112.11562.11.
Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., & Vallejo, M. (2008). Revisión y prospectiva de la producción española en tesis doctorales de Pedagogía (1976–2006) [Review and prospective of the Spanish production of doctoral theses in Pedagogy (1976–2006)]. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 26(1), 191–207.
Guan, J. C., & Chen, K. H. (2010). Modeling macro-R&D production frontier performance: An application to Chinese province-level R&D. Scientometrics, 82(1), 165–173. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0030-1.
Han, C. S., Lee, S. K., & England, M. (2010). Transition to postmodern science-related scientometric data. Scientometrics, 84(2), 391–401. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0119-6.
Huang, C., Varum, C. A., & Gouveia, J. B. (2006). Scientific productivity paradox: The case of China’s S&T system. Scientometrics, 69(2), 449–473. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0153-6.
Lakatos, I., & Musgrove, A. (Eds.). (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lariviere, V., Zuccala, A., & Archambault, E. (2008). The declining scientific impact of theses: Implications for electronic thesis and dissertation repositories and graduate studies. Scientometrics, 74(1), 109–121. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0106-3.
Leitner, J.-R., & Leoplod-Wilburger, U. (2011). Experiments on forecasting behavior with several sources of information. A review of literature. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(3), 459–469. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.006.
Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617–630. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0231-1.
Liang, L. M., Liu, J. W., & Rousseau, R. (2004). Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities. Scientometrics, 61(1), 3–18. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037359.22151.6f.
Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. P. (1978). On a measure of a lack of fit in time series models. Biométrica, 65(2), 297–303. doi:10.1093/biomet/65.2.29.
Makridakis, S., & Hibon, M. (2000). The M3-competition: Results, conclusions and implications. International Journal of Forecasting, 16(4), 451–476. doi:10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00057-1.
Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S. C., & Hyndman, R. J. (1998). Forecasting. Methods and applications. New York: Wiley.
Microsoft Inc. (2010). Microsoft Excel 2007 version 12. Seattle: Microsoft Inc. Available at http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/
Ministerio de Educación. (2011). Tesis doctorales: TESEO. Available at https://www.educacion.es/teseo/irBusquedaAvanzada.do
Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002.
Munz, P. (1985). Our knowledge of the growth of knowledge: Popper or Wittgenstein?. London: Routledge.
National Science Foundation. (2010). Science and engineering indicators: 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/
Osuna, C., Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2011). Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance. Scientometrics, 86(3), 575–592. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0312-7.
Poincaré, H. (2002). La ciencia y la hipótesis. Madrid, Espasa. Original French title: La science et l’hypothèse (1902). Paris: Flammarion.
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.
Schmoch, U., Schubert, T., Cansen, D., Heidler, R., & von Gortz, R. (2010). How to use indicators to measure scientific performance: A balanced approach. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 2–18. doi:10.3152/095820210x492477.
Sharma, S., & Thomas, V. J. (2008). Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis. Scientometrics, 76(3), 483–501. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1896-4.
Shelton, R. D. (2008). Relations between national research investment and publication output; Application to an American paradox. Scientometrics, 74(2), 191–205. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0212-2.
SPSS Inc. & IBM Company. (2010). IBM SPSS statististic 19. Chicago: SPSS Inc. Available at http://www.spss.com
Sterman, J. D. (1985). The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 28(2), 93–122. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(85)90009-5.
ReliaSoft Inc. (2001). Reliability growth and repairable system data analysis online referente. ReliaSoft. Available in http://www.weibull.com/relgrowthwebcontents.htm
Szydlowski, M., & Krawiec, A. (2009). Growth cycles of knowledge. Scientometrics, 78(1), 99–111. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1958-7.
Szydlowsky, M., & Krawiec, A. (2001). Scientific cycle model with delay. Scientometrics, 52(1), 83–95. doi:10.1023/A:1012751028630.
Thurgood, L., Golladay, M. J., & Hill, S. T. (2006). U.S. doctorates in the 20th century. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf06319/pdf/nsf06319.pdf
Tseng, Y. H., Lin, Y. I., Hung, W. C., & Lee, C. H. (2009). A comparison of methods for detecting hot topics. Scientometrics, 81(1), 73–90. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-1885-x.
Vasileiadou, E. (2009). Stabilisation operationalised: Using time series analysis to understand the dynamics of research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.002.
Vico, G. (2005). New science: Principles of a new science concerning the common nature of the nations (3er rev. ed.). London: Penguin Classics. Original Italian tittle as Principi di scienza nuova d’intorno alla comune natura delle nazioni (1744).
Wald, A., & Wolfowitz, J. (1940). On a test whether two samples are from the same population. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11(2), 147–162. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731909.
Weibull (2011). Life data analysis (Weibull analysis) software tool. Reliability software. Tucson, AZ: ReliaSoft Corporation. Available at: http://www.reliasoft.com/Weibull/index.htm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M. & Vallejo, M. Time series of scientific growth in Spanish doctoral theses (1848–2009). Scientometrics 91, 15–36 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0572-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0572-x