Abstract
Author co-citation analysis (ACA) was an important method for discovering the intellectual structure of a given scientific field. There was sufficient experience that ACA would work with almost any user data that lent itself to co-occurrence. While most of the current researches still relied on the data of scientific literatures. In this study, in order to provide useful information for better enterprise management, the idea and method of ACA was applied to analyze the information interaction intensity and contents of enterprise web users. Firstly, the development of ACA was briefly introduced. Then the sample data and method used in this study were given. Three QQ groups’ instant messages of a Chinese company were selected as the raw data and the concepts and model of user interaction intensity (UII) were proposed by referring the ACA theory. Social network analysis method, combined with in-deep interview method were used to analyze the information interaction intensity and contents of enterprise users. Operatively, Excel, Ucinet, Pajek, Netdraw and VOSviewer software were combined to analyze them quantitatively and visually. Finally, it concluded that UII model was relatively reasonable and it could nicely measure the information interaction intensity and contents of enterprise web users.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Behrend, F. D., & Erwee, R. (2009). Mapping knowledge flows in virtual teams with SNA. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 99–114.
Borgatti, S. P. (2004). NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374.
Chen, C. (1999). Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries. Information Processing and Management, 35(3), 401–420.
Groh, G., & Fuchs, C. (2011). Multi-modal social networks for modeling scientific fields. Scientometrics, 89(2), 569–590.
Jevremov, T., Pajic, D., & Sipka, P. (2007). Structure of personality psychology based on cocitation analysis of prominent authors. Psihologija, 40(2), 329–343.
Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7–15.
Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage.
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2006). Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 475–499.
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.
Leydesdorff, L., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(12), 1616–1628.
Leydesdorff, L., Hammarfelt, B., & Salah, A. A. A. (2011). The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 2414–2426.
Leydesdorff, L., Kushnir, D., & Rafols, I. (2014). Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC). Scientometrics, 98(3), 1583–1599.
Ma, R. M., Dai, Q. B., Ni, C. Q., & Li, X. L. (2009). An author co-citation analysis of information science in China with Chinese Google Scholar search engine, 2004–2006. Scientometrics, 81(1), 33–46.
McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.
Moya-Anegon, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Corera-Alvarez, E., Munoz-Fernandez, F. J., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Visualizing the marrow of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2167–2179.
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113.
Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Noyons, E. C. M., & Calero-Medina, C. (2009). Applying bibliometric mapping in a high level science policy context. Scientometrics, 79(2), 261–275.
Osareh, F., & McCain, K. W. (2008). The structure of Iranian chemistry research, 1990–2006: An author cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2146–2155.
Peters, H. P. F., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1993). Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part II: Representations by combined clustering and multidimensional scaling. Research Policy, 22(1), 47–71.
Qiu, J. P., & Ma, R. M. (2009). The application of ACA method in web environment. Library and Information Service, 52(2), 85–87. (in Chinese).
Schvaneveldt, R. W., Dearholt, D. W., & Durso, F. T. (1988). Graph theoretic foundations of pathfinder networks. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 15(4), 337–345.
Small, H., Sweeney, E., & Greenlee, E. (1985). Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. II. Mapping science. Scientometrics, 8(5–6), 321–340.
Ucinet. (2004). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
VanEck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Softwares survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Vaughan, L., & You, J. (2010). Word co-occurrences on Webpages as a measure of the relatedness of organizations: A new Webometrics concept. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 483–491.
Wallace, M. L., Gingras, Y., & Duhon, R. (2009). A new approach for detecting scientific specialties from raw cocitation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 240–246.
Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.
Wang, Z. F. (2011). Use and management of internet communication tools in community constructions—take L community in Hangzhou for example. Unpublished master’s thesis, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China. (in Chinese).
Wang, X. W., Hu, Z. G., Ding, K., & Liu, Z. Y. (2011). Research on classification of singers in online music websites based on co-citation theory. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 30(5), 471–478. (in Chinese).
White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423–434.
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171.
White, H. D., & McCain, K. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.
Xu, L. M. (2011). Research on mechanism of enterprise internal knowledge sharing based on social network. Unpublished master’s thesis, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. (in Chinese).
Xu, Y. Y., & Zhu, Q. H. (2008). Demonstration study of social network analysis method in citation analysis. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 31(2), 184–188. (in Chinese).
Zhang, L., Liu, X., Janssens, F., Liang, L., & Glanzel, W. (2010). Subject clustering analysis based on ISI category classification. Journal of Informetrics, 4(2), 185–193.
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Information science during the first decade of the Web: An enriched author cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 916–937.
Zuccala, A. (2006). Author cocitation analysis is to intellectual structure as web colink analysis is to… ? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1487–1502.
Acknowledgments
This paper is supported by Major Program of National Social Science Foundation in China (Grant No. 11&ZD152), Program of Social Science Foundation by Ministry of Education in China (Grant No. 13YJA870023) and High-level International Journal Program of Wuhan University (Grant No. 2012GSP062). This is an extended version of a paper presented at the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Vienna (Austria), 15–19 July 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, R., Chen, B. Applying author co-citation analysis to user interaction analysis: a case study on instant messaging groups. Scientometrics 101, 985–997 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1314-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1314-7
Keywords
- Webometrics
- Usage metrics
- Author co-citation analysis
- Instant messaging
- Social network analysis
- Information visualization
- Enterprise management