Skip to main content
Log in

The comprehensive competitiveness evaluation of American universities in Bridge Engineering

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores a method of evaluating the comprehensive competitiveness of American universities in Bridge Engineering, which is beneficial for students’ picking up an ideal university for further study in America. Making use of ESI database, SCI database and EI database as well as the ranking of American universities from U.S. News and World Report, the author evaluates the comprehensive competitiveness of American universities in Bridge Engineering, and then develops the ranking of comprehensive competitiveness of American universities in Bridge Engineering specialty. From the ranking, the author reaches the conclusion that American universities such as University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign and Georgia Institute of Technology and so on, have comparatively higher international influence and competitiveness in the field of Bridge Engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguillo, I. F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Databases by Search Options. (2011). http://library.dialog.com/bluesheets/html/bli.html. Accessed 13 February 2011.

  • Dialog Bluesheets. (2011). http://library.dialog.com/bluesheets. Accessed 13 February 2011.

  • Engineering Village 2. (2011). http://www.engineeringvillage.com. Accessed 6 June 2011.

  • Essential Science Indicators. (2010). http://esi.isiknowledge.com/home.cgi. Accessed 24 December 2010.

  • Huo, Y. R. (2003). Essential science indicators. Library and Information Service (in Chinese) (1), 56–59.

  • ISI Web of Knowledge. (2011). http://isiknowledge.com. Accessed 6 June 2011.

  • Li, C. Y., Ren, C. M. (2007). Bibliometrics analysis of highly cited papers published by Peking university from 1996 to 2006. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis (in Chinese), (5), 728–732.

  • Mi, H., Li, X. W. (2009). Analysis on ranking methodology of U.S. news and world report ranking of graduate schools and its enlightenments. Higher Education (Research and Evaluation) (in Chinese), (3), 53–58.

  • Network of Science and Education Evaluation in China. (2011). http://www.nseac.com. Accessed 12 February 2011.

  • Qiu, J. P., Ma, R. M. (2006). The function of citation index and science evaluation: With an example of the American essential science indicators. Evaluation and Management (in Chinese), (2), 1–8.

  • Qiu, J. P., Zhao, R.Y., Ma, R.M. (2006). How does ranking of research abilities of world universities come out. Higher Education Development and Evaluation (in Chinese), (3), 33–38.

  • U.S. News and World Report. (2010). Best engineering schools specialty rankings: Civil ranked in 2010http://www.usnews.com/sections/rankings/index.html. Accessed 11/11/2010.

  • U.S. News and World Report. (2011). http://www.usnews.com/. Accessed 6 June 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Ma, R., Tang, T. et al. The comprehensive competitiveness evaluation of American universities in Bridge Engineering. Scientometrics 91, 693–701 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0616-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0616-x

Keywords

Navigation