Skip to main content
Log in

Bibliometric characteristics of champion works of China and India

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Papers that have received 1,000 or more citations, referred to as champion works here, pertaining to China and India have been studied. China had its first champion work 4 years after India had its in 1983. While India was ahead of China in the initial years, China increased its tally of champion works during 2001–2010 and has raced ahead of India during that decade. All the champion works of both the countries have been published in foreign journals except for the one Indian paper that has been published in an Indian journal. Most champion works of India have been in physics whereas it has been in biological/biomedical sciences for China. USA, Japan, Germany, England and France are some of the leading countries that India and China have collaborated with for their champion works. Leading institutions of both countries are also listed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., & Balaji, J. (2001). Fish science research in China: How does it compare with fish research in India? Scientometrics, 52(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., & Gunasekaran, S. (2002a). Diabetes research in India and China today: From literature-based mapping to health-care policy. Current Science, 82(9), 1086–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., & Gunasekaran, S. (2002b). Tuberculosis research in India and China: From bibliometrics to research policy. Current Science, 82(8), 933–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalm, S. & Gunasekaran, S. (2001). Cardiovascular diseases research in India and China in the 1990s. In Proceedings of the ISSI-2001: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 53–62). Sydney, Australia: International conference.

  • Aversa, E. S. (1985). Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature. Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 383–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Mapping inventive activity and technological change through patent analysis: A case study of India and China. Scientometrics, 61(3), 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., Shilpa, & Bhati, M. (2012). China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race. Scientometrics, 93(1), 59–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Science and Technology. (2012). Bibliometric study of India’s Scientific Publication outputs during 2001-10. http://www.dst.gov.in/whats_new/whats_new12/report.pdf .

  • Desiraju, G. R. (1991). The C-H…O hydrogen-bond in crystals-what is it. Accounts of Chemical Research, 24(10), 290–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desiraju, G. R. (1995). Supermolecular synthons in crystal engineering—A-new organic-synthesis. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition in English, 34(21), 2311–2327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desiraju, G. R. (1996). The C-H center dot center dot center dot O hydrogen bond: Structural implications and supramolecular design. Accounts of Chemical Research, 29(9), 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desiraju, G. R. (2002). Hydrogen bridges in crystal engineering: Interactions without borders. Accounts of Chemical Research, 35(7), 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhawan, S. M. (1998). Comparative study of physics research in India and China based on INSPEC-PHYSICS for 1990 and 1995. Scientometrics, 43(3), 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. What is a citation classic? http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.

  • Garg, K. C. (2002). Scientometrics of laser research in India and China. Scientometrics, 55(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, T. K. (1987). Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 59(2), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1992). What are highly cited publications? A method applied to German scientific papers, 1980–1989. Research Evaluation, 2(3), 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2013). Thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 96(1), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1992). Some facts and figures on highly cited papers in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 25(3), 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., & Dhawan, S. M. (2003). India’s collaboration with People’s Republic of China in Science and Technology: A scientometrics analysis of coauthored papers during 1994–1999. Scientometrics, 57(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakkar, P., Das, B., & Viswanathan, P. N. (1984). A modified spectrophotometric assay of superoxide dismutase. Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics, 21(2), 130–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. S., & Garg, K. C. (2005). Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China. Scientometrics, 64(2), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh, G. (2012a). Champion works: how countries pan out. Current Science, 103(11), 1261–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh, G. (2012b). Indian and Chinese papers in Nature. Current Science, 103(2), 127.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miyairi, N., & Chang, H. W. (2012). Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan. 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 92(1), 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu, M., Chandrasekar, G., & Arunachalam, S. (2010). Highly cited papers from India and China. Current Science, 99(6), 738–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishy, P., & Prathap, G. (2011). Publish in foreign journals and prosper, or in Indian journals and perish. Current Science, 101(12), 1516–1517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan, T. (2003). Cosmological constant—the weight of the vacuum. Physics Reports-Review Section of Physics Letters, 380(5–6), 235–320.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Panchal, H. (2012). In conversation: David A. Pendlebury. Current Science, 103(10), 1144–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O. (2010). Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics, 83(2), 397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2013). Champion works: A second order analysis. Current Science, 104(5), 569–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., & Rousseau, R. (2002). International visibility of Chinese scientific journals. Scientometrics, 53(3), 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. R. (2008). Citation trends and citation classics at occupational medicine. Occupational Medicine, 58, 80–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H. (2009). The top 40 citation classics in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Scientometrics, 78(3), 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjari Manisha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manisha, M., Mahesh, G. Bibliometric characteristics of champion works of China and India. Scientometrics 98, 1101–1111 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1093-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1093-6

Keywords

Navigation