Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Use of h index and g index for American academic psychiatry

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Several publication metrics are used for the evaluation of academic productivity. h index and g index are relatively new statistics for this purpose. Our aim is to evaluate academic psychiatrists’ h and g indices at different academic ranks in the United States. 30 psychiatry programs from the American Medical Association’s FREIDA online database were included to the study. From each academic rank, the total number of papers (P total), the single authored papers (P single) and the h and g indexes of faculty members were calculated by using one way ANOVA for multiple comparisons as primary analysis test. The metric medians as follows; P total = 34.5, P single = 13, g index = 19.5 and h index = 9. h index significantly differed between academic ranks except chairperson-professor. The other indices failed to distinguish junior academic ranks (associated professor-assistant professor) in addition to chairperson-professor. The strongest correlation was between h index and g indexes. Of the indices evaluated, the h-index is best tracked with academic ranking in psychiatry programs studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AMA. (2013). FREIDA online. Retrieved Feb 15, 2013 from http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/education-careers/graduate-medical-education/freida-online.shtml.

  • Benway, B. M., Kalidas, P., Cabello, J. M., & Bhayani, S. B. (2009). Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology, 74(1), 30–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bould, M. D., Boet, S., Sharma, B., Shin, E., Barrowman, N. J., & Grantcharov, T. (2011). H-indices in a university department of anaesthesia: An evaluation of their feasibility, reliability, and validity as an assessment of academic performance. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 106(3), 325–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, M., Fuller, C. D., & Thomas, C. R, Jr. (2009). Estimation of citation-based scholarly activity among radiation oncology faculty at domestic residency-training institutions: 1996–2007. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 74(1), 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2008). Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics, 77(2), 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca, L. A., John, A. S., Stolz, U., Matheson, L., Simpson, A., & Denninghoff, K. R. (2013). The distribution of the h-index among academic emergency physicians in the United States. Academic Emergency Medicine, 20(10), 997–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006a). An improvement of the H-index: The G-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 8–9.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006b). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal, 22(8), 2623–2628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fijalkowski, N., Zheng, L. L., Henderson, M. T., Moshfeghi, A. A., Maltenfort, M., & Moshfeghi, D. M. (2013). Academic productivity and its relationship to physician salaries in the university of California healthcare system. Southern Medical Journal, 106(7), 415–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gągolewski, M., & Grzegorzewski, P. (2009). A geometric approach to the construction of scientific impact indices. Scientometrics, 81(3), 617–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderman, R. B. (2004). The perils of paying academic physicians according to the clinical revenue they generate. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 10(2), RA15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A. W. (2010). Publish or perish for windows, Harzing.

  • Hedley-Whyte, et al. (2010). Chairpersons of pathology in the United States: Limited benchmarks for publications. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 134(2), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the H index have predictive power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 104(49), 19193–19198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, G. E., Cleary, M., & Walter, G. (2010). Psychiatry and the Hirsch h-index: The relationship between journal impact factors and accrued citations. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(4), 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search-comparison of major features of the web of science, scopus, and google scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science-Bangalore, 89(9), 1537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C. D., & Jennions, M. D. (2007). H-index: Age and sex make it unreliable. Nature, 449(7161), 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, N., Thompson, C. J., Choudhri, A. F., Boop, F. A., & Klimo, P, Jr. (2013). Part I: The application of the h-Index to groups of individuals and departments in academic neurosurgery. World Neurosurgery,. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.07.010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Kraus, K. L., Couldwell, W. T., et al. (2009). Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Journal of Neurosurgery, 111(2), 387–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meho, L. I., & Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and web of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1711–1726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, F. A., & Lozano, A. M. (2010). Academic impact and rankings of American and Canadian neurosurgical departments as assessed using the h index. Journal of Neurosurgery, 113(3), 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rad, A. E., Brinjikji, W., Cloft, H. J., & Kallmes, D. F. (2010). The H-index in academic radiology. Academic Radiology, 17(7), 817–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. (2006). The h index in science: A new measure of scholarly contribution. The Academic Observer 19(4).

  • Sangwal, K. (2012). On the relationship between citations of publication output and Hirsch index h of authors: Conceptualization of tapered Hirsch index h T, circular citation area radius R and citation acceleration a. Scientometrics, 93(3), 987–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svider, P. F., Choudhry, Z. A., Choudhry, O. J., Baredes, S., Liu, J. K., & Eloy, J. A. (2013a). The use of the h-index in academic otolaryngology. The Laryngoscope, 123(1), 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svider, P. F., Mady, L. J., Husain, Q., Sikora, A. G., Setzen, M., Baredes, S., et al. (2013b). Geographic differences in academic promotion practices, fellowship training, and scholarly impact. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 34(5), 464–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svider, P. F., Pashkova, A. A., Choudhry, Z., Agarwal, N., Kovalerchik, O., Baredes, S., et al. (2013c). Comparison of scholarly impact among surgical specialties. The Laryngoscope, 123(4), 884–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. S. J. (2008). A rational, successive g-index applied to economics departments in Ireland. Journal of Informatics, 2(2), 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: However ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Salih Selek

  2. Psychiatry Department, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

    Ayman Saleh

Authors
  1. Salih Selek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ayman Saleh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salih Selek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selek, S., Saleh, A. Use of h index and g index for American academic psychiatry. Scientometrics 99, 541–548 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1204-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1204-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation