Skip to main content
Log in

On the data and analysis of the research output of India and China: India has significantly fallen behind China

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of the number of research papers from India and China in the fields of sciences and engineering between the years 1975 and 2012 is presented. The results show that while Indian research output has increased steadily, the Chinese research output has been increasing at a rate far outpacing that of India. The research output of China has been increasing with distinct inflection points that show an acceleration in output growth. The research output for India shows periodic inflection points that show either an acceleration or deceleration in output growth. The possible reasons for the inflection points are discussed. Simple statistical analyses are used to analyze the trends in output. Although multiple factors affect a nation’s research output, this paper highlights that the government programs targeted to increase the research output from universities may create inflection points resulting in a rapid increase in the research output. The article also highlights that India has fallen far behind China in terms of scientific and engineering research output, providing important clues for the future growth of the two countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadie, A. (2005). Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Review of Economic Studies, 72, 1–19.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J., Pendlebury, D., & Stembridge, B. (2013). Building bricks: Exploring the global research and innovation impact of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Korea. Global Research Digests, Thomson Reuters.

  • Altenburg, T., Schmitz, H., & Stamm, A. (2008). Breakthrough? China’s and India’s transition from production to innovation. World Development, 36, 244–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., & Balaji, J. (2004). Fish science research in China: How does it compare with fish research in India? Scientometrics, 52, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., & Gunasekaran, S. (2002). Diabetes research in India and China today: From literature-based mapping to health-care policy. Current Science, 82, 1086–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. (2011). Fixed effects. Chicago: Harris School of Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaumik, P., Chakrabarti, A., & Makinen, S. (2009). Technology development in China and India: A comparative evaluation. Journal of Indian Business Research, 1, 213–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, B., & Colluns, S. (2007). Accounting for growth: Comparing China and India. National Bureau of Economic Growth (Working Paper Number 12943). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Growth.

  • Braun, T., & Schubert, A. (1996). Indicators of research output in the sciences from 5 Central European countries, 1990–1994. Scientometrics, 36, 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. P., Gibb, F., Harris, M., Irvine, J., Martin, B. R., & Narin, F. (1988). Bibliometric profiles for British academic institutions: An experiment to develop research output indicators. Scientometrics, 14, 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasing the Dragon: How the Asian superpowers compare on various measures of development. The Economist (2011).

  • Cunningham, P. (1997). The evaluation of European programs and the future of scientometrics. Scientometrics, 38, 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. (2008). The research assessment exercise in Hong Kong: Positive and negative consequences. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 9, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P., Aghion, P., & Foray, D. (2008). Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: Linking policy research and practice in “STIG Systems”. Paper No. MPRA Paper 12096. Munich: University Library of Munich.

  • Garg, K. (2002). Scientometrics of laser research in India and China. Scientometrics, 55, 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., & Khanna, T. (2003). Can India overtake China? Foreign Policy, 137, 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2012). IMF statistics. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Contreras, E., de Moya Anegón, F., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2003). The evolution of research activity in Spain: The impact of the National Commission for the Evaluation of Research Activity (CNEAI). Research Policy, 32, 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanhere, D., Arjunwadkar, M., & Vichare, A. (2009). Rise and decline of India’s state university system: Neglect, design, or neglect by design? Current Science, 97, 1013–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., & Garg, K. (2005). Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China. Scientometrics, 64, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. (2013). Special economic zones and growth in China and India: An empirical investigation. International Economics and Economic Policy, 10, 549–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhan, M., Chandrasekar, G., & Arunachalam, S. (2010). Highly cited papers from India and China. Current Science, 99, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275, 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1998). The scientific investments of nations. Science, 281, 48–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeh, H. (2008). UK research assessment exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity? Scientometrics, 74, 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, K. (2012). The Indian landscape after two decades of liberalization: An introduction. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 53, 1–6.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, L., & Mustar, P. (2001). French research and innovation policy: Two decades of transformation. In E. Elgar (Ed.), Research and innovation policies in the new global economy: An international comparative analysis (pp. 447–496). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. (2006). China, India and the world economy. Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 3716–3727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, M., & Hussler, C. (2011). Betting on indigenous innovation or relying on FDI: The Chinese strategy for catching-up. Technology in Society, 33, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Database (2013). Washington, DC.

  • Wright, T. (2012). India far from overtaking China, report says. Wall Street Journal.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to the memory of author’s father, late Prof. Padmakar V. Panat (1943–2009) who deeply cared about the state of the higher education in India. The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Panat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panat, R. On the data and analysis of the research output of India and China: India has significantly fallen behind China. Scientometrics 100, 471–481 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1236-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1236-4

Keywords

Navigation