Abstract
Many webometric studies have used hyperlinks to investigate links to or between specific collections of websites to estimate their impact or identify connectivity patterns. Whilst major commercial search engines have previously been used to identify hyperlinks for these purposes, their hyperlink search facilities have now been shut down. In response, a range of alternative sources of link data have been suggested, but all have limitations. This article introduces a new type of link that can be identified from commercial search engines, linked title mentions. These can be found by querying title mentions in a search engine and then removing those not associated with a relevant hyperlink. Results of a proof of concept test on 51 U.S. library and information science schools and four other sets of schools suggest that linked title mentions may tend to give better results than title mentions in some cases when used for site inlinks but may not always be an improvement on URL citations. For links between or co-inlinks to specified pairs of academic websites, linked title mentions do not generally provide an improvement over title mentions, but they do over URL citations in some cases. Linked title mentions may also be useful for sets of non-academic websites when the alternatives give too few or misleading results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguillo, I. F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243–256.
Aguillo, I. F., Granadino, B., Ortega, J. L., & Prieto, J. A. (2006). Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1296–1302.
Bar-Ilan, J., & Peritz, B. C. (2009). A method for measuring the evolution of a topic on the web: The case of “Informetrics”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1730–1740.
Chu, H., He, S., & Thelwall, M. (2002). Library and information science schools in Canada and USA: A webometric perspective. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 43(2), 110–125.
Cothey, V. (2004). Web-crawling reliability. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1228–1238.
Eccles, K. E., Thelwall, M., & Meyer, E. T. (2012). Measuring the web impact of digitised scholarly resources. Journal of Documentation, 68(4), 512–526.
Fishkin, R. (2009). Google link: command—Busting the myths, The Moz Blog. Retrieved August 8, 2013 from: http://moz.com/blog/google-link-command-busting-the-myths
Heimeriks, G., Hoerlesberger, M., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2003). Mapping communication and collaboration in heterogeneous research networks. Scientometrics, 58(2), 391–413.
Holmberg, K. (2010). Co-inlinking to a municipal Web space: A webometric and content analysis. Scientometrics, 83(3), 851–862.
Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(2), 236–243.
Jonkers, K., De Moya Anegon, F., & Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Measuring the usage of e-research infrastructure as an indicator of research activity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1374–1382.
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles. Scientometrics, 68(3), 501–517.
Kretschmer, H., & Aguillo, I. F. (2004). Visibility of collaboration on the web. Scientometrics, 61(3), 405–426.
Larson, R. R. (1996). Bibliometrics of the world wide web: An exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 33, 71–78.
Lepori, B., Barberio, V., Seeber, M., & Aguillo, I. (2013). Core-periphery structures in national higher education systems. A cross-country analysis using interlinking data. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 622–634.
Li, X., Thelwall, M., Musgrove, P. B., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). The relationship between the WIFs or inlinks of computer science departments in UK and their RAE ratings or research productivities in 2001. Scientometrics, 57(2), 239–255.
Mettrop, W., & Nieuwenhuysen, P. (2001). Internet search engines—Fluctuations in document accessibility. Journal of Documentation, 57(5), 623–651.
Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2009). Mapping world-class universities on the web. Information Processing and Management, 45(2), 272–279.
Ortega, J. L., Orduña-Malea, E., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014). Are web mentions accurate substitutes for inlinks for Spanish universities? Online Information Review, 38(1), 59–77.
Park, H. W. (2010). Mapping the e-science landscape in South Korea using the webometrics method. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 211–229.
Rodríguez i Gairín, J. M. (1997). Valorando el impacto de la información en internet: AltaVista, el “citation index” de la red (evaluating the impact of internet information: AltaVista, the “citation index” of the web). Revista Española De Documentación Científica, 20(2), 175–181.
Romero-Frias, E., & Vaughan, L. (2010). European political trends viewed through patterns of web linking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 2109–2121.
Rousseau, R. (1999). Daily time series of common single word searches in AltaVista and NorthernLight. Cybermetrics, 2/3, Retrieved January 21, 2014 from: http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v2i1p2.pdf.
Seeber, M., Lepori, B., Lomi, A., Aguillo, I., & Barberio, V. (2012). Factors affecting web links between European higher education institutions. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 435–447.
Smith, A. G. (1999). A tale of two web spaces; comparing sites using web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 55(5), 577–592.
Stuart, D., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Investigating triple helix relationships using URL citations: A case study of the UK west midlands automobile industry. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 97–106.
Thelwall, M. (2000). Web impact factors and search engine coverage. Journal of Documentation, 56(2), 185–189.
Thelwall, M. (2001). Results from a web impact factor crawler. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 177–191.
Thelwall, M. (2002). Conceptualizing documentation on the web: An evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university web sites. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 995–1005.
Thelwall, M. (2006). Interpreting social science link analysis research: A theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 60–68.
Thelwall, M. (2008). Extracting accurate and complete results from search engines: Case study Windows Live. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 38–50.
Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.
Thelwall, M. (2011). A comparison of link and URL citation counting. ASLIB Proceedings, 63(4), 419–425.
Thelwall, M., & Harries, G. (2004). Do the web sites of higher rated scholars have significantly more online impact? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 149–159.
Thelwall, M., Klitkou, A., Verbeek, A., Stuart, D., & Vincent, C. (2010). Policy-relevant webometrics for individual scientific fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1464–1475.
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (in press). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating and measuring scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2011). A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organisations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1488–1497.
Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2012). Webometric research with the Bing Search API 2.0. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 44–52.
Thelwall, M., Sud, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2012). Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(4), 805–816.
Vaughan, L., & Hysen, K. (2002). Relationship between links to journal Web sites and impact factors. ASLIB Proceedings, 54(6), 356–361.
Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14), 1313–1322.
Vaughan, L., & Yang, R. (2012). Web data as academic and business quality estimates: A comparison of three data sources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1960–1972. doi:10.1002/asi.22659.
Vaughan, L., & You, J. (2006). Comparing business competition positions based on web co-link data: The global market versus the Chinese market. Scientometrics, 68(3), 611–628.
White, H. D., Boell, S. K., Yu, H., Davis, M., Wilson, C. S., & Cole, F. T. (2009). Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1083–1096.
Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Search markets and search results: The case of Bing. Library and Information Science Research, 35(4), 318–325.
Acknowledgments
This paper is supported by ACUMEN (Academic Careers Understood through Measurement and Norms) project, Grant agreement number 266632, under the Seventh Framework Program of the European Union.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sud, P., Thelwall, M. Linked title mentions: a new automated link search candidate. Scientometrics 101, 1831–1849 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1374-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1374-8