Skip to main content
Log in

Research on the cross-citation relationship of core authors in scientometrics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generally speaking, citation relationship among authors can be divided into 3 types: co-citation, coupling and cross-citation. Since author co-citation analysis was first introduced in 1982, it has been widely applied to study discipline structure, research state and research trends. Afterwards, conception of author bibliographic-coupling analysis was put forward and related empirical studies provided a method for mapping active authors in a research field for a more realistic picture of the current state of its research activities. Additionally, if one of author A’s papers has a citation from one of author B’s, there is cross-citation relationship between A and B. However, studies based on author cross-citation relationship mainly describe citation behaviors themselves using citation identity and citation image; they rarely involve any implicit knowledge communication, author research correlation or discovering academic communities. Author cross-citation analysis infers to both citing and cited phenomenon, which can be roughly correspond to citation identity and citation image. The study will further explore the author cross-citation relationship with core authors in scientometrics field as study object in order to provide reference for development of scientometrics field and in-depth application of citation analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blaise, C., & Debora, S. (2002). Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, 54(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 14(1), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mccain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(1), 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J. P. (2007). Informetrics (pp. 192–195). Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoepflin, U., & Glanzel, W. (2001). Two decades of “scientometrics”—an interdisciplinary field represented by its leading journal. Scientometrics, 50(2), 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (2002). The web of scientometrics: A statistical overview of the first 50 volumes of the journal. Scientometrics, 53, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Maczelka, H. (1993). Cognitive changes in scientometrics during the 1980s, as reflected by the reference patterns of its core journal. Social Studies of Science, 23(3), 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. (2010). Comparative analysis of author co-citation and author bibliographic-coupling relationship in scientometrics. Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban), 35(Special issue 1), 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (2004). Reward, Persuasion and the sokal hoax: A study in citation identities. Scientometrics, 60(1), 93–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008a). Information science during the first decade of the web: An enriched author cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 916–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008b). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070–2086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project no. 70973093) and supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (Project no. 201110401020006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feifei Wang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 290 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 11.

Table 11 Standardized cross-citation matrix among core authors (part of it)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, F., Qiu, J. & Yu, H. Research on the cross-citation relationship of core authors in scientometrics. Scientometrics 91, 1011–1033 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0621-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0621-0

Keywords

Navigation