Abstract
This study demonstrates the continued existence of gender disparity with respect to salary in four neurologic specialties in the largest public healthcare system of the Western United States without the bias of self-report. We extracted physician salary information from the publicly available UC pay system database and obtained Scopus (http://www.scopus.com/home.url) and Web of Science publication counts and h-indices via searching individual faculty by name and specialty. Faculty gender, institution, specialty, ranking, chairmanship, degrees, and salary data were collected through review of departmental websites and individual faculty profiles. All faculty members (n = 433) from the departments of ophthalmology, otolaryngology, neurosurgery and neurology in the UC pay system database in 2008 were selected for analysis. We found that female faculty members in the 2008 UC healthcare system were significantly underrepresented from the highest salary brackets, representing only 12.5 and 2.6 % of those earning $300,001–$400,000 and over $400,000, respectively (p < 0.01). The female-to-male salary ratio in 2008 for all UC physicians earning over $100,000 was 0.698 (p < 0.00001). Multivariate regression modeling demonstrated a 12 % salary deficit (95 % CI 2–21 %, p = 0.02) for women in the UC healthcare system after controlling for institution, professorial rank, chairmanship, specialty, Scopus publication count, and Scopus h-index. Despite recent efforts at educational equality in the training of physicians, gender disparities still persist within academic medicine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, N. C. (2007). Climbing through medicine’s glass ceiling. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(19), 1887–1889.
Ash, A. S., Carr, P. L., Goldstein, R., & Friedman, R. H. (2004). Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity? Annals of Internal Medicine, 141(3), 205–212.
Hildrun, K., Alexander, P., & Johannes, S. (2012). Research evaluation. Part II: gender effects of evaluation: are men more productive and more cited than women? Scientometrics, 93(1), 17–30.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.
Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the H index have predictive power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 104(49), 19193–19198.
Jagsi, R., Griffith, K., Stewart, A., Sambuco, D., DeCastro, R., & Ubel, P. (2012). Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307(22), 2410–2417.
Jagsi, R., Guancial, E. A., Worobey, C. C., et al. (2006). The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—a 35 years perspective. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(3), 281–287.
Kaplan, S. H., Sullivan, L. M., Dukes, K. A., Phillips, C. F., Kelch, R. P., & Schaller, J. G. (1996). Sex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(17), 1282–1289.
Krefting, L. (2003). Intertwined discourses of merit and gender: Evidence from academic employment in the USA. Gender, Work & Organization, 10(2), 260–278.
Kulasegarah, J., & Fenton, J. E. (2010). Comparison of the h index with standard bibliometric indicators to rank influential otolaryngologists in Europe and North America. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 267(3), 455–458.
Lambert, E. M., & Holmboe, E. S. (2005). The relationship between specialty choice and gender of US medical students, 1990–2003. Academic Medicine, 80(9), 797–802.
Lo Sasso, A. T., Richards, M. R., Chou, C. F., & Gerber, S. E. (2011). The $16,819 pay gap for newly trained physicians: the unexplained trend of men earning more than women. Health Affairs (Millwood), 30(2), 193–201.
Longo, P., & Straehley, C. J. (2008). Whack! I’ve hit the glass ceiling! Women’s efforts to gain status in surgery. Gender Medicine, 5(1), 88–100.
McMurray, J. E., Linzer, M., Konrad, T. R., Douglas, J., Shugerman, R., & Nelson, K. (2000). The work lives of women physicians results from the physician work life study. The SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15(6), 372–380.
Monroe, K., Ozyurt, S., Wrigley, T., & Alexander, A. (2008). Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 215–233.
Ponce, F. A., & Lozano, A. M. (2010). Academic impact and rankings of American and Canadian neurosurgical departments as assessed using the h index. Journal of Neurosurgery, 113(3), 447–457.
Sangwal, K. (2012). On the age-independent publication index. Scientometrics, 91(3), 1053–1058.
Tesch, B. J., Wood, H. M., Helwig, A. L., & Nattinger, A. B. (1995). Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor? Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(13), 1022–1025.
van Arensbergen, P., van der Weijden, I., & van den Besselaar, P. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, 93(3), 857–868.
Weeks, W. B., Wallace, T. A., & Wallace, A. E. (2009). How do race and sex affect the earnings of primary care physicians? Health Affairs (Millwood), 28(2), 557–566.
Women in US Academic Medicine: Statistics and Benchmarking Report. 2009.
Wright, A. L., Schwindt, L. A., Bassford, T. L., et al. (2003). Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US College of Medicine. Academic Medicine, 78(5), 500–508.
Zhuge, Y., Kaufman, J., Simeone, D. M., Chen, H., & Velazquez, O. C. (2011). Is there still a glass ceiling for women in academic surgery? Annals of Surgery, 253(4), 637–643.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henderson, M.T., Fijalkowski, N., Wang, S.K. et al. Gender differences in compensation in academic medicine: the results from four neurological specialties within the University of California Healthcare System. Scientometrics 100, 297–306 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1266-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1266-y