Abstract
Based on the fact that in terms of research productivity, performance of women is weaker than men’s, and because little is known on the factors affecting academic women’s productivity in Iran, the present article aims to study factors affecting research productivity of Iranian women in ISI. To do this, at first, women who have already had published documents indexed in ISI were identified through Web of Science. Afterwards, in order to collect their view regarding factors affecting women’s research productivity, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. To analyze the collected data, the statistical software SPSS (version 17) was used. Both descriptive (Percentage and Frequency) and inferential (ANOVA) statistics were employed to reach valid findings. The findings indicate that the most motivational factors affecting positively publishing scholarly articles by Iranian women are ‘Getting promoted in scientific rank’, ‘Intrinsic talents’, ‘Perseverance and adventitious knowledge’, ‘Feeling of being useful in society’, ‘Getting promoted in job’, ‘Being encouraged by friends and family’, ‘Religious lessons regarding the importance of science’, and ‘Attempt to show individual capabilities’. Finally, some remarks for the improvement of the current condition are highlighted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric survey on the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79(3), 517–539.
Babu, A. R., & Singh, Y. P. (1998). Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, 43(3), 309–329.
Barzebat, D. A. (2006). Gender differences in research patterns among PhD economists. Journal of Economic Education, 37(3), 359–375.
Bihar al-Anwar (2001). In Jami’ al-Ahadith CD-ROM. 1 ed. Qom: Noor Publication. (In Persian).
Bloedel, J. R. (2001). Judging research productivity on an entrepreneurial campusé. Evaluation Research Productivity, 105. http://merrill.ku.edu/publications/2001whitepaper/bloedel.html.
Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication among men and women scientists. In M. W. Steimkamp & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Bean, J. P. (1981). Research output, socialization and the Biglan model. Research in Higher Education, 15(1), 69–89.
Davenport, H., & Snyder, H. (1995). Who cites women. Whom do women cite: An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology. Journal of Documentation, 51(4), 404–410.
Ding, W. W., Murray, F., & Stuart, T. E. (2006). Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science, 313(5787), 665–667.
Ferber, M. A. (1986). Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11(2), 281–289.
Fonseca, L., Velloso, S., Wofchuck, S., & De Meis, L. (1997). The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 39(2), 159–171.
Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150.
Hedjazi, Y., & Behravan, J. (2011). Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. Higher Education, http://www.springerlink.com/content/31p17x1uv547078w/.
Hüsing, T., & Selhofer, H. (2002). The digital divide index—a measure of social inequalities in the adoption of ICT. Paper presented at ECIS, Gdansk, June 6–8, http://www.empirica.com/publikationen/documents/2002/Huesing_Selhofer_DDIX_2002.pdf.
Kotrlik, J. W., Bartlett, J. E., Higgins, C. C., & Williams, H. A. (2002). Factors associated with research productivity of agricultural education faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(3), 1–10.
Larivière, V., Vignola-Gagné, E., Villeneuve, C., Gélinas, P., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: An analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics, 87(3), 483–498.
Leta, J. (2003). The contribution of women in Brazilian science: A case study in astronomy, immunology and oceanography. Scientometrics, 57(3), 339–353.
Long, J. S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1), 159–178.
Manjunath, L., & Shashidahra, K. K. (2011). Determinates of scientific productivity of Agricultural scientists. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 11(1), 7–12. http://www.seea.org.in/vol11-1-2011/02.pdf.
Mozaffarian, M., & Jamali, H. R. (2008). Iranian women in science: A gender study of scientific productivity in an Islamic country. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60(5), 463–473.
Nahj al-Fasahah. (2005). Sayings and traditions of Prophet Muhammad. Collected by Ali Shirvani. Qom: Dar al-Fekr Publication. (In Persian).
Parker, J. N., Lortie, C., & Allesina, S. (2010). Characterizing a scientific elite: The social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology. Scientometrics, 85(1), 129–143.
Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 891–920.
Tasviri-Ghamsari, F., & Jahannama, M. (2008). Studying scientific productivity of researchers at Engineering Research Institute. Librarianship and Information Science (an Iranian Journal), 10(2), 63–79.
Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201–222.
Wichian, S. N., Wongwanich, S., & Bowarnkitiwong, S. (2009). Factors affecting research productivity of faculty members in government universities: Lisrel and neural network analyses. http://kasetsartjournal.ku.ac.th/kuj_files/2009/A0906251543307343.pdf.
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. (1999). Commentary: Gender differences in research productivity. The Scientist, 13(19), 10.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University (Iran) for financial support of this research. They would like to thank the authorities and research staff of National Research Institute for Science Policy for their kind cooperation. It is the authors’ pleasure to extend their deep gratitude and thanks to the respected reviewers of the article for their helpful and constructive comments. Dr. Asghar Teymoorian-Motlagh is also appreciated for his useful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., Hasanzadeh, M. & Ghayoori, Z. A study of factors affecting research productivity of Iranian women in ISI. Scientometrics 91, 159–172 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0585-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0585-5