Abstract
The present study analyzes bibliometric characteristics of Taiwan’s highly cited papers published from 2000 to 2009. During this period, Taiwan ranked within the top 30 countries by number of highly cited papers, defined in Thomson Reuters’ Essential Science Indicators (ESI) as those that rank in the top 1 % by citations for their category and year of publication. Taiwan made notable progress in world-class research in the two consecutive 5-year periods 2000–2004 and 2005–2009. For the group of highly cited papers from Taiwan, USA, China, Germany, and Japan were the top collaborating countries over the decade. In recent years, Taiwan has increasingly collaborated with European countries whose output of highly cited papers is relatively high and increasing, rather than with its neighboring countries in Asia. Overall, Taiwan produced highly cited papers in all the 22 ESI subject categories during the 10-year period. Taiwan’s output of highly cited papers was greatest in the categories of Engineering, Clinical Medicine, and Physics, while those in Agricultural Sciences and Mathematics exceeded the expected output level in relative terms. More detailed analyses would be useful for a holistic understanding of Taiwan’s research landscape and their progress in world-class research, combining both bibliometric and non-bibliometric data, such as researcher mobility, research grants, and output from internationally-collaborated research programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abt, H. A. (2000). Do important papers produce high citation counts? Scientometrics, 48(1), 65–70. doi:10.1023/a:1005680318379.
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170. doi:10.3152/147154403781776645.
Aksnes, D. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2004). The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics, 59(2), 213–224. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018529.58334.eb.
Aversa, E. S. (1985). Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature. Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 383–389. doi:10.1007/bf02017156.
Basu, A. (2006). Using ISI’s ‘highly cited researchers’ to obtain a country level indicator of citation excellence. Scientometrics, 68(3), 361–375. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0117-x.
Frame, J. D., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 481–497.
Fu, H. Z., Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Characteristics of research in China assessed with essential science indicators. Scientometrics, 88(3), 841–862. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0416-8.
Huang, M. H., Chang, H. W., & Chen, D. Z. (2006). Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003. Scientometrics, 67(3), 419–435. doi:10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.6.
King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316. doi:10.1038/430311a.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). The most highly cited library and information science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78(1), 45–67. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1927-1.
Ma, R. M., Ni, C. Q., & Qiu, J. P. (2008). Scientific research competitiveness of world universities in computer science. Scientometrics, 76(2), 245–260. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1913-7.
National Science Council, Taiwan. (2006, November 14, 2011). Bilateral Cooperation. Retrieved March 6, 2012 from http://www.nsc.gov.tw/int/ct.asp?xItem=10186&ctNode=1210.
Persson, O. (2010). Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics, 83(2), 397–401. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0007-0.
Plomp, R. (1994). The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research groups scientific performance. Scientometrics, 29(3), 377–393. doi:10.1007/bf02033446.
Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (2011). Measuring research excellence number of nobel prize achievements versus conventional bibliometric indicators. Journal of Documentation, 67(4), 582–600. doi:10.1108/00220411111145007.
Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2002). Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics, 54(3), 381–397. doi:10.1023/a:1016082432660.
Zhu, X., Wu, Q., Zheng, Y. Z., & Ma, X. (2004). Highly cited research papers and the evaluation of a research university: A case study: Peking University 1974–2003. Scientometrics, 60(2), 237–247. doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000027795.69665.09.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miyairi, N., Chang, HW. Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan, 2000–2009. Scientometrics 92, 197–205 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0722-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0722-9