Skip to main content
Log in

Linked title mentions: a new automated link search candidate

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many webometric studies have used hyperlinks to investigate links to or between specific collections of websites to estimate their impact or identify connectivity patterns. Whilst major commercial search engines have previously been used to identify hyperlinks for these purposes, their hyperlink search facilities have now been shut down. In response, a range of alternative sources of link data have been suggested, but all have limitations. This article introduces a new type of link that can be identified from commercial search engines, linked title mentions. These can be found by querying title mentions in a search engine and then removing those not associated with a relevant hyperlink. Results of a proof of concept test on 51 U.S. library and information science schools and four other sets of schools suggest that linked title mentions may tend to give better results than title mentions in some cases when used for site inlinks but may not always be an improvement on URL citations. For links between or co-inlinks to specified pairs of academic websites, linked title mentions do not generally provide an improvement over title mentions, but they do over URL citations in some cases. Linked title mentions may also be useful for sets of non-academic websites when the alternatives give too few or misleading results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-library-information-science-programs/library-information-science-rankings

  2. http://lexiurl.wlv.ac.uk/images/USLISDepts2013.txt

References

  • Aguillo, I. F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguillo, I. F., Granadino, B., Ortega, J. L., & Prieto, J. A. (2006). Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1296–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J., & Peritz, B. C. (2009). A method for measuring the evolution of a topic on the web: The case of “Informetrics”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1730–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, H., He, S., & Thelwall, M. (2002). Library and information science schools in Canada and USA: A webometric perspective. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 43(2), 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cothey, V. (2004). Web-crawling reliability. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1228–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, K. E., Thelwall, M., & Meyer, E. T. (2012). Measuring the web impact of digitised scholarly resources. Journal of Documentation, 68(4), 512–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, R. (2009). Google link: command—Busting the myths, The Moz Blog. Retrieved August 8, 2013 from: http://moz.com/blog/google-link-command-busting-the-myths

  • Heimeriks, G., Hoerlesberger, M., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2003). Mapping communication and collaboration in heterogeneous research networks. Scientometrics, 58(2), 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, K. (2010). Co-inlinking to a municipal Web space: A webometric and content analysis. Scientometrics, 83(3), 851–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(2), 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers, K., De Moya Anegon, F., & Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Measuring the usage of e-research infrastructure as an indicator of research activity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1374–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles. Scientometrics, 68(3), 501–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, H., & Aguillo, I. F. (2004). Visibility of collaboration on the web. Scientometrics, 61(3), 405–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. R. (1996). Bibliometrics of the world wide web: An exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 33, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepori, B., Barberio, V., Seeber, M., & Aguillo, I. (2013). Core-periphery structures in national higher education systems. A cross-country analysis using interlinking data. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 622–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Thelwall, M., Musgrove, P. B., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). The relationship between the WIFs or inlinks of computer science departments in UK and their RAE ratings or research productivities in 2001. Scientometrics, 57(2), 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettrop, W., & Nieuwenhuysen, P. (2001). Internet search engines—Fluctuations in document accessibility. Journal of Documentation, 57(5), 623–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2009). Mapping world-class universities on the web. Information Processing and Management, 45(2), 272–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, J. L., Orduña-Malea, E., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014). Are web mentions accurate substitutes for inlinks for Spanish universities? Online Information Review, 38(1), 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W. (2010). Mapping the e-science landscape in South Korea using the webometrics method. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez i Gairín, J. M. (1997). Valorando el impacto de la información en internet: AltaVista, el “citation index” de la red (evaluating the impact of internet information: AltaVista, the “citation index” of the web). Revista Española De Documentación Científica, 20(2), 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Frias, E., & Vaughan, L. (2010). European political trends viewed through patterns of web linking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 2109–2121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (1999). Daily time series of common single word searches in AltaVista and NorthernLight. Cybermetrics, 2/3, Retrieved January 21, 2014 from: http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v2i1p2.pdf.

  • Seeber, M., Lepori, B., Lomi, A., Aguillo, I., & Barberio, V. (2012). Factors affecting web links between European higher education institutions. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. G. (1999). A tale of two web spaces; comparing sites using web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 55(5), 577–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, D., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Investigating triple helix relationships using URL citations: A case study of the UK west midlands automobile industry. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2000). Web impact factors and search engine coverage. Journal of Documentation, 56(2), 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2001). Results from a web impact factor crawler. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2002). Conceptualizing documentation on the web: An evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university web sites. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 995–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2006). Interpreting social science link analysis research: A theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2008). Extracting accurate and complete results from search engines: Case study Windows Live. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2011). A comparison of link and URL citation counting. ASLIB Proceedings, 63(4), 419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., & Harries, G. (2004). Do the web sites of higher rated scholars have significantly more online impact? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Klitkou, A., Verbeek, A., Stuart, D., & Vincent, C. (2010). Policy-relevant webometrics for individual scientific fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1464–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (in press). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating and measuring scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.

  • Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2011). A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organisations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1488–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2012). Webometric research with the Bing Search API 2.0. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Sud, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2012). Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(4), 805–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., & Hysen, K. (2002). Relationship between links to journal Web sites and impact factors. ASLIB Proceedings, 54(6), 356–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14), 1313–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., & Yang, R. (2012). Web data as academic and business quality estimates: A comparison of three data sources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1960–1972. doi:10.1002/asi.22659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., & You, J. (2006). Comparing business competition positions based on web co-link data: The global market versus the Chinese market. Scientometrics, 68(3), 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., Boell, S. K., Yu, H., Davis, M., Wilson, C. S., & Cole, F. T. (2009). Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1083–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Search markets and search results: The case of Bing. Library and Information Science Research, 35(4), 318–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by ACUMEN (Academic Careers Understood through Measurement and Norms) project, Grant agreement number 266632, under the Seventh Framework Program of the European Union.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Thelwall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sud, P., Thelwall, M. Linked title mentions: a new automated link search candidate. Scientometrics 101, 1831–1849 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1374-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1374-8

Keywords

Navigation