Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of related and unrelated technological diversification on innovation performance and corporate growth in the Taiwan’s semiconductor industry

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses the entropy-based patent measure to discuss the effects of related technological diversification (RTD) and unrelated technological diversification (UTD) on innovation performance and corporate growth. The results indicate that RTD has a monotonically positive influence on both of innovation performance and corporate growth and UTD has an inverse U-shaped influence on both of them. Furthermore, the results show that the extent of the positive effect of RTD on innovation performance and corporate growth is better than that of UTD on both of them. If Taiwan’s semiconductor companies would like to undertake technological diversification, this study suggests that they should adopt RTD, rather than UTD. Besides, this study points out that innovation performance mediates the relationship between corporate growth and both of RTD and UTD. It demonstrates that RTD and UTD can directly affect corporate growth or indirectly influence it via innovation performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banker, R. D., Wattal, S., & Plehn-Dujowich, J. M. (2011). R&D versus acquisitions: Role of diversification in the choice of innovation strategy by information technology firms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2), 109–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Competitive organizational behavior: Toward an organizationally-based theory of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Reenen, J. V. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies, 66, 529–554.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32, 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. (2000). Accumulating technological competence: Its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni, F. (2004). Technological outsourcing and product diversification: Do markets for technology affect firms’ strategies? Research Policy, 33(10), 1547–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, P.-L., & Hsu, C.-W. (1998). The development strategies for Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(4), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, P.-L., & Tsai, C.-T. (2000). Evolution of technology development strategies for Taiwan’s semiconductor industry: Formation of research consortia. Industry and Innovation, 7(2), 185–197.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., & Blocher, J. D. (1992). Measurement of firm diversification: Is it robust? Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 874–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2009). Using neural network to analyze the influence of the patent performance upon the market value of the US pharmaceutical companies. Scientometrics, 80(3), 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010a). Analyzing the nonlinear effects of firm size, profitability, and employee productivity on patent citations of the US pharmaceutical companies by using artificial neural network. Scientometrics, 82(1), 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010b). Exploring the nonlinear effects of patent citations, patent share, and relative patent position on market value in the US pharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010c). The nonlinear nature of the relationships between the patent traits and corporate performance. Scientometrics, 82(1), 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, K.-C. (2010d). The relationship between a firm’s patent quality and its market value—The case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. H., & Jan, T. S. (2005). A system dynamics model of the semiconductor industry development in Taiwan. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(10), 1141–1150.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M.-J. J., & Chang, C.-H. (2006). The influence of intellectual capital on new product development performance-the manufacturing companies of Taiwan as an example. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 17(10), 1323–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M.-J. J., & Chang, C.-H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2), 152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Morales, V. J., Ruiz-Moreno, A., & Llorens-Montes, F. J. (2007). Effects of technology absorptive capacity and technology proactivity on organizational learning, innovation and performance: An empirical examination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 527–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35, 230–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O. (1998). Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy, 27, 465–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O., & Oskarsson, C. (1994). Technology diversification in ‘MUL-TECH’ corporations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41, 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multitechnology corporations: Why they have distributed rather than distinctive core competencies. California Management Review, 39, 8–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1984). R&D, patents and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H. (2002). A note on the bias in the Herfindahl based on count data. In A. Jaffe & M. Trajtenberg (Eds.), Patents, citations, and innovations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. (2007). Theory of strategic management. Kentucky, US: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1183–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, F. (1986). Technological diversification of Japanese industry. Science, 233(4761), 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. G., Lee, J. D., Song, Y. I., & Lee, S. J. (2007). An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data model: The case of KIST. Scientometrics, 70(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2007). Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 567–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B. W., Chen, C. J., & Wu, H. L. (2006). Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(1), 17–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. C., & Williamson, P. J. (1994). Related diversification, core competencies and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. J. (2006). Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 601–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Economic Affairs of Taiwan. (2011). The industrial development of Taiwan in 2011. Taipei: Ministry of Economic Affairs of Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competency of the world’s largest firms: Complex path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 6, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K., Robson, M., & Townsend, J. (1989). Technological accumulation, diversification and organisation in UK companies, 1945–1983. Management Science, 35, 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., Stuart, T., & Hannan, M. T. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 659–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana-Garica, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2008). Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37, 492–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R., & Luffman, G. A. (1986). Diversification: The growing confusion. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijamampianina, R., Abratt, R., & February, Y. (2003). A framework for concentric diversification through sustainable competitive advantage. Management Decision, 41(4), 362–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sher, P. J., & Yang, P. Y. (2005). The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: The evidence of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Technovation, 25(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. S. (1999). Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Science, 45(8), 1109–1124.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Soete, L., & Wyatt, S. (1983). The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator. Scientometrics, 5(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, I., & Henderson, A. D. (2004). Within-business diversification in technology-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, J., & Kodama, F. (2004). Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research Policy, 33, 531–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M. (1994). Innovation and industrial evolution mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valvano, S., & Vannoni, D. (2003). Diversification strategies and corporate coherence evidence from Italian leading firms. Review of Industrial Organization, 23, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S., & Linton, J. D. (2002). The measurement of technical competencies. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, National Taipei University, 151, University Rd., San Shia, New Taipei City, 237, Taiwan

    Yu-Shan Chen

  2. Department of Business Administration, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan

    Chun-Yu Shih

  3. Department of Business Administration, Tamkang University, New Taipei City, Taiwan

    Ching-Hsun Chang

Authors
  1. Yu-Shan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chun-Yu Shih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ching-Hsun Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Shan Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, YS., Shih, CY. & Chang, CH. The effects of related and unrelated technological diversification on innovation performance and corporate growth in the Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Scientometrics 92, 117–134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0720-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0720-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation