Abstract
This study aims at exploring whether significant inventions are more technologically diversified or have more diverse applications, investigating whether there are any innovation laws existing in R&D activities. Based on technology co-classification analysis, we select patent dataset meets the specific standard from the worldwide patent database named Derwent Innovations Index as sample dataset. Three indicators out of four verify the proposed hypotheses, i.e., significant inventions are more diversified in terms of individual invention. The fourth indicator implies that focusing on some core technology domains maybe better for creating significant inventions when R&D activities are considered as a whole. The results are of great theoretical significance by helping us identifying the diversified characteristic laws of significant inventions; moreover, they are of crucial practical meanings to R&D work and technology innovation activities etc.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b44c5/b44c59377962924399d54013d7dd2ac447e1ac28" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc7b3/bc7b340cf7d3045e518a9230615f45edf2eb7b9f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0607e/0607ee835f7c35dcf2e2f6e7daaea3b246d3e676" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e87f/5e87f9f69ce224bc7a3a114abcadbf93ead6f662" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altshuller, H. (2001). And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.
Anton, J. J., & Yao, D. A. (1995). Start-ups, spin-offs, and internal projects. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 11(2), 362–378.
Archambault, E., & Lariviere, V. (2011). Scientific publications and patenting by companies: a study of the whole population of Canadian firms over 25 years. Science and Public Policy, 38(4), 269–278.
Castaldi, C., Milakovic, M., et al. (2006). Scale and technological factors in the diversification structure of business firms. Economics Letters, 91(1), 117–121.
Chang, S. B., Lai, K. K., et al. (2009). Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods: Using the patent citation network. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 107–117.
Chen, Y. S., & Chang, K. C. (2012). Using the entropy-based patent measure to explore the influences of related and unrelated technological diversification upon technological competences and firm performance. Scientometrics, 90(3), 825–841.
Chen, D. Z., Huang, M. H., et al. (2011). Identifying missing relevant patent citation links by using bibliographic coupling in LED illuminating technology. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 400–412.
Chen, Y. S., Shih, C. Y., & Chang, C. H. (2012). The effects of related and unrelated technological diversification on innovation performance and corporate growth in the Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Scientometrics, 92(1), 117–134.
Chiu, Y. C., Lai, H. C., Lee, T. Y., & Liaw, Y. C. (2008). Technological diversification, complementary assets, and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(6), 875–892.
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., et al. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103–1113.
Csardi, G., Strandburg, K. J., Zalanyi, L., et al. (2007). Modeling innovation by a kinetic description of the patent citation system. Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 374(2), 783–793.
Daye, C. (2008). An introduction to science and technology studies. Social Studies of Science, 38(2), 303–312.
de Moura, A. M. M., & Caregnato, S. E. (2010). Co-classification between articles and patents: a study of the interaction between S & T on Brazilian Biotech. Informacao & Sociedade-Estudos, 20(2), 119–132.
Erdi, P., Makovi, K., Somogyvari, Z., et al. (2013). Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network. Scientometrics, 95(1), 225–242.
Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2), 230–246.
Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D., & Phaal, R. (2013). A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 332–3, 30–37.
Koren, M., & Tenreyro, S. (2013). Technological diversification. American Economic Review, 103(1), 378–414.
Lam, Y. L. J., & Cistone, P. J. (1973). School structure and technological diversification. Educational Technology, 13(8), 52–55.
Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2007). Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 567–579.
Li, Z., Tate, D., & Lane, C. (2012). A framework for automatic TRIZ level of invention estimation of patents using natural language processing, knowledge-transfer and patent citation metrics. Computer-Aided Design, 44(10), 987–1010.
Luan, C., Liu, Z., & Wang, X. (2013). Divergence and convergence: Technology-relatedness evolution in solar energy industry. Scientometrics, 97(2), 461–475.
Meyer, M., Debackere, K., & Glanze, W. (2010). Can applied science be ‘good science’? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience. Scientometrics, 85(2), 527–539.
Narin, F. (1994). Patent citation indicators. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 20(8), 42–52.
Narin, F., Smith, V. M., & Albert, M. B. (1993). What patents tell you about your competition. Chemtech, 23(2), 52–59.
Nicholas, T. (2010). The role of independent invention in US technological development, 1880–1930. Journal of Economic History, 70(1), 57–82.
Patel, D., & Ward, M. R. (2011). Using patent citation patterns to infer innovation market competition. Research Policy, 40(6), 886–894.
Persson, O. (2012). BibExcel. from http://www8.umu.se/inforsk/Bibexcel/. 2013-05-16.
Persson, O., & Dastidar, P. G. (2013). Citation analysis to reconstruct the dynamics of Antarctic ozone hole research and formulation of the Montreal Protocol. Current Science, 104(7), 835–840.
Puri, S., Quadir, I. Z., Battaglia, G. J., et al. (2011). The big question greatest thing since… what is the most significant invention of the past decade, and what do you anticipate for the future? World Policy Journal, 28(3), 3–7.
Silverberg, G., & Verspagen, B. (2007). The size distribution of innovations revisited: An application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance. Journal of Econometrics, 139(2), 318–339.
Sismondo, S. (2001). An introduction to science and technology studies. New York: Wiley.
Spasser, M. A. (1997). Mapping the terrain of pharmacy: Co-classification analysis of the international pharmaceutical abstracts database. Scientometrics, 39(1), 77–97.
Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(1), 93–115.
von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 155–174.
Yamashina, H., Ito, T., & Kawada, H. (2002). Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRIZ. International Journal of Production Research, 40(5), 1031–1050.
Yang, C. J., & Chen, J. L. (2012). Forecasting the design of eco-products by integrating TRIZ evolution patterns with CBR and Simple LCA methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2884–2892.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for the important comments. The research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 71073015, 71103064, 71103022; Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of “Ethical issues of high-tech” under Grant No. 12&ZD117; Key Project of the National Social Science Fund of “Promoting the construction of socialist culture and powerful country” under Grant No. 13AZD016; the Project of Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT14XXXX, undetermined).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See the Table 3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luan, C., Hou, H., Wang, Y. et al. Are significant inventions more diversified?. Scientometrics 100, 459–470 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1303-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1303-x