Abstract
In order to gain a deeper understanding of the international collaboration of global library and information science (LIS), the present paper investigated the trends, networks as well as core groups of the international collaboration in LIS at the country and institution levels by combining bibliometric analysis and social network analysis. In this study, a total of 8,570 papers from 15 core journals during the period of 2000–2011 were collected. The results indicate that 66 % of papers are joint publications in global LIS. Two-country papers and two-institution papers are the two primary collaboration patterns in the international collaboration at the country and institution levels respectively. Through social network analysis, it is observed that the country collaboration network has reached a certain degree of maturity over the past 12 years in global LIS, while the international institution collaboration network has not yet matured and is made up of dozens of components. In the country collaboration network, the position of USA and UK are remarkable. Although the USA is positioned at the center of the network, institutions located in the USA are more inclined to have collaboration within domestic, suggesting institutions in the USA have a low tendency towards international collaboration. In the institution collaboration network, it is found that two groups located in the USA and Europe respectively. The results of the institution collaboration network also reveal that Katholieke Univ Leuven has not only the largest collaboration breadth, but also strong capabilities to control communication within the international institution collaboration network.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11192-013-1146-x/MediaObjects/11192_2013_1146_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11192-013-1146-x/MediaObjects/11192_2013_1146_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11192-013-1146-x/MediaObjects/11192_2013_1146_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11192-013-1146-x/MediaObjects/11192_2013_1146_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11192-013-1146-x/MediaObjects/11192_2013_1146_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11192-013-1146-x/MediaObjects/11192_2013_1146_Fig6_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardanuy, J. (2012). Scientific collaboration in library and information science viewed through the web of knowledge: The Spanish case. Scientometrics, 90(3), 877–890.
Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377.
Börner, K., Penumarthy, S., Meiss, M., & Ke, W. (2006). Mapping the diffusion of scholarly knowledge among major US research institutions. Scientometrics, 68(3), 415–426.
Chang, H. W. (2009). A bibliometric analysis of Asian authorship pattern in JASIST 1981–2005. In Asia Pacific conference on library and information education and practice. Tsukuba: Japan University of Tsukuba. Accessed October 20, 2012, from http://www.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp/~atsushi/a-liep/proceedings/Papers/a31.pdf.
Chang, Y. W., & Huang, M. H. (2011). A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 22–33.
Chang, H. W., & Huang, M. H. (2013). Prominent institutions in international collaboration network in astronomy and astrophysics. Scientometrics, 97(2), 443–460.
Chincilla-Rodriguez, Z., Ferligoj, A., Miguel, S., et al. (2012). Blockmodeling of co-authorship networks in library and information science in Argentina: A case study. Scientometrics, 93(3), 699–717.
De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge university Press.
Franceschet, M. (2011). Collaboration in computer science: A network science approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1992–2012.
Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553.
Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227, 669–671.
Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.
Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461–473.
He, B., Ding, Y., & Yan, E. J. (2012). Mining patterns of author orders in scientific publications. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 359–367.
Hu, C. P., Hu, J. M., Gao, Y., et al. (2011). A journal co-citation analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 86(3), 657–670.
Jappe, A. (2007). Explaining international collaboration in global environmental change research. Scientometrics, 71(3), 367–390.
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.
Kliegl, R., & Bates, D. (2011). International collaboration in psychology is on the rise. Scientometrics, 87(1), 149–158.
Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519–533.
Lariviere, V., Sugimoto, C.R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred hears. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997–1016.
Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorship? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.
Lawani, S. M. (1981). Bibliometrics: Its theoretical foundations methods and applications. Libri, 31(4), 294–315.
Lee, D. H., Seo, I. W., Choe, H. C., et al. (2012). Collaboration network patterns and research performance: The case of Korean public research institutions. Scientometrics, 91(3), 925–942.
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325.
Liu, H. I., Chang, B. C., & Chen, K. C. (2012). Collaboration patterns of Taiwanese scientific publications in various research areas. Scientometrics, 92(1), 145–155.
Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17, 101–126.
McCarty, C. (2002). Measuring structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure, 3. Accessed August 23, 2013, http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume3/McCarty.html.
Milojevic, S., Sugimoto, C. R., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1933–1953.
Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 64(2), 025102.
Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256.
Nikzad, M., Jamali, H. R., & Hariri, N. (2011). Patterns of Iranian co-authorship networks in social sciences: A comparative study. Library and Information Science Research, 33(4), 313–319.
Nisonger, T. E., & Davis, C. H. (2005). The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the Kohl-Davis study. College and Research Libraries, 66(4), 341–377.
Schummer, J. (2007). The global institutionalization of nanotechnology research: A bibliometric approach to the assessment of science policy. Scientometrics, 70(3), 669–692.
Sin, S. C. J. (2011). International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six LIS journals, 1980–2008. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1770–1783.
Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). Regional development and interregional collaboration in the growth of nanotechnology research in China. Scientometrics, 86(1), 299–315.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.
Wang, X. W., Xu, S. M., et al. (2012). The role of Chinese–American scientists in China–US scientific collaboration: A study in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 91(3), 737–749.
Wolfram, D. (2012). An analysis of Canadian contributions to the information science research literature: 1989–2008. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 36(1–2), 52–66.
Yan, E. J., Ding, Y., & Zhu, Q. H. (2010). Mapping library and information science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics, 83(1), 115–131.
Yan, E., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2011). Institutional interactions: Exploring the social, cognitive, and geographic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1498–1514.
Yu, Q., Shao, H. F., He, P. F., et al. (2013). World scientific collaboration in coronary heart disease research. International Journal of Cardiology, 167(3), 631–639.
Zhao, D. Z. (2010). Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: A case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics, 84(2), 293–306.
Zhao, L. M., & Zhang, Q. P. (2011). Mapping knowledge domains of Chinese digital library research output, 1994–2010. Scientometrics, 89(1), 51–87.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to anonymous referees and editors for their invaluable and insightful comments. This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71273126 and 71303120) and the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11CYY031). The authors would like to thank Prof. YunBin Zhu (School of Foreign Studies, Anhui University), Dr. Jian Wu (School of Foreign Languages, Nanjing University of Posts & Telecommunications) for their useful comments and language editing which have greatly improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, P., Shi, J., Li, X. et al. International collaboration in LIS: global trends and networks at the country and institution level. Scientometrics 98, 53–72 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1146-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1146-x