Skip to main content
Log in

South African universities in world rankings

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

South Africa has 23 universities, of which five are placed in one or more of the 2011 Shanghai Jiao Tong, Times Higher Education, and Quacquarelli Symonds world university rankings. The five are: Cape Town, Witwatersrand, KwaZulu-Natal, Stellenbosch and Pretoria. They are ranked above the other 18 universities, with Cape Town in top position, mainly because they have significantly higher publication and citation counts. In the Shanghai Jiao Tong ranking Cape Town’s Nobel Prize alumni and highly-cited researchers give it an additional lead over second-placed Witwatersrand, which has Nobel Prize alumni but no highly-cited researchers. KwaZulu-Natal, in third place, has no Nobel Prize alumni but one highly-cited researcher, which places it ahead of Stellenbosch and Pretoria despite the latter two having higher publication output. However, in the Times Higher Education ranking, which places Cape Town first and Witwatersrand second, Stellenbosch is ranked but not KwaZulu-Natal, presumably because the publication and citation counts of Stellenbosch are higher. The other 18 universities are ranked by the SCImago and Webometrics rankings in an order consistent with bibliometric indicators, and consistent with approximate simulations of the Shanghai Jiao Tong and Times Higher Education methods. If a South African university aspires to rise in the rankings, it needs to increase publications, citations, staff-student ratio, and proportions of postgraduate students, international students and international staff.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abt, H. (2007). The future of single-authored papers. Scientometrics, 73(3), 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J., King, C., & Hook, D. (2010). Global research report—Africa. Thomson Reuters. Accessed 12 November 2011, from http://thomsonreuters.com.

  • Aguillo, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asknes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejan, A. (2007). Why university rankings do not change: Education as a natural hierarchical flow architecture. Int. Journal of Design & Nature, 2(4), 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billaut, J.-C. (2010). Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? Scientometrics, 84(1), 237–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F. L., Seidler, H., Fieder, M., & Winckler, G. (2010). Too much noise in the Times Higher Education rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 295–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshoff, N. (2009). Shanghai academic ranking of world universities (ARWU) and the ‘big five’ South African research universities. South African Journal of Higher Education, 23(4), 635–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buela-Casal, G., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Bermúdez-Sánchez, M., & Vadillo-Muñoz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71(3), 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (2007). Academics strike back at spurious rankings. Nature, 447, 514–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehon, C., McCathie, A., & Verardi, V. (2010). Uncovering excellence in academic rankings: A closer look at the Shanghai ranking. Scientometrics, 83(2), 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dept of Education. (2010). Education statistics in South Africa 2009, Nov 2010, Dept of Basic Education, Republic of South Africa. Accessed 12 November 2011, from www.info.gov.za.

  • Florian, R. (2007). Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics, 72(1), 25–32.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. A., Patsopoulos, N. A., Kavvoura, F. K., Tatsioni, A., Evangelou, E., Kouri, I., et al. (2007). International ranking systems for universities and institutions: A critical appraisal. BioMed Central Medicine, 5, 30. Accessed 12 November 2012, from www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/5/30.

  • Leiden. (2011). Leiden ranking 2010: World. Accessed 12 November 2011, from http://socialsciences.leiden.edu/cwts/products-services/leiden-ranking-2010-cwts.html.

  • Liu, N. C., Cheng, Y., & Liu, L. (2005). Academic ranking of world universities using scientometrics. A comment to the ‘Fatal Attraction’. Scientometrics, 64(1), 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2007). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Swanson, C. (2011). On the efficacy of raising your University’s rankings. Ch 10, pp. 185–199. In: Shin et al. (2011).

  • Parker, J. N., Lortie, C., & Allesina, S. (2010). Characterizing a scientific elite: The social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology. Scientometrics, 85, 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouris, A. (2006). The international performance of the South African academic institutions: A citation assessment. Higher Education, 54(4), 501–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QS. (2011). QS world university rankings 2011/2012. Accessed 12 November 2011, from www.topuniversities.com.

  • Shin, J. C., Toutkoushian, R. K., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2011). University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education. Series: The Changing Academy—The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, 1st edn. Springer, Netherlands.

  • SIR. (2011). SCImago institutions ranking world report 2011: Global ranking. Accessed 12 November 2011, from www.scimagoir.com.

  • SJTU. (2011). Academic ranking of world universities 2011. Accessed 12 November 2011, from www.shanghairanking.com.

  • SU. (2011). SU now on Times Higher Education World University Rankings too. Accessed 13 November 2011, from http://blogs.sun.ac.za/news/2011/10/11.

  • Tettey, W. J. (2010). Challenges of developing and retaining the next generation of academics: Deficits in academic staff capacity at African universities. Commissioned by the Partnership for Higher Education in Africa. Accessed 12 November 2011, from www.foundation-partnership.org/pubs.

  • THE. (2011). Times Higher Education World University Rankings 20112012. Accessed 12 November 2011, from www.timeshighereducation.co.uk.

  • Tijssen, R. T. W. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71(2), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UCT. (2011). The strategic plan for the University of Cape Town 20102014: 10. Accessed 12 November 2011 from www.uct.ac.za/about/intro/goals.

  • UKZN. (2011). Strategic plan 20072016: 17. Accessed 12 November 2011, from www.ukzn.ac.za.

  • UP. (2011). Strategic plan 20072011. Accessed 12 November 2011, from www.up.ac.za.

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webometrics. (2011). Ranking Web of world universities: South Africa Accessed 9 November 2011, from www.webometrics.info.

  • WITS. (2011). Wits has a reputation built on research and academic excellence. Accessed 9 November 2011, from www.wits.ac.za.

  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316, 1036–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge useful discussions with Professors Francesco Petruccione, Richard Mace and Thomas Konrad.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Peter Matthews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, A.P. South African universities in world rankings. Scientometrics 92, 675–695 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0611-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0611-7

Keywords

Navigation